Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:53:48.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural fluctuations in a soft bottom benthic community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. A. Eagle
R. A. Eagle*
Affiliation:
Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd
*
* Present address: M.A.F.F. Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Benthic faunal communities have usually been described from data collected during a single survey, and it has been assumed that most benthic communities are reasonably stable. However, in areas such as important fishing grounds or around effluent disposal areas where surveys have been repeated periodically, the results quite frequently show marked changes. These do not always correlate to annual breeding cycles but are more unpredictable and of a different period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , November 1975 , pp. 865 - 878
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aller, R. C. & Dodge, R. E., 1974. Animal-sediment relations in a tropical lagoon, Discovery Bay, Jamaica. Journal of Marine Research, 32, 209–32.Google Scholar
Baggerman, B., 1953. Spatfall and transport of Cardium edule L. Archives ne'erlandaises de zoologie, 10, 315–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B. L., 1964. Primary and secondary settlement in Mytilus edulis L. (Mollusca). Journal of Animal Ecology, 33, 513–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkett, L., 1953. Changes in the composition of the bottom fauna of the Dogger Bank area. Nature, London, 171, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, S. A., Simon, J. L. & Hunter, V. D., 1972. Animal-sediment relations and community analysis of a Florida estuary. Marine Biology, 13 (1), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysen, Jensen P., 1919. Valuation of the Limf jord. I. Studies on the fish-food in the Limfjord 1909–1917. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture, 26, 1–44.Google Scholar
Bray, J. R. & Curtis, J. T., 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27, 325–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. R., Colman, J. S. & Jones, N. S., 1963. Marine fauna of the Isle of Man and its surrounding seas, 2nd edn. 307 pp. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, F. M., 1923. Quantitative studies on the fauna of the sea-bottom. I. Preliminary investigations of the Dogger Bank. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Series 2, 6, Part 2.Google Scholar
Dean, D. & Haskin, H. H., 1964. Benthic repopulation of the Raritan River Estuary following pollution abatement. Limnology and Oceanography, 9, 551–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, 1938. Effect of discharge of crude sewage into the estuary of the River Mersey on the amount and hardness of the deposit in the estuary. Water Pollution Research, Technical Paper No. 7, pp. 337.Google Scholar
Eagle, R. A., 1973. Benthic studies in the south east of Liverpool Bay. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 1, 285–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagle, R. A. & Rees, E. I. S., 1973. Indicator species – a case for caution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 4 (2), 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fager, E. W., 1964. Marine sediments: effects of a tube-building polychaete. Science, New York, 143, 356–9.0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, M. O., 1973. Reciprocal averaging. An eigenvector method of ordination. Journal of Ecology. 61, 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N. S., 1950. Marine bottom communities. Biological Reviews, 25, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C. A. M., 1966. Techniques in geomorphology. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kristensen, I., 1957. Differences in density and growth in a cockle population in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Archives ne'erlandaises de zoologie, 12, 351–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lance, G. N. & Williams, W. T., 1967. A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies. I. Hierarchical systems. Computer Journal, 9 (4), 373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, M. & Ghelardi, R. J., 1964. A table for calculation of the ‘equitability’ component of species diversity. Journal of Animal Ecology, 33, 217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, D. W., Halcrow, W. & Thornton, I., 1972. Sludge dumping in the Firth of Clyde. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 3 (1), 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcnulty, J. K., Work, R. C. & Moore, H. B., 1962. Some relationships between the infauna of the level bottom and the sediment in South Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 12, 322–32.Google Scholar
Margalef, R., 1968. Perspectives in ecological theory. 111 pp. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mileikovsky, S. A., 1974. On predation of pelagic larvae and early juveniles of marine bottom invertebrates by adult benthic invertebrates, and their passing alive through their predators. Marine Biology, 26, 303–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, E. L., 1971. Views on the community concept, with comments on continua and the role of instability in some marine benthic communities. Vie et milieu, supplement 22, 145–53.Google Scholar
Pearson, T. H., 1971. Studies on the ecology of the macrobenthic fauna of Lochs Linnhe and Eil, West coast of Scotland. II. Analysis of the macrobenthic fauna by comparison of feeding groups. Vie et milieu, supplement 22, 53–91.Google Scholar
Peer, D. L., 1970. Relation between biomass, productivity and loss to predators in a population of a marine benthic polychaete, Pectinaria hyperborea. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 27, 2143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. G. Joh., 1918. The sea bottom and its production of fish-food. III. A survey of the work done in connection with the valuation of Danish waters 1883–1917. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture, 25, 1–62.Google Scholar
Rees, E. I. S., 1973 a. Monitoring study of the benthos at the spoil ground. In: Out of sight: out of mind, vol. 3. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Rees, E. I. S., 1973 b. Inshore benthos and sediment investigation. In: Out of sight: out of mind, vol. 3. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Rees, E. I. S., Walker, A. J. M. & Ward, A. R., 1972. Benthic fauna in relation to sludge disposal. In: Out of sight: out of mind, vol. 2. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C., 1974. Organism-sediment relations on the muddy sea floor. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 12, 263–300.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. & Young, D. K., 1970. The influence of deposit feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. Journal of Marine Research, 28 (2), 150–77.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1958. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. I. Animal-sediment relationships. Limnology and Oceanography, 3, 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1960. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. III. The structure of the soft-bottom community. Limnology and Oceanography, 5, 138–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. American Naturalist, 102 (925), 243–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1969. Benthic marine diversity and the stability-time hypothesis. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology, 22, 71–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Savilov, A. I., 1957. Biological aspects of the bottom fauna groupings of the North Okhotsk Sea. In: Marine biology, ed. Nikitin, B. N., vol. 20, 67–136. Transactions of the Institute of Oceanology. Moscow: U.S.S.R. Academy of Science Press.Google Scholar
Shelton, R. G. J., 1971. Sludge dumping in the Thames Estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2 (2), 24–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobodkin, L. B. & Sanders, H. L., 1969. On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology, 22, 82–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). In: Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology, ed. Hedgpeth, J. W.. Washington: Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1966. Some factors influencing the recruitment and establishment of marine benthic communities. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 3, 267–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turpaeva, E. P., 1957. Food interrelationships of dominant species in marine benthic biocoenoses. In: Marine biology, ed. Nikitin, B. N., vol. 20, 137–48. Transactions of the Institute of Oceanology. Moscow: U.S.S.R. Academy of Science Press.Google Scholar
Ursin, E., 1952. Change in the composition of the bottom fauna of the Dogger Bank area. Nature, London, 170, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1952. The influence of the nature of the substratum on the metamorphosis of the larvae of marine animals, especially the larvae of Ophelia bicornis Savigny. Annales de I'lnstitut oceanographique, 27, 49–156.Google Scholar
Winter, A. & Barrett, M. J., 1972. Bed sediments: chemical examination. In: Out of sight: out of mind, vol. 2. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Wolff, W. J., 1973. The estuary as a habitat. An analysis of data on the soft-bottom macrofauna of the estuarine area of the Rivers Rhine, Meuse and Schedlt. Zoologische verhandelingen, 126, 1–242.Google Scholar
Young, D. K. & Rhoads, D. C., 1971. Animal-sediment relation in Cape Cod Bay, Mass. I. A transect study. Marine Biology, 11, 242–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zatsepin, V. I., 1970. On the significance of various ecological groups of animals in the bottom communities of the Greenland, Norwegian and the Barents Seas. In: Marine food chains, ed. Steele, J. H., 207–11. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar