Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:28:44.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New and little-known marine species of Pinaciophora, Rabdiaster and Thomseniophora gen. nov. (Rotosphaerida: Pompholyxophryidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2012

Kenneth H. Nicholls*
Affiliation:
S-15 Concession 1, RR #1 Sunderland, Ontario, CanadaL0C 1H0
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: K.H. Nicholls, S-15 Concession 1, RR #1 Sunderland, Ontario, CanadaL0C 1H0 email: khnicholls@interhop.net

Abstract

Near-shore benthic sediment samples collected at low tide from the western Atlantic Ocean (Sable Island, Nova Scotia, Canada) and the eastern Pacific Ocean (Haida Gwaii (Queen Charlotte Islands), British Columbia, Canada) were searched for little-known species of the rhizarian (Cercozoa) genera Pinaciophora, Rabdiaster and other related rotosphaerids. Several representatives with complete investitures of silica-scales (the structure of which is taxonomically diagnostic) were studied by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. The validity of the genus Pinaciophora (sensu Penard, 1904) as defined by a single type of plate-scale only, was strengthened by the discovery of Pinaciophora rubicunda and of another previously undescribed entity, both of which lacked spine-scales. Several earlier reports of loose scales from marine habitats, and erroneously identified as the freshwater P. fluviatilis, might be assigned to P. marina sp. nov. The new genus Thomseniophora was erected to include all ‘Pinaciophora' previously known to produce spine-scales and seven new taxa were described. Six other little-known species of Thomseniophora, Pinaciophora and Rabdiaster were described from the Canadian west coast (Pacific Ocean) including one new species of Pinaciophora. The addition of Thomseniophora brings the number of genera assigned to the Rotosphaerida to six: Pinaciophora, Thomseniophora, Rabdiaster, Rabdiophrys and Pompholyxophrys. The presence of several apparently closely related taxa in the same collection (same location and sampling date) strengthens the conclusion that relatively small differences in the morphology of their siliceous scales were more likely caused by genetic differences than by environmental influences.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adl, S.M., Simpson, A.G.B., Farmer, M.A., Andersen, R.A., Anderson, O.R., Barta, J.R., Bowser, S.S., Brugerolle, G., Fensome, R.A., Fredericq, S., James, T.Y., Karpov, S., Kugrens, P., Krug, J., Lane, C.E., Lewis, L.A., Lodge, D.J., Lynn, D.H., Mann, D.G., McCourt, R.M., Mendoza, L., Moestrup, Ø., Mozley-Standridge, S.E., Nerad, T.A., Shearer, C.A., Smirnov, A.V., Spiegel, F.W. and Taylor, M.F.J.R. (2005) The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 52, 399451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belcher, J.H. and Swale, E.M.F. (1978) Records from England of the heliozoan-like organism Pinaciophora fluviatilis Greeff and of its scales, ‘Potamodiscus kalbei' Gerloff. Archiv für Protistenkunde 120, 367370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corliss, J.O. (1994) An interim utilitarian (‘user-friendly') hierarchical classification and characterization of the protists. Acta Protozoologica 33, 151.Google Scholar
Croome, R. (1987a) Pinaciophora columna n. sp., P. tasmanica n. sp. and P. apora n. sp., new heliozoeans from Australia, and a report of P. fluviatilis Greeff from Antarctica. Archiv für Protistenkunde 133, 1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croome, R. (1987b) Pinaciophora ovalis (Rotosphaerida, Heliozoea), a new species from Australia. Archiv für Protistenkunde 134, 343346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteban, G.F., Gooday, A.J. and Clarke, K.J. (2007) Siliceous scales of filose-amoebae (Pompholyxophryidae, Rotosphaerida) from deep Southern Ocean sediments, including first records for the Southern Hemisphere. Polar Biology 30, 945950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaarder, K.R., Fryxell, G.A. and Hasle, G.R. (1976) Potamodiscus kalbei Gerloff, an organism with siliceous scales. Archiv für Protistenkunde 118, 346351.Google Scholar
Gerloff, J. (1968) Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Diatomeenschalen. VI. Potamodiscus kalbei nov. gen. et nov. spec. Willdenowia 4, 353361.Google Scholar
Howe, A., Bass, D., Scoble, J., Lewis, R., Vickerman, K., Arndt, H. and Cavalier-Smith, T. (2011) Novel cultured protists identify deep-branching environmental DNA clades of Cercozoa: new genera Tremula, Micrometopion, Minimassisteria, Nudifila, Peregrinia. Protist 162, 332372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalbe, L. (1979) Weitere Angaben über Potamodiscus. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 85, 400403.Google Scholar
Manton, I. and Sutherland, J. (1979) Further observations on Potamodiscus Gerloff = Pinaciophora Greeff, with special reference to Alaska and Arctic Canada. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 67, 285295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikrjukov, K.A. (1994) Rabdiophrys pertzovi sp. nov.—a new marine rotosphaerid heliozoon from the White Sea. Archiv für Protistenkunde 144, 325327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikrjukov, K.A. (1999) Taxonomic revision of scale-bearing heliozoon-like amoebae (Pompholyxophryidae, Rotosphaerida). Acta Protozoologica 38, 119131.Google Scholar
Nicholls, K.H. (1983) Little-known and new heliozoeans: Pinacophora triangula Thomsen new to North America and a description of Pinaciophora pinea sp. nov. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61, 13871390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, K.H. (2009a) A multivariate statistical evaluation of the ‘acolla-complex' of Corythionella species, including a description of C. darwini n. sp. (Rhizopoda: Filosea, or Rhizaria: Cercozoa). European Journal of Protistology 45, 183192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, K.H. (2009b) Six new marine species of the genus Paulinella (Rhizopoda: Filosea, or Rhizaria: Cercozoa). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 14151425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, F.C. and Siemensma, F.J. (1991) Nackte Rhizopododa und Heliozoea. Protozoenfauna Band 2. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, 297 pp.Google Scholar
Patterson, D.J., Simpson, A.G.B. and Rogerson, A. (2002) Amoebae of uncertain affinities. In Lee, J.J., Leedale, G.F. and Bradbury, P. (eds) An illustrated guide to the protozoa, Volume II. Lawrence, KS: Society of Protozoologists, pp. 804827. [Incorrectly dated 2000.]Google Scholar
Penard, E. (1904) Les Héliozoaires d'eau douce. Genève: Heliozoa, 341 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainer, H. (1968) Urtiere, Protozoa Wurzelfüßler, Rhizopoda Sonnentierchen, Heliozoa. In Dahl, F. (ed.) Die Tierwelt Deutschlands. Volume 56. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 176 pp.Google Scholar
Roijackers, R.M.M. and Siemensma, F.J. (1988) A study of cristidiscoidid amoebae (Rhizopoda, Filosea), with descriptions of new species and keys to genera and species. Archiv für Protistenkunde 135, 237253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, E. (1981) Loricate and scale-bearing protists form Lützow-Holm Bay, Antarctica I. Species of the Acanthoecidae and the Centrohelida found at a site selected in the fast ice. Antarctic Record 73, 122.Google Scholar
Thomsen, H.A. (1978) On the identity between the heliozoan Pinaciophora fluviatilis and Potamodiscus kalbei; with the description of eight new Pinaciophora species. Protistologica 14, 359373.Google Scholar
Thomsen, H.A. (1979) Electron microscopical observations on brackish-water nannoplankton from the Tvärminne area, SW coast of Finland. Acta Botanica Fennica 110, 1137.Google Scholar
Vørs, N. (1993) Heterotrophic amoebae, flagellates and heliozoa from Arctic marine waters (North West Territories, Canada and West Greenland). Polar Biology 13, 113126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar