Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:24:55.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New observations on reproduction in the branching polychaetes Ramisyllis multicaudata and Syllis ramosa (Annelida: Syllidae: Syllinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2017

Paul C. Schroeder ,
M. Teresa Aguado ,
Allyson Malpartida  and
Christopher J. Glasby
Paul C. Schroeder*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4236, USA
M. Teresa Aguado
Affiliation:
Departmento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Allyson Malpartida
Affiliation:
Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, GPO Box 4646, Darwin, N.T., Australia
Christopher J. Glasby*
Affiliation:
Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, GPO Box 4646, Darwin, N.T., Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P. Schroeder, School of Biological Sciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4236, USA; email: schroede2003@yahoo.com
C. Glasby, Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, GPO Box 4646, Darwin, N.T., Australia email: chris.glasby@nt.gov.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reproduction in the shallow-water, sponge-dwelling, branching syllid Ramisyllis multicaudata exhibits several features unique among syllids and among annelids in general. We describe and illustrate the segmental asymmetry which intervenes between regions of symmetry, only found in branching annelids. We describe the morphology of the stolons and of the stolon stalks, which are unique to branching syllids but differ in detail from those of the other known branching syllid, Syllis ramosa. We also illustrate newly found paddle-shaped chaetae, which might indicate that these stolons do swim. We list the number of branch points and termini in an effort to gauge the extent of branching in a worm contained in a small sponge. The species appears to have separate sexes, but this cannot be proven. We compare R. multicaudata and S. ramosa as originally described and find new morphological differences between the branching syllid from Japan described as S. ramosa and R. multicaudata. We also compare the known stolons of branching syllids to those of other genera of the ‘ribbon clade’, a group including Trypanobia and Trypanosyllis, now known to be close relatives of R. multicaudata. Ramisyllis multicaudata is the first member of the ribbon clade, and one of few Syllinae, known to have sexually dimorphic stolons.

Keywords

PolychaetaPoriferaspongewormreproductive biologysex
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 97 , Special Issue 5: Proceedings of the 12th International Polychaete Conference Amgueddfa Cymru - National Museum Wales Cardiff, Wales, UK, 1-5 August 2016 , August 2017 , pp. 1167 - 1175
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguado, M.T., Glasby, C.J., Schroeder, P.C., Weigert, A. and Bleidorn, C. (2015a) The making of a branching annelid: an analysis of complete mitochondrial genome and ribosomal data of Ramisyllis multicaudata . Scientific Reports (Nature) . doi: 10.1038/srep12072.Google Scholar
Aguado, M.T., Helm, C., Weidhase, M. and Bleidorn, C. (2015b) Description of a new syllid species as a model for evolutionary research of reproduction and regeneration in annelids. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 15, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s13127-014-0183-5.Google Scholar
Aguado, M.T., Murray, A. and Hutchings, P. (2015c) Syllidae (Annelida, Phyllodocida) from Lizard Island (Queensland, Australia). Zootaxa 4019, 35–60. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4019.1.5.Google Scholar
Aguado, M.T. and San Martín, G. (2009) Phylogeny of Syllidae (Polychaeta) based on morphological data. Zoologica Scripta 38, 379–402.Google Scholar
Aguado, M.T., San Martín, G and Siddall, M.E. (2012) Systematics and evolution of syllids (Annelida, Syllidae). Cladistics 28, 234–250.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Campos, P., San Martín, G. and Aguado, M.T. (2013) A new species and a new record of the commensal genus Alcyonosyllis Glasby & Watson, 2001 and new species of Parahaplosyllis Hartmann-Schröder, 1990 (Annelida: Syllidae: Syllinae) from Philippines Islands. Zootaxa 3734, 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, E. and Berkeley, C. (1938) Notes on Polychaeta from the coast of western Canada. II. Syllidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. Series 11, 33–49.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, R.V. (1919) New polychaetous annelids from Laguna Beach, California. Pomona College Journal of Entomology and Zoology 11, 1–23.Google Scholar
Claparède, É. (1864) Glanures zootomiques parmi les annélides de Port-Vendres (Pyrénées Orientales). Mémoires de la Société de Physique et d'Histoire Naturelle de Genève 17, 463–600, plates I–VIII.Google Scholar
Ehlers, E. (1864) Die Borstenwürmer (Annelida Chaetopoda) nach systematischen und anatomischen Untersuchungen dargestellt, Volume 1. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, pp. 1–268.Google Scholar
Fukuda, M.V. and Nogueira, J.M. (2013) On a new species of Nuchalosyllis (Polychaeta: Syllidae), a rare syllid genus only known from Brazilian waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93, 963–966.Google Scholar
Garwood, P.R. (1991) Reproduction and the classification of the family Syllidae (Polychaeta). Ophelia Supplement 5, 81–87.Google Scholar
Glasby, C.J., Schroeder, P.C. and Aguado, M.T. (2012) Branching out: a remarkable new branching syllid (Annelida) living in a Petrosia sponge (Porifera: Demospongiae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 164, 481–497.Google Scholar
Gravier, C. and Dantan, J.L. (1928) Peches nocturnes a la lumière dans la Baie d'Alger. Annélides polychètes. Annales de l'Institut Oceanographique, Paris n.s. 5, 1–187.Google Scholar
Grube, A.E. (1855) Beschreibungen neuer oder wenig bekannter Anneliden. Arkiv fur Naturgeschichte, Berlin 21, 81–136, pls. 133–135.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1956) Polychaeten -Studien I. Zoologischer Anzeiger 157, 87–91.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1990) Die polychaeten der subtropisch-tropischen und tropischen Ostkueste Australiens zwischen Lake Macquarie (New South Wales) im Sueden und Gladstone (Quuensland) im Norden. In Hartmann-Schröder, G. and Hartmann G. (eds) Zur Kenntnis des eulitorals der australischen Kuesten unter besounderer Beruecksichtigung des Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 15. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen zoologischen Museum und Institut 87, 41–87.Google Scholar
Heacox, A.E. (1980) Reproduction and larval development of Typosyllis pulchra (Berkeley & Berkeley) (Polychaeta: Syllidae). Pacific Science 34, 245–259.Google Scholar
Imajima, M. (1966) The Syllidae (Polychaetous Annelids) from Japan (IV) Syllinae (1). Publications of the Seto Marine Biology Laboratory 14, 219–252.Google Scholar
Imajima, M. and Hartman, O. (1964) The polychaetous annelids of Japan. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation 26, 1–452 (issued in 2 parts).Google Scholar
Johnson, H.P. (1901) The Polychaeta of the Puget Sound region. Proceedings of the Boston Natural History Society 29, 381–437, pls 381–319.Google Scholar
Johnson, H.P. (1902) Collateral budding in annelids of the genus Trypanosyllis . American Naturalist 36, 295–315.Google Scholar
Junqua, C. (1957) Stolonisation et polycéphalie expérimentales chez Trypanosyllis zebra Grube (Annélide Polychète). Annales des Sciences Naturelles (Zoologie) Série 11, 19, 59–68.Google Scholar
de Lamarck, J.B. (1818) Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent; precedes d'une Introduction offrant la determination des caracteres essentiels de l`Animal, sa distinction du vegetal et desautres corps naturels, enfin, l'Exposition des Principes fondamentaux de la Zoologie. Paris: Deterville, 612 pp.Google Scholar
Langerhans, P. (1879) Die Wurmfauna von Madeira (Part 1). Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 32, 513–592, pls XXXi–XXXIII.Google Scholar
Malaquin, A. (1893) Recherches sur les Syllidiens: morphologie, anatomie, reproduction, développement. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences, de l'Agriculture et des Arts de Lille 18, 1–477.Google Scholar
Maldonado, M. and Riesgo, A. (2009) Gametogenesis, embryogenesis, and larval features of the oviparous sponge Petrosia ficiformis (Haplosclerida, Demospongiae). Marine Biology 156, 2181–2197.Google Scholar
Marion, A.F. and Bobretzky, N. (1875) Étude des annélides du golfe de Marseille. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie et Paléontology 2, 2–46.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W.C. (1879) On a remarkably branched Syllis dredged by H.M.S. Challenger. Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology 14, 720–724.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W.C. (1885) Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Challenger Reports 12, 1–554. URL for plate showing the habitus of Syllis ramosa in the Challenger Reports: http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-34/plates-200/p031.jpg.Google Scholar
Okada, Y.K. (1933) Two interesting syllids with remarks on their asexual reproduction. Memoirs of the College of Science, University of Kyoto 8B, 325–338.Google Scholar
Okada, Y.K. (1937) La stolonisation et les caractères sexuels du stolon chez les syllidiens polychètes (études sur les syllidiens III). Japanese Journal of Zoology 7, 441–491.Google Scholar
Potts, F.A. (1911) Methods of reproduction in the syllids. Ergebnisse und Fortschritte der Zoologie 3, 1–72.Google Scholar
Potts, F.A. (1913) Stolon formation in certain species of Trypanosyllis . Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 58, 411–446.Google Scholar
Rouse, G.W. and Fauchald, K. (1997) Cladistics and the polychaetes. Zoologica Scripta 26, 139–204.Google Scholar
Rullier, F. and Amoureux, L. (1979) Campagne de la Calypso au large des côtes Atlantiques de l'Amérique du Sud (1961–1962). I. 33. Annélides Polychètes. Annales de l'Institut Océanographique 55, 145–206.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. (2003) Annelida Polychaeta II: Syllidae. In Ramos, M.A. et al. (eds) Fauna Ibérica, Volume 21. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, pp. 1–554.Google Scholar
Schroeder, P.C. and Hermans, C.O. (1975) Annelida: Polychaeta. In Giese, A.C. and Pearse, J.S. (eds) Reproduction of marine invertebrates, Volume 3: annelids and echiurans. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 1–213.Google Scholar
Vosmaer, G.C.J. (1885) Porifera, parts Vll–XI. In Bronn, H.G. (ed.) Die Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-Reichs. 1. Leipzig: Heidelberg, pp. 177–368, pls XIX–XXV.Google Scholar
Weidhase, M., Beckers, P., Bleidorn, C. and Aguado, M.T. (2016) Reproduction and regeneration in Typosyllis antoni (Annelida: Syllidae) with a special focus on proventricle removal effects. BMC Evolutionary Biology 16, 196. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0770-5.Google Scholar
Wissocq, J.-C. (1966) La sexualisation du stolon chez Syllis spongicola . Cahiers du Biologie Marine 7, 337–342.Google Scholar