Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:44:11.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Biology of Cirripedes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

K. A. Pyefinch
K. A. Pyefinch
Affiliation:
Biologist, The Corrosion Committee, British Iron and Steel Research Association. From the Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the course of some 4 years′ work on the biology of fouling organisms, observations have been made on aspects of the general biology of Balanus balanoides, B. crenatus and Verruca stroemia.

Observations on the state of development of the ova within the mantle cavity of B. balanoides and of the occurrence of the larvae in the plankton indicate that hatching takes place during the first fortnight in March, that the later-stage nauplii are abundant during the second half of that month and that the cyprid larvae may become abundant during April. The larval sequence is not always completed successfully; conditions which seem inimical are discussed.

Factors which seem to be of importance in affecting settlement of B. balanoides are discussed. The presence of other organisms is an adverse factor, though the potency of this factor is probably not the same for all organisms; the presence of slime can prevent settlement and, though evidence can be quoted in support of heavier settlement on shaded surfaces, it is emphasized that the operation of other factors may have brought about this result. The proportion of the tidal cycle during which current speeds are not too high to prevent settlement seems likely to be important.

Provided that other conditions are favourable B. balanoides settles readily on surfaces continuously immersed and individuals which settle under these conditions grow more rapidly, at least for the first few months after settlement, than their contemporaries on the shore.

The larvae of B. crenatus appear in the plankton rather earlier than those of B. balanoides, but the time taken to complete the larval sequence from the 1st stage nauplius to the cyprid is roughly the same as that for the latter species, namely 1 month. In B. crenatus, however, hatching is not limited to a short period during March but continues at intervals through the summer. There are indications that the successful completion of the larval sequence of this species is less affected by an abundance of phytoplankton than is that of B. balanoides.

Settlement of B. crenatus is periodic and individuals which settle early in the spring can attain practically their full size (28–30 mm. basal length) during the same season. Growth during the summer takes place at average rates which vary from 0·1 to 0·2 mm. increase in basal length per day. Growth is negligible during the winter months.

Specimens of B. crenatus which settle early in April contain developing ova by the beginning of July, so that spring-settled forms can produce larvae which themselves may settle before the end of the summer.

Observations on Verruca stroemia have been limited to the occurrence of the larvae in the plankton. Like those of Balanus crenatus, the larvae of Verruca stroemia are present at intervals through the summer. Early-stage nauplii of this species may dominate the plankton early in the year, but no correspondingly heavy hauls of later-stage nauplii have been recorded. Possible explanations of this discrepancy are discussed. The cyprid never occurs in any numbers in surface hauls.

Incidental observations on the planktonic occurrence of the nauplii of Sacculina (probably S. carcini) and of Peltogaster paguri are given.

Details are given of the abundance of all Cirripede larvae in the plankton for the years 1944–47 which emphasize the extent of variation that can occur from year to year.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 1948 , pp. 464 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassindale, R., 1936. The developmental stages of three English barnacles, Balanus balanoides (Linn.), Chthamalus stellatus (Poli) and Verruca stroemia (O. F. Müller). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1936, pp. 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschma, H., 1927. Bermerkungen über Rhizocephalen des Golfes von NeapeL. Publ. del. Staz. Zool. Napoli, Vol. VIII, pp. 261–72.Google Scholar
Darwin, C., 1854. Monograph of the Cirripedia. Balanidae. Ray Society. London.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1923. Notes on the breeding and growth of marine animals in the Clyde sea area. Ann. Rep. Scot. Mar. Biol. Assoc., 1922.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1932. Sur l'habitat des Cirripédes Balanus crenatus Brug. et Verruca stroemia O. F. Müller. Bull. Lab. Maritime St Servan, No. 8, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Fish, C. J., 1925. Seasonal distribution of the plankton of the Woods Hole region. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. Washington, Vol. XLI, pp. 91–179.Google Scholar
Foxon, G. E. H., 1940. Notes on the life history of Sacculina carcini Thompson. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIV, pp. 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grave, B. H., 1933. Rate of growth, age at sexual maturity and duration of life of certain sessile organisms at Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. LXV, pp. 275–386.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Gunther, E. R., 1935. The plankton of the South Georgia whaling grounds and adjacent waters, 1926–27. Discovery Repts., Vol. XI, pp. 1–456.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W., Cooper, L. H. N., Lebour, M. V. & Russell, F. S., 1935. Plankton production and its control. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XX, pp. 407–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton, H. & Fischer-Piette, E., 1932. Observations et expériences sur le peuplement des côtes rocheuses par les Cirripèdes. Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, No. 592.Google Scholar
Herz, L. E., 1933. The morphology of the later stages of Balanus crenatus Brugière. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. LXIV, pp. 432–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoek, P. P. C., 1909. Die Cirripedien des nordischen Planktons. Nordisches Plankton. Bd. IV, No. 8, pp. 265–331.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J., Scott, A. & Chadwick, H. C., 1924. The Marine Plankton. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Lucas, C. E., 1936. On certain inter-relations between phytoplankton and zoo plankton under experimental conditions. Conseil Per. Internal, p. l'Explor. de la Mer, Journ. du Conseil, Vol. XI, pp. 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, R., 1927. Irregular development in the larval history of Meganyctiphanes norvegica. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIV, pp. 785–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, K. D., 1943. Sessile marine invertebrates at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecol. Monog., Vol. XIII, pp. 321–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1934. The biology of Balanus balanoides. I. Growth rate and its relation to size, season and tidal level. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, pp. 851–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1935a. The biology of Balanus balanoides. III. The soft parts. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XX, pp. 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1935b. The biology of Balanus balanoides. IV. Relation to environmental factors. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XX, pp. 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B. & Kitching, J. A., 1939. The biology of Chthamalus stellatus (Poli). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIII, pp. 521–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neu, W., 1933. Der Einfluss des Farbtons der Unterlage auf die Besiedlung mit Balanus da Costa und Spirorbis Mont. Internal. Revue des ges. Hydrobiol. u. Hydrographie, Bd. XXVIII, Heft ¾, pp. 228–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson-Cantell, C. A., 1921. Cirripedien studien. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, Vol. VII, pp. 75–378.Google Scholar
Pomerat, C. M. & Reiner, E. R., 1942. The influence of surface angle and of light in the attachment of barnacles and of other sedentary organisms. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. LXXXII, pp. 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerat, C. M. & Weiss, C. M., 1946. The influence of texture and composition of surface in the attachment of sedentary marine organisms. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. XCI, pp. 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, M. G. M., 1940. On the hardening of the cuticle of insects. Proc. Roy. Soc., Lond. (B), Vol. CXXVIII, pp. 393–407.Google Scholar
Pyefinch, K. A., 1948. Methods of identification of the larvae of Balanus balanoides (Linn.), B. crenatus Brug. and Verruca stroemia O. F. Müller. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVII, pp.Google Scholar
Reinhard, E. G., 1946. Rhizocephala from New England and the Grand Banks. Journ. Wash. Acad. Sci., Vol. XXXVI, pp. 127–31.Google Scholar
Runnström, S., 1925. Zur Biologie und Entwicklung von Balanus balanoides (Linné). Bergens Mus. Aarbok., Naturv. Raekke, Nr. 5.Google Scholar
Scott, T., 1901. Land, fresh-water and marine Crustacea. Fauna, Flora and Geology of the Clyde Area. Glasgow.Google Scholar
Smith, F. G. Walton, 1946. Effect of water currents upon the attachment and growth of barnacles. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. XC, pp. 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topsent, E., 1911. Croissance et mort des balanes à Luc-sur-Mer. Ann. Inst. océanogr., T. II, Fasc. 6.Google Scholar
Visscher, J. P., 1928. Reactions of the cyprid larvae of barnacles at the time of attachment. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. LIV, pp. 327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, J. P. & Luce, R. H., 1928. Reactions of the cyprid larvae of barnacles to light with special reference to spectral colours. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. LIV, pp. 336–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1938. The nature and significance of the membranes surrounding the developing eggs of Homarus vulgaris and other Decapoda. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, Vol. CVII, pp. 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar