Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:27:15.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the behaviour of Thalassema thalassemum (echiura: echiuridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2019

L.A. Nickell  and
R.J.A. Atkinson
L.A. Nickell
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, PO Box 3, Oban, Argyll, Scotland, PA34 4AD
R.J.A. Atkinson
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 OEG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The echiuran worm Thalassema thalassemum (Echiura: Echiuridae), is a deposit-feeder which uses its proboscis to collect sediment particles for ingestion. The proboscis is highly extensible and is used with dorsal surface downwards to skim particles from the sediment surface. Alternatively, the distal portion of the proboscis is arched over and the ventral surface of the tip is held against the sediment surface where ciliary movement facilitates particle collection. These methods are used in combination and collected material is moved back along the proboscis, the edges of which are rolled to form a closed tube. Burrows appear to be U-shaped with one predominantly inhalant and one exhalant opening. Faecal pellets are periodically ejected forming small mounds around exhalant openings and mean rates of 1·83 and 2·80 g dry wt d−1 were measured suggesting that, in sufficient densities, this species could make a significant contribution to macrofaunal bioturbation.

Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , November 1994 , pp. 963 - 966
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agius, L., Jaccarini, V., Ballantine, J.A., Ferrito, V., Pelter, A., Psaila, A.F. & Zammit, V.A., 1979. Photodynamic action of bonellin, an integumentary chlorin of Bonellia viridis, Rolando (Echiura, Bonelliidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 63B, 109–117.Google Scholar
Arp, A.J., Hansen, B.M. & Julian, D., 1992. Burrow environment and coelomic fluid characteristics of the echiuran worm Urechis caupo from populations at three sites in northern California. Marine Biology, 113, 613–623.Google Scholar
Awati, P.R. & Deshpande, D.S., 1935a. Food getting in Thalassema bombayensis . Proceedings of the Indian Science Congress, 22, 320. [Abstract no. 44.]Google Scholar
Awati, P.R. & Deshpande, D.S., 1935b. Respiratory movements in Thalassema bombayensis . Proceedings of the Indian Science Congress, 22, 320–321. [Abstract no. 45.]Google Scholar
Chuang, S.H., 1962. Feeding mechanism of the echiuroid, Ochetostoma erythrogrammon Leuckart & Rüppell, 1828. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 123, 80–85.Google Scholar
Cuenot, L., 1922. Sipunculiens, échiuriens, priapuliens. Paris: Lechevalier. [Faune de France, vol. 4.]Google Scholar
Fisher, W.K. & Macginitie, G.E., 1928. The natural history of an echiuroid worm. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 10,1, 204–213.Google Scholar
Gislen, T., 1940. Investigations on the ecology of Echiurus . Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, 36, 1–39.Google Scholar
Hughes, D.J., Ansell, A.D., Atkinson, R.J.A. & Nickell, L.A., 1993. Underwater television observations of surface activity of the echiuran worm Maxmuelleria lankesteri (Echiura: Bonelliidae). Journal of Natural History, 27, 219–248.Google Scholar
Hughes, R.N. & Crisp, D.J., 1976. A further description of the echiuran Prashadus pirotansis . Journal of Zoology, 180, 233–242.Google Scholar
Jaccarini, V. & Schembri, P.J., 1977. Feeding and particle selection in the echiuran worm Bonellia viridis Rolando (Echiura: Bonelliidae). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 28, 163–181.Google Scholar
Kershaw, P.J., Swift, D.J., Pentreath, R.J. & Lovett, M.B., 1983. Plutonium redistribution by biological activity in Irish Sea sediments. Nature, London, 306, 774–775.Google Scholar
Macginitie, G.E. & Macginitie, N., ed., 1968. Echiuroidea. In Natural history of marine animals, 2nd ed., pp. 184–193. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nickell, L.A., 1992. Deep bioturbation in organically enriched marine sediments. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Nicola Giudici, M. de, 1984. Defence mechanism of Bonellia viridis . Marine Biology, 78, 271–273.Google Scholar
Ohta, S., 1984. Star-shaped feeding traces produced by echiuran worms on the deep-sea floor of the Bay of Bengal. Deep-Sea Research, 31A, 1415–1432.Google Scholar
Pilger, J.F., 1980. The annual cycle of oogenesis, spawning, and larval settlement of the echiuran Listriolobus pelodes off southern California. Pacific Science, 34, 129–142.Google Scholar
Rachor, E. & Bartel, S., 1981. Occurrence and ecological significance of the spoon-worm Echiurus echiurus in the German Bight. Veröffentlichungen des Institutes für Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven, 19, 71–88.Google Scholar
Risk, M.J., 1973. Siluran echiuroids: possible feeding traces in the Thorold sandstone. Science, New York, 180, 1285–1287.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W., 1972. Ecology and palaeoecology of marine environments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Schembri, P.J. & Jaccarini, V., 1978. Some aspects of the ecology of the echiuran worm Bonellia viridis and associated infauna. Marine Biology, 47, 55–61.Google Scholar
Stephen, A.C. & Edmonds, S.J., 1972. The phyla Sipuncula and Echiura. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Vaugelas, J.V. De, 1989. Deep-sea lebensspuren: remarks on some echiuran traces in the Porcupine Seabight, northeast Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research, 36A, 975–982.Google Scholar
Wilkie, I.C., 1990. First record of the spoon-worm Thalassema thalassemum (Pallas), Echiura, in Scottish waters. Glasgow Naturalist, 21, 515–517.Google Scholar