Hostname: page-component-686fd747b7-26cps Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T11:10:43.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the theca of the motile phase of free-living and symbiotic isolates of Zooxanthella microadriatica (Freudenthal) comb.nov.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Alfred R. Loeblich  and
James L. Sherley
Alfred R. Loeblich
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004
James L. Sherley
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A strain of Zooxanthella microadriatica (Freudenthal) comb.nov. has been isolated from decaying Chondrus crispus (L.) Stackh. The ultrastructure of this isolate has been compared to that of Z. microadriatica inhabiting Cassiopea Peron and Lesueur, 1809, sp. In an aqueous medium the cell cycle of both isolates consists of a coccoid non-motile phase alternating with a thecate motile phase.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 195 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biecheler, B., 1934. Sur le réseau argentophile et la morphologie de quelques péridiniens nus. Compte rendu des séances de la Société de biologie, 115, 1039–1042.Google Scholar
Biecheler, B., 1952. Recherches sur les péridiniens. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique, supplement no. 36, vi, 149 pp.Google Scholar
Brandt, K., 1881. Ueber das Zusammenleben von Thieren und Algen. Verhandlungen der Physiologischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin, 1881–82, 22–26.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. & Hovasse, R., 1934. L'existence d'un réseau argentophile chez le Polykrikos et les précisions qu'il fournit à la morphologie péridinienne. Compte rendu des séances de la Société de biologie, 115, 1036.Google Scholar
Dodge, J. D. & Crawford, R. M., 1969. The fine structure of Gymnodinium fuscum (Dinophyceae). New Phytologist, 68, 613–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, H. D., 1962. Symbiodinium gen. nov. and Symbiodinium microadriaticum sp. nov., a zooxanthella: taxonomy, life cycle, and morphology. Journal of Protozoology, 9, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, P., 1882. On the nature and functions of the ‘yellow cells’ of radiolarians and coelenterates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 11, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollande, A. & Carré, D., 1975. Les xanthelles des radiolaires sphaerocollides, des acanthaires et de Velella velella: infrastructure-cytochime-taxonomic. Protistologica, 10, 573–601.Google Scholar
Hovasse, R., 1922. Endodinium chattoni (nov. gen. et sp.). Son cycle de multiplication endogéne. Variation du nombre de ses chromosomes. Compte rendu des séances de la Société de biologie, 87, 845–846.Google Scholar
Hovasse, R., 1937. Les zooxanthelles sont des dinoflagellés. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de 1'Académie des sciences, 205, 1015–1018.Google Scholar
Kubai, D. F. & Ris, H., 1969. Division in the dinoflagellate Gyrodinium cohnü (Schiller). A new type of nuclear reproduction. Journal of Cell Biology, 40, 508–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, R. E., 1977. Saprophytic and phagocytic isolates of the colourless heterotrophic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium lebouriae Herdman. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leutenegger, S., 1977. Ultrastructure and motility of dinophyceans symbiotic with larger, imperforated Foraminifera. Marine Biology, 44, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr., & Loeblich, A. R. III, 1966. Index to the genera, subgenera, and sections of the Pyrrhophyta. Studies in Tropical Oceanography, 3, ix, 94 pp.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., III, 1970. The amphiesma or dinoflagellate cell covering. In Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, vol. 2, Chicago, 1969 (ed. Yochelson, E. L.), pp. 867–929. Lawrence, Kansas: Allen Press Inc.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., III, 1975. A seawater medium for dinoflagellates and the nutrition of Cachonina niei. Journal of Phycology, 11, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., III, 1976. Dinoflagellate evolution: speculation and evidence. Journal of Protozoology, 23, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morbey, S. J., 1975. The palynostratigraphy of the Rhaetian stage, Upper Triassic in the Kendelbachgraben, Austria. Paleontographica (Abteilung B), 152, (1–3), 1–75.Google Scholar
Pascher, A., 1911. Über die Beziehungen der Cryptomonaden zu den Algen. Bericht der Deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft, 29, 193–203Google Scholar
Provasoli, L., 1964. Growing marine seaweeds. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Sea-weed Symposium, Biarritz, 1961 (ed. De Virville, A. D. and Feldmann, J.), pp. 9–17. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Rhumbler, L., 1909. Die Foraminiferan (Thalamophoren) der Plankton-Expedition. Zugleich Entwurf eines natürlichen Systems der Foraminiferen auf Grund selektionistischer und mechanisch-physiologischer Faktoren. Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der HumboltStiftung, 111 L.c., 331 pp.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, D. A. & Trench, R. K., 1976. Specificity of symbiosis between marine cnidarians and zooxanthellae. In Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior (ed. Mackie, G. O.), pp. 423–432. New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurr, A. R., 1969. A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 26, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, D. L., 1971. Ultrastructure of the ‘zooxanthella'Endodinium chattonü in situ. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. L., 1973. Algal symbionts of invertebrates. Annual Review of Microbiology, 27, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, D. L., 1974. Symbiotic marine algae: taxonomy and biological fitness. In Symbiosis in the Sea (ed. Vernberg, W. B.), pp. 245–262. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. H., 1950. A new genus and new records of fresh-water Pyrrophyta in the Desmokontae and Dinophyceae. Lloydia, 13, 277–299.Google Scholar
Wetherbee, R., 1975. The fine structure of Ceratium tripos, a marine armored dinoflagellate. I. The cell covering (theca). Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 50, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woloszyńska, J., 1917. Neue Peridineen-Arten, nebst Bemerhungen über den Bau der Hülle bei Gymno und Glenodinium. Bulletin de 1'Academie des sciences de Cracovie. Classe des sciences mathématiques et naturelles, sér. B, Sciences naturelles, 1917, 114–122.Google Scholar
Zucker, W. H., 1973. Fine Structure of Planktonic Foraminifera and their Endosymbiotic Algae. Ph.D. Thesis, City University of New York.Google Scholar