Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:03:35.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Nematocysts of Hydromedusae. II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

F. S. Russell
F. S. Russell
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The nematocysts of the three species of Leptomedusae, Aequorea forskalea, A. vitrina, and A. pensilis, and of the two siphonophores Agalma elegans and Velella velella are described.

The specific characters of the three species of Aequorea are discussed and it is shown that A. pensilis is probably the same species as A. macrodactyla

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , May 1939 , pp. 347 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bigelow, Henry B., 1913. Medusae and Siphonophorae collected by the U.S. Fisheries Steamer “Albatross” in the North-western Pacific. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Vol. 44, No. 1946, pp. 1–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, Henry B., 1909. Reports on the scientific results of the expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific.… XVI. The medusae. Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, Vol. XXXVII pp. 1–243.Google Scholar
Bigelow, Henry B., 1919. Hydromedusae, siphonophores and ctenophores of the “Albatross” Philippine Expedition. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 100 Vol. I, Pt. 3, pp. 279–362.Google Scholar
Bigelow, Henry B. & Sears, Mary, 1937. Siphonophorae. Rep. Danish Ocean. Exp., 1908–1910, Vol. 11, Pt. 2, pp. 1–144.Google Scholar
Browne, Edward T., 1897. On British medusae. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 816–35.Google Scholar
Browne, Edward T., 1903. Report on some medusae from Norway and Spitsbergen. Bergens Mus. A˚rb., No. 4, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Claus, Carl, 1883. Untersuchungen über die Organisation und Entwicklung der Medusen. 96 pp. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Wm. & Ashworth, J. H., 1909. Some medusae and ctenophores from the Firth of Forth. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinb., Vol. XVII, No. 6, pp. 300–11.Google Scholar
Forbes, Edward, 1851. On a species of Aequorea inhabiting the British Seas. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Pt. XIX, pp. 272–5.Google Scholar
Forskål, Petrus, 1775. Descriptiones animalium, avium, amphibiorum, piscium, insectorum, vermium; quae in itinere orientali observavit Petrus Forskål. Post mortem auctoris edidit Carsten Niebuhr. 164 pp. Hauniae.Google Scholar
Forskål, Petrus, 1776. Icones rerum naturalium, quas in itinere orientali depingi curavit Petrus Forskål. Post mortem auctoris ad Regis mandatum aeri incisas edidit Carsten Niebuhr. PI. I–XLIII. Hauniae.Google Scholar
Fraser, C. Mclean, 1916. On the development of Aequorea forskalea. Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, Ser. III, Vol. X, pp. 97–104.Google Scholar
Gosse, Philip Henry, 1853. A Naturalist's Rambles on the Devonshire Coast. John van Voorst, London, 451 pp.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst, 1879. Das System der Medusen. Jena.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, Clemens, 1894. Die Coelenteraten Helgolands. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch. Abt. Helgoland, N.F., Bd. 1, Heft 1, IV, pp. 161–206.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1933. Nordisches Plankton, Lief. 22, XII. Craspedote Medusen. 3 Teil. Leptomedusen, pp. 541–602.Google Scholar
Löfling, P., 1758. … Iter Hispanicum. … 316 pp. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Maas, Otto, 1905. Die Craspedoten Medusen der Siboga-Expedition. SibogaExpeditie, Vol. X, pp. 1–84.Google Scholar
Péron, & Lesueur, , 1809. Histoire généerate et particuliére de tous les animaux qui composent la famille des MédusesM. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris, Tome XIV, pp. 312–66.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1938. On the nematocysts of Hydromedusae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIII, pp. 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhöffen, E., 1911. Die Anthomedusen und Leptomedusen der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition 1898–1899. Wiss. Ergeb. Deutsch. Tiefsee-Exped. Valdivia 1898–1899, Bd. XIX (1925), Heft 5, pp. 193–233.Google Scholar
Weill, Robert, 1934. Contribution à l'étude des cnidaires et de leurs nématocystes. II. Valeur taxonomique du cnidome. Trav. Stat. Zool. Wimereux, Tome XI, pp. 349–701.Google Scholar