Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:23:50.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paratectonatica tigrina (Gastropoda: Naticidae) adjusts its predation tactics depending on the chosen prey and their shell weight relative to its own

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Fumio Takeshita Open the ORCID record for Fumio Takeshita [Opens in a new window]  and
Takumi Maekawa
Fumio Takeshita*
Affiliation:
Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History and Human History, 2-4-1 Higashida, Yahatahigashi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
Takumi Maekawa
Affiliation:
Osaka Museum of Natural History, 1-23 Nagai Park, Higashi-Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Fumio Takeshita, E-mail: takeshita_f@kmnh.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paratectonatica tigrina employs three predatory tactics against bivalve prey: wall-drilling, edge-drilling and non-drilling (suffocation) tactics. In this study, we conducted laboratory experiments to examine the predator–prey interactions between the naticid gastropod P. tigrina and two species of bivalve prey, Ruditapes philippinarum and Meretrix lusoria, and to investigate how predatory tactics differ for the bivalve species. Predation success increased with the shell weight ratio between predator and prey, however, there was no significant difference among prey species. The shell weight ratio significantly differed (P < 0.05) between predatory tactics against R. philippinarum, but not against M. lusoria, implying that P. tigrina determines its predatory tactics based on the shell weight ratio for R. philippinarum. However, we observed that feeding duration was not influenced by shell weight ratio or prey species, even though data were separated for each predatory tactic. These results suggest that there is no difference in feeding efficiency based on shell weight ratio between prey species and between predatory tactics. Paratectonatica tigrina may alter its predatory tactics suitably depending on the prey species and the relative size difference, despite the same feeding efficiency.

Keywords

Bivalve preydrill holeMeretrix lusoriamoon snailNaticidaeRuditapes philippinarumshell weight ratiosuffocation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 100 , Issue 6 , September 2020 , pp. 921 - 926
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell, AD (1960) Observations on predation of Venus striatula (da Costa) by Natica alderi (Forbes). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 34, 157–164.Google Scholar
Ansell, AD (1982 a) Experimental studies of a benthic predator-prey relationship. I. Feeding, growth, and egg-collar production in long-term cultures of the gastropod drill Polinices alderi (Forbes) feeding on the bivalve Tellina tenuis (da Costa). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 56, 235–255.10.1016/0022-0981(81)90192-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, AD (1982 b) Experimental studies of a benthic predator-prey relationship. II. Energetics of growth and reproduction, and food-conversion efficiencies, in long-term cultures of the gastropod drill Polinices alderi (Forbes) feeding on the bivalve Tellina tenuis da Costa. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 61, 1–29.10.1016/0022-0981(82)90019-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, AD and Morton, B (1985) Aspects of naticid predation in Hong Kong with special reference to the defensive adaptations of Bassina (Callanaitis) calophylla (Bivalvia). In Morton, B and Dudgeon, D (eds), Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 635–660.Google Scholar
Ansell, AD and Morton, B (1987) Alternative predation tactics of a tropical naticid gastropod. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 111, 109–119.10.1016/0022-0981(87)90049-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, AJ (1982) Predation by Natica maculosa Lamarck (Naticidae: Gastropoda) upon the trochacean gastropod Umbonium vestiarium (L.) on a Malaysian shore. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 64, 71–89.10.1016/0022-0981(82)90068-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, KM (1997) Size-specific aspects of the foraging ecology of the southern oyster drill Stramonita haemastoma (Kool 1987). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 214, 249–262.10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02775-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiba, T and Sato, SI (2012) Size-selective predation and drillhole-site selectivity in Euspira fortunei (Gastropoda: Naticidae): implications for ecological and palaeoecological studies. Journal of Molluscan Studies 78, 205–212.10.1093/mollus/eys002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiba, T and Sato, SI (2013) Invasion of Laguncula pulchella (Gastropoda: Naticidae) and predator–prey interactions with bivalves on the Tona coast, Miyagi prefecture, northern Japan. Biological Invasions 15, 587–598.10.1007/s10530-012-0310-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiba, T and Sato, SI (2014) Invasion of a naticid predator and associated changes in death assemblages of bivalve prey in northern Japan: implications for palaeoecological studies. Lethaia 47, 4–14.10.1111/let.12033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, NB, Krebs, JR and West, SA (2012) An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 4th Edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dietl, GP and Herbert, GS (2005) Influence of alternative shell-drilling behaviours on attack duration of the predatory snail, Chicoreus dilectus. Journal of Zoology 265, 201–206.10.1017/S0952836904006223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietl, GP, Herbert, GS and Vermeij, GJ (2004) Reduced competition and altered feeding behavior among marine snails after a mass extinction. Science 306, 2229–2231.10.1126/science.1106182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasegawa, H and Sato, SI (2009) Predatory behaviour of the naticid Euspira fortunei: why does it drill the left shell valve of Ruditapes philippinarum? Journal of Molluscan Studies 75, 147–151.10.1093/mollus/eyp010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huelsken, T (2011) First evidence of drilling predation by Conuber sordidus (Swainson, 1821) (Gastropoda: Naticidae) on soldier crabs (Crustacea: Mictyridae). Molluscan Research 31, 125–135.Google Scholar
Hutchings, JA and Herbert, GS (2013) No honor among snails: conspecific competition leads to incomplete drill holes by a naticid gastropod. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 379, 32–38.10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, S (2004) Initial predation and parasitism by muricid whelks demonstrated by the correspondence between drilled holes and their apparent enveloper. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 305, 233–245.10.1016/j.jembe.2003.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsley-Smith, PR, Richardson, CA and Seed, R (2003) Stereotypic and size-selective predation in Polinices pulchellus (Gastropoda: Naticidae) Risso 1826. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 295, 173–190.10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00294-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondal, S, Hutchings, JA and Herbert, GS (2014) A note on edge drilling predation by naticid gastropods. Journal of Molluscan Studies 80, 206–212.10.1093/mollus/eyu001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, B (2008) Biology of the swash-riding moon snail Polinices incei (Gastropoda: Naticidae) predating the pipi, Donax deltoides (Bivalvia: Donacidae), on wave-exposed sandy beaches of North Stradbroke Island, Queensland, Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum – Nature 54, 303–322.Google Scholar
Morton, B (2017) Prey size and drill hole stereotypy by Conuber incei (Gastropoda: Naticidae) attacking Paphies elongata (Bivalvia: Mesodesmatidae) on surf beaches in Queensland, Australia. Journal of Conchology 42, 499–506.Google Scholar
Pahari, A, Mondal, S, Bardhan, S, Sarkar, D, Saha, S and Buragohain, D (2016) Subaerial naticid gastropod drilling predation by Natica tigrina on the intertidal molluscan community of Chandipur, Eastern Coast of India. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 451, 110–123.10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.03.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, S, Herbert, GS and Dietl, GP (2014) Predator-induced edge-drilling behaviour of Chicoreus dilectus (Gastropoda: Muricidae). Journal of Molluscan Studies 81, 233–237.10.1093/mollus/eyu085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peharda, M and Morton, B (2006) Experimental prey species preferences of Hexaplex trunculus (Gastropoda: Muricidae) and predator–prey interactions with the black mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia: Mytilidae). Marine Biology 148, 1011–1019.10.1007/s00227-005-0148-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Rodrigues, CL, Nojima, S and Kikuchi, T (1987) Mechanics of prey size preference in the gastropod Neverita didyma preying on the bivalve Ruditapes philippinarum. Marine Ecology Progress Series 40, 87–93.10.3354/meps040087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Y (1954) On the holes of the clam shell (Venerupis semidecussata) bored by a screw-borer (Natica maculosa), with note on its radula. Venus 18, 34–39. [In Japanese].Google Scholar
Tomiyama, T (2018) Lethal and non-lethal effects of an invasive naticid gastropod on the production of a native clam. Biological Invasions 20, 1–10.10.1007/s10530-018-1675-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visaggi, CC, Dietl, GP and Kelley, PH (2013) Testing the influence of sediment depth on drilling behaviour of Neverita duplicata (Gastropoda: Naticidae), with a review of alternative modes of predation by naticids. Journal of Molluscan Studies 79, 310–322.10.1093/mollus/eyt023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, T (2004) Prey composition and prey selectivity of an intertidal generalist predator, Muricodrupa fusca (Küster) (Muricidae). Marine Ecology 25, 35–49.10.1111/j.1439-0485.2004.00012.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takeshita and Maekawa supplementary material

Takeshita and Maekawa supplementary material

Download Takeshita and Maekawa supplementary material(Video)
Video 41.5 MB