Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:59:44.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partial fin-clipping as an effective tool for tissue sampling seahorses, Hippocampus spp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Lucy C. Woodall ,
Rachel Jones ,
Brian Zimmerman ,
Samantha Guillaume ,
Teague Stubbington ,
Paul Shaw  and
Heather J. Koldewey
Lucy C. Woodall*
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, FK9 4LA
Rachel Jones
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY
Brian Zimmerman
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY
Samantha Guillaume
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY
Teague Stubbington
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY
Paul Shaw
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
Heather J. Koldewey
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: L.C. Woodall, Zoology Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD email: l.woodall@nhm.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Partial fin-clipping is a non-lethal sampling technique commonly used to sample tissue for molecular genetic studies of fish. The effect of this technique was tested on seahorses (Hippocampus spp.) as they have several peculiar biological characteristics when compared with other fish and are on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Partial fin-clipping of the seahorse dorsal fin was evaluated on Hippocampus kuda. The fish were assessed for short-term effects (fin re-growth time) as well as the longer term effects (growth and mortality) of partial fin clipping over a four month period. Total fin re-growth occurred between 2 and 4 weeks with no significant difference observed in the fin re-growth time between sexes. There was no significant difference between the mortality rate/growth rate of clipped versus unclipped seahorses. Results indicate partial fin-clipping has no significant effect on seahorses, and should be considered as a useful method for tissue sampling.

Keywords

partial fin-clippingseahorseHippocampus kudasamplinggenetics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 92 , Issue 6 , September 2012 , pp. 1427 - 1432
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basavaraju, Y., Renuka Devi, B.S., Mukthayakka, G., Purushotham Reddy, L., Mair, G.C., Roderick, E.E. and Penman, D.J. (1998) Evaluation of marking and tagging methods for genetic studies in carp. Journal of Bioscience 5, 585–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R.W. (1976) On seahorse locomotion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 56, 939–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campanella, J.J. and Smalley, J.V. (2006) A minimally invasive method of piscine tissue collection and an analysis of long-term field storage conditions for samples. BMC Genetics 7, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, C.E., Austin, J.D., Jelks, H.L. and Jordan, F. (2008) Effects of fin clipping on survival and position-holding behaviour of Brown Darters, Etheostoma edwini. Copeia 4, 916–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coble, D.W. (1967) Effects of fin-clipping on mortality and growth of Yellow Perch with a review of similar investigations. Journal of Wildlife Management 31, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coble, D.W. (1971) Effects of fin clipping and other factors in survival and growth of smallmouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 100, 460–473.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, G.A. and Sheehan, R.J. (1999) Survival, growth and mark persistence in juvenile black crappies marked with fin clips, freeze brands, or oxytetracycline. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19, 824–827.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consi, T.R., Seifert, P.A., Triantafyllou, M.S. and Edelman, E.R. (2001) The dorsal fin engine of the seahorse (Hippocampus sp.). Journal of Morphology 258, 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, R.W. (1958) Behaviour, growth and mortality in the Bluegill, Lepomis marochirus Rafinesque, following fin clipping. Copeia 4, 330–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J.M.R. (2006) Visible implant elastomer color determination, tag visibility and tag loss: potential sources of error for mark-recapture studies. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J.M.R. and Vincent, A.C.J. (2006) Life history of an unusual marine fish: survival, growth and movement patterns of Hippocampus guttulatus, Cuvier 1829. Journal of Fish Biology 68, 707–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekes, P., Taborsky, M. and Kohler, U. (1999) Reproduction parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behavioural Ecology 10, 510–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S.J. and Vincent, A.C.J. (2004) Life history and ecology of seahorses: implications for conservation and management. Journal of Fish Biology 65, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjerde, B. and Refstie, T. (1985) The effect of fin-clipping on growth rate, survival and sexual maturity of rainbow trout. Aquaculture 73, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, H.J. and Nawrocki, L.W. (1995) A rapid method for detecting mitochondrial DNA variation in the brown trout. Journal of Fish Biology 46, 360–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, B.O. and Ugedal, O. (2008) Effects of different kinds of fin-clipping on over-winter survival and growth of fingerling brown trout, Salmo trutta L., stocked in small streams in Norway. Aquaculture Research 19, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katano, O. and Uchida, K. (2006) Effect of partial fin clipping as a marking technique on the growth of four freshwater fish. Aquaculture Science 54, 577–578.Google Scholar
Koldewey, H.J. and Martin-Smith, K.M. (2010) A global review of seahorse aquaculture. Aquaculture 302, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lourie, S.A. (2003) Fin-clipping procedure for seahorses. Available from http://www.projectseahorse.org (accessed 12 February 2010).Google Scholar
Lourie, S.A., Green, D.M. and Vincent, A.C.J. (2005) Dispersal, habitat differences, and comparative phylogeography of Southeast Asian seahorses (Syngnathidae: Hippocampus). Molecular Ecology 14, 1073–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lourie, S.A. and Vincent, A.C.J. (2004) A marine fish follows Wallace's Line: the phylogeography of the three-spot seahorse (Hippocampus trimaculatus, Syngnathidae, Teleostei) in Southeast Asia. Journal of Biogeography 31, 1975–1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lourie, S.A, Vincent, A.C.J. and Hall, H.J. (1999) Seahorses: an identification guide to the world's species and their conservation. London: Project Seahorse.Google Scholar
Lucentini, L., Caporali, S., Palomba, A., Lancioni, H. and Panara, F. (2006) A comparison of conservative DNA extraction methods from fins and scales of freshwater fish: a useful tool for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 7, 1009–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, P. and Wright, J.M. (1995) The evolving technology of DNA fingerprinting and its application to fisheries and aquaculture. Journal of Fish Biology 47, 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, T.C. and Fox, M.G. (2002) Effect of fin clipping on over winter growth and survival of age-0 walleyes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22, 1290–1294.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricker, W.E. (1949) Effects of removal of fins upon the growth and survival of spiny-rayed fishes. Journal of Wildlife Management 13, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, J.G., Cribbs, J.E., Fienberg, H.G., Hulburd, G.C., Katz, L.S. and Palumbi, S.R. (2008) The tip of the tail: molecular identification of seahorses for sale in apothecary shops and curio stores in California. Conservation Genetics 9, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, U.H. (1997) Mark retention in fin-clipped Pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887). Revista UNIMAR 19, 413–419.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M.K., Luikart, G. and Waples, R.S. (2007) Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teske, P.R., Cherry, M.I. and Matthee, C.A. (2004) The evolutionary history of seahorses (Syngnathidae: Hippocampus): molecular data suggest a West Pacific origin and two invasions of the Atlantic Ocean. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30, 273–286.Google ScholarPubMed
Teske, P.R., Hamilton, H., Palsboll, P., Choo, C.K., Gabr, H., Lourie, S.A., Santos, M., Sreepada, A., Cherry, M.I. and Matthee, C.A. (2005) Molecular evidence for long-distance colonization in an Indo-Pacific seahorse lineage. Marine Ecology Progress Series 286, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J.A., Hirethota, P.S. and Eggold, B.T. (2005) A comparison of elastomer marks and fin clips as marking techniques for walleye. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasko, A.-P., Martins, C., Oliveira, C. and Foresti, F. (2003) Non-destructive genetic sampling in fish. An improved method for DNA extraction from fish fins and scales. Hereditas 138, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, D. and Wahle, R.J. (1969) Effect of fin clipping on survival of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 26, 1263–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnepenninckx, B., Backeljau, T. and Dewachter, R. (1993) Extraction of high molecular-weight DNA from molluscs. Trends in Genetics 9, 407.Google ScholarPubMed
Woods, C.M.C. and Martin-Smith, K.M. (2004) Visible implant fluorescent elastomer tagging of the big-bellied seahorse, Hippocampus abdominalis. Fisheries Research 66, 363–371.Google Scholar