Introduction
Interactions and competition between sympatric species of cetaceans have often been recorded in the wild (Jefferson et al., Reference Jefferson, Stacey and Baird1991; Ross and Wilson, Reference Ross and Wilson1996; Weller et al., Reference Weller, Würsig, Whitehead, Norris, Lynn, Davis, Clauss and Brown1996; Herzing and Johnsonz, Reference Herzing and Johnsonz1997; Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012). Mixed-species groups can coexist for some time within the same area (Boys, Reference Boys2015), sharing and partitioning resources and providing reciprocal benefits in foraging techniques (Norris and Dohl, Reference Norris and Dohl1979). Competition, on the contrary, can potentially lead to aggressive behaviours and interactions between individuals (Shane, Reference Shane1995; Herzing et al., Reference Herzing, Moewe and Brunnick2003), causing serious injuries and sometimes even resulting in the killing of competitors (Patterson et al., Reference Patterson, Reid, Wilson, Grellier, Ross and Thompson1998; Dunn et al., Reference Dunn, Barco, Pabst and McLellan2002; Díaz-Delgado et al., Reference Díaz-Delgado, Fernández, Sierra, Sacchini, Andrada, Vela, Quesada-Canales, Paz, Zucca, Groch and Arbelo2018).
Attacks towards both conspecifics (‘intraspecific interactions’) and other cetacean species (‘interspecific interactions’) attributed to common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), hereafter referred to as ‘bottlenose dolphin’, have been reported worldwide, some of which resulted in a fatal outcome (Ross and Wilson, Reference Ross and Wilson1996; Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012; Crespo-Picazo et al., Reference Crespo-Picazo, Rubio-Guerri, Jiménez, Aznar, Marco-Cabedo, Melero, Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Gozalbes and García-Párraga2021).
According to several authors, possible explanations proposed for bottlenose dolphins' aggressivity towards allospecificity are competition for food and feeding interference (Spitz et al., Reference Spitz, Rousseau and Ridoux2006; Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012; Methion and Díaz López, Reference Methion and Díaz López2021), enhancing fighting and infanticide skills (Patterson et al., Reference Patterson, Reid, Wilson, Grellier, Ross and Thompson1998; Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012), sexual frustration during periods of limited access to females and physiological response to stress (Ross and Wilson, Reference Ross and Wilson1996; Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012). On the contrary, predation is not usually considered a valid hypothesis due to the lack of evidence in the reported cases (Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012). Infanticide in bottlenose dolphins was observed in different areas worldwide such as Scotland (Patterson et al., Reference Patterson, Reid, Wilson, Grellier, Ross and Thompson1998; Robinson, Reference Robinson2014), Virginia (Dunn et al., Reference Dunn, Barco, Pabst and McLellan2002), Spain (Díaz López et al., Reference Díaz López, López, Methion and Covelo2018) and Belize (Ramos et al., Reference Ramos, Szczepaniak, Kaplan and Reiss2022) but this behaviour is normally described towards conspecifics. Currently, the most accredited hypothesis of aggressive behaviour is a consequence of competition for available resources in areas regularly used by bottlenose dolphins for feeding (Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012; Methion and Díaz López, Reference Methion and Díaz López2021).
Despite few direct observations of interspecific attacks by bottlenose dolphins (e.g. Methion and Díaz López, Reference Methion and Díaz López2021), the majority of available data on interactions has been collected through the post-mortem analysis of stranded cetaceans (Boys, Reference Boys2015). Direct observations and necropsies revealed a wide range of cetacean species being attacked by T. truncatus including harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) (Ross and Wilson, Reference Ross and Wilson1996; Patterson et al., Reference Patterson, Reid, Wilson, Grellier, Ross and Thompson1998; Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012; Boys, Reference Boys2015), estuarine dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) (Wedekin et al., Reference Wedekin, Daura-Jorge and Simões-Lopes2005), Commerson's dolphins (Cephalorhynchus commersonii) (Coscarella and Crespo, Reference Coscarella and Crespo2010), Atlantic spotted dolphins (Stenella frontalis) (Herzing and Johnsonz, Reference Herzing and Johnsonz1997; Herzing et al., Reference Herzing, Moewe and Brunnick2003), Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus) (Barnett et al., Reference Barnett, Davison, Deaville, Monies, Loveridge, Tregenza and Jepson2009), long-finned pilot whale (Globicephala melas) (Barnett et al., Reference Barnett, Davison, Deaville, Monies, Loveridge, Tregenza and Jepson2009), striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) (Barnett et al., Reference Barnett, Davison, Deaville, Monies, Loveridge, Tregenza and Jepson2009) and short-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) (Barnett et al., Reference Barnett, Davison, Deaville, Monies, Loveridge, Tregenza and Jepson2009; Methion and Díaz López, Reference Methion and Díaz López2021).
In the Mediterranean Sea, episodes of interspecific attacks appear as sporadic behaviours, and were reported only in Spanish and French waters, addressed towards both striped and Risso's dolphins (Dhermain, Reference Dhermain2020; Puig-Lozano et al., Reference Puig-Lozano, Fernández, Saavedra, Tejedor, Sierra, De La Fuente, Xuriach, Diaz-Delgado, Rivero, Andrada, Bernaldo De Quiros and Arbelo2020; Crespo-Picazo et al., Reference Crespo-Picazo, Rubio-Guerri, Jiménez, Aznar, Marco-Cabedo, Melero, Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Gozalbes and García-Párraga2021; Gannier, Reference Gannier2021).
In the Ligurian Sea, inside the Pelagos Sanctuary (northwestern Mediterranean Sea), bottlenose dolphins are regularly seen all year round in coastal waters and use this area for feeding and nursing their calves, both in the eastern (Gnone et al., Reference Gnone, Bellingeri, Dhermain, Dupraz, Nuti, Bedocchi, Moulins, Rosso, Alessi, McCrea, Azzellino, Airoldi, Portunato, Laran, David, Di Meglio, Bonelli, Montesi, Trucchi, Fossa and Wurtz2011) and western sides of the region (Ascheri et al., Reference Ascheri, Fontanesi, Ballardini, Nani and Alessi2022). The striped dolphin, on the contrary, is considered mainly a pelagic species, even if it can occasionally occur in coastal waters and in the deep coastal submarine canyons characterising the western Ligurian Sea (Moulins et al., Reference Moulins, Rosso, Ballardini and Würtz2008; Panigada et al., Reference Panigada, Zanardelli, MacKenzie, Donovan, Mélin and Hammond2008).
This area, in fact, presents a very narrow continental platform and the coastal and pelagic habitats are strictly interconnected through the morphology of the seafloor. This allows an ecological overlap between the two species, as described in French and Spanish waters (Norris and Dohl, Reference Norris and Dohl1979; Crespo-Picazo et al., Reference Crespo-Picazo, Rubio-Guerri, Jiménez, Aznar, Marco-Cabedo, Melero, Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Gozalbes and García-Párraga2021; Gannier, Reference Gannier2021).
In this study, we report the pathologic features observed in a stranded dead striped dolphin in the Pelagos Sanctuary, Italy, related to external and internal traumatic lesions compatible with a traumatic interaction with bottlenose dolphins. Reporting this event is highly significant to add new valuable information to the literature regarding the occurrence of these behaviours, which are rarely observed in the wild (Boys, Reference Boys2015) and often difficult to evidence through necropsies due to the lack of specific diagnostic protocol (Puig-Lozano et al., Reference Puig-Lozano, Fernández, Saavedra, Tejedor, Sierra, De La Fuente, Xuriach, Diaz-Delgado, Rivero, Andrada, Bernaldo De Quiros and Arbelo2020).
Material and methods
On 1st November 2020, an adult female striped dolphin was found dead on Bergeggi beach (SV) (44.15N, 8.26E), along the Western Ligurian Sea coast. These waters are part of a marine protected area, named Pelagos Sanctuary, established in 1999 for the protection and conservation of cetaceans and classified as a Specially Protected Area of Mediterranean Importance (SPAMI) in 2002.
A complete post-mortem examination according to standard protocols (Ijsseldijk et al., Reference Ijsseldijk, Brownlow and Mazzariol2019) was carried out the day after the stranding at the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Diagnostic Laboratory of Imperia. Twenty-eight morphometric measures were taken following the Italian National Stranding Data Bank protocol (BDS – Banca Dati Spiaggiamenti) developed by the University of Pavia and the Natural History Museum of Milan following Cagnolaro et al. (Reference Cagnolaro, Cozzi, Magnaghi, Podestà, Poggi and Tangerini1986). The age class was categorized based on total body length, according to Geraci and Lounsbury (Reference Geraci and Lounsbury2005) and Carlini et al. (Reference Carlini, De Francesco and Libera2014).
External and internal structures and abnormal findings were fully described, photographed and sampled. Furthermore, external lesions compatible with rake marks were further analysed to assess any possible inter- and intraspecific interaction. For this purpose, measurements of the space between parallel wounds were evaluated from pictures taken perpendicularly to the marks. Using Photoshop, the distance between the parallel wounds and the height of the dorsal fin was calculated and then rescaled through a proportion with real measurements of the dorsal fin taken during the necropsy. Measures obtained were later compared with the inter-tooth distances of different cetacean species reported in the literature.
During the necropsy, tissue samples of all the major organs and lesions were collected and split into aliquots for subsequent analyses: one was kept frozen at −20 °C for microbiological and toxicological investigations; one was kept frozen at −80 °C for biomolecular analyses, and the other was preserved in 10% buffered formalin for histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) investigations. Gastric content was collected and frozen to be preserved for later analysis (weighed, filtered and sorted).
Blood serum, aqueous humour, pericardial fluid and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were collected and kept frozen at −20 °C for serological investigations.
Representative tissues including the brain, lung, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, mammary gland, adrenal gland and stomach were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. These tissues were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 4 ± 2 μm, stained with haematoxylin and eosin and examined through a light microscope. Different areas from the brain were sampled and examined, including the basal nuclei, thalamus, mesencephalon, pons, obex, and frontal, parietal, occipital and cerebellar cortex. IHC for Morbillivirus was performed on tissue sections including the brain, lung, spleen and kidney, using a monoclonal anti-Canine distemper virus antibody (VMRD, Pullman, WA, USA) (Di Guardo et al., Reference Di-Guardo, Proietto, Di Francesco, Marsilio, Zaccaroni, Scaravelli, Mignone, Garibaldi, Kennedy, Forster, Iulini, Bozzetta and Casalone2010). Toxoplasma gondii IHC was carried out on the nine aforementioned brain tissues using a polyclonal serum of caprine origin (VMRD) (Di Guardo et al., Reference Di-Guardo, Proietto, Di Francesco, Marsilio, Zaccaroni, Scaravelli, Mignone, Garibaldi, Kennedy, Forster, Iulini, Bozzetta and Casalone2010).
Tissue samples including those of the brain, lung, prescapular lymph node, liver, spleen, tonsils, kidney and bladder were processed for standard aerobic, anaerobic and microaerobic (5% CO2) bacterial culture and identification, by biochemical and/or molecular analyses. Following international recommendations (OIE 2018) samples from target tissues underwent specific bacteriological procedures to screen Listeria spp., Salmonella spp. and Brucella spp. The presence of anti-T. gondii, anti-Brucella spp. and anti-Morbillivirus antibodies was investigated in blood serum, aqueous humour, pericardial fluid and CSF (Hernández-Mora et al., Reference Hernández-Mora, González-Barrientos, Morales, Chaves-Olarte, Guzmán-Verri, Baquero-Calvo, De-Miguel, Marín, Blasco and Moreno2008; Di Guardo et al., Reference Di-Guardo, Proietto, Di Francesco, Marsilio, Zaccaroni, Scaravelli, Mignone, Garibaldi, Kennedy, Forster, Iulini, Bozzetta and Casalone2010). Molecular detection of Dolphin morbillivirus (DMV) (Verna et al., Reference Verna, Giorda, Miceli, Rizzo, Pautasso, Romano, Iulini, Pintore, Mignone, Grattarola, Bozzetta, Varello, Dondo, Casalone and Goria2017), Herpesvirus (HV) (Vandevanter et al., Reference Vandevanter, Warrener, Bennett, Schultz, Coulter, Garber and Rose1996), T. gondii (Vitale et al., Reference Vitale, Galluzzo, Currò, Gozdzik, Schillaci and Presti2013) and Brucella spp. (Bounaadja et al., Reference Bounaadja, Albert, Chénais, Hénault, Zygmunt, Poliak and Garin-Bastuji2009) was routinely achieved on target tissues available, including the brain, lung, tonsils, prescapular lymph node, liver, spleen and kidney for DMV, brain, lung, prescapular lymph node, spleen and kidney for HV, brain, prescapular lymph node, liver, spleen, heart and muscle for T. gondii, and brain, lung, tonsils, prescapular lymph node, spleen and kidney for Brucella spp.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethanes (DDTs) as well as extracted organic material per cent (EOM%) were measured in the blubber. Organochlorine compound (OC) analyses were made according to the Environmental Protection Agency method 8081/8082, with modifications (Marsili and Focardi, Reference Marsili and Focardi1997). The OC levels are expressed in ng/g dry weight (d.w.).
Finally, toxicological stress was evaluated using a theoretical model where the value of the canonical variable (CAN) represents the potential hazard from the sum of DDTs and PCBs and is evaluated with a canonical analysis procedure (Marsili et al., Reference Marsili, D'Agostino, Bucalossi, Malatesta and Fossi2004).
Results
The carcass, in a post-mortem condition code 2 (fresh), weighed 74 kg and its total length measured 200 cm, thus resulting in its classification as an adult. It was a lactating female, with a moderate nutritional status.
Severe multifocal acute skin lesions, consisting of three to ten linear and parallel fresh lacerations (rake marks), spaced 1–1.2 cm apart were found (Figure 1). These lesions were localized on the posterior part of the body, the dorsal fin, the fluke and around the genital area (Figure 1A–C). Two additional lesions of around 10 cm in length showing blood leaking were present transversally with respect to the anal opening (Figure 1D).
Internal macroscopic examination revealed multifocal severe vascular changes consisting of haematomas and haemorrhages in the subcutaneous space and muscles (left supraorbital region, left temporomandibular region, dorsal and thoracic regions), along with multiple tears within the intercostal muscle tissue (Figure 2A, B, E). Moreover, multiple bilateral contiguous vertebral and rib fractures (last 5–6 ribs and transverse processes of the thoracic vertebrae) were found in the medial-caudal side (Figure 2C, D), along with a haemothorax associated with a perforation of the pleural and pulmonary parenchyma, more evident in the right lung (Figure 2F, G). Other macroscopic findings included a moderate parasitic infection by Clistobothrium delphini and C. grimaldii merocercoids, especially around the genital area, bloody milk in the mammary gland, enlargement and readness of prescapular lymph nodes (4.5 cm in length), splenic sub-capsular haemorrhages, five nodules (diameter of 1–5 cm) of Pholeter gastrophilus at gastric level in the main stomach and haemorrhagic CSF. The pyloric stomach contained scanty material (0.55 kg), represented by bones and otoliths, correlated to a non-recent meal. Microscopically, diffuse oedema in the white matter and microhaemorrhages were observed in the brain. A severe pulmonary haemorrhage and moderate granulomatous bronchopneumonia of parasitic origin (nematodes of the family Pseudaliidae) were evident in the lungs. Furthermore, a moderate bronchiolar sphincter contraction was observed. A mild multifocal chronic cholangitis, large haemorrhagic areas, predominantly subcapsular, with lymphoid depletion of the germinal centres with hyalinosis in the spleen, and marked hyperaemia with haemorrhagic foci in the myocardium, were also detected. Vascular congestion and small corticomedullary haemorrhages of the adrenal gland, and a moderate diffuse congestion of the vessels and glomerular capillaries in the kidney were additionally found.
A Gram-negative bacterium, Empedobacter brevis, was isolated by aerobic and microaerobic culture from the mammary gland, liver, lung, spleen and prescapular lymph node. No other significant bacteria, including Brucella spp., Listeria spp. and Salmonella spp., were isolated. No IHC evidence of morbilliviral and T. gondii-specific antigens were found in the tissues examined.
The levels of HCB, PCBs and DDTs, expressed in ng/g dry weight (d.w.) (HCB: 94.43; PCBs: 66541.03; DDTs: 2898.37) and the canonical variable value (CAN) = −0.16, did not reveal the presence of hazardous levels of OC pollutants (CAN > 0.47). The EOM% was 70.71, showing a mild depletion of the blubber layer. No biomolecular evidence of DMV, HV, T. gondii or Brucella spp. was found. No evidence of anti-T. gondii, anti-Brucella spp. and anti-Morbillivirus antibodies was demonstrated in aqueous humour, serum, pericardial fluid and CSF.
Discussion
The carcass of the striped dolphin reported in this work showed multiple, multifocal external and internal injuries, respectively consisting of a series of parallel lacerations spaced 1–1.2 cm apart (acute tooth rake marks) and of subcutaneous and muscular haematomas and haemorrhages, multiple vertebral and rib fractures, haemothorax and lung laceration. All main lesions detected were consistent with the occurrence of a traumatic event, compatible with social interspecific behaviour, considered to be the leading cause of death due to the severity of internal injuries.
Spacing between the lacerations was compatible with the interdental space for a single odontocete species in the western Mediterranean Sea, the bottlenose dolphin, the same attacker species reported by Barnett et al. (Reference Barnett, Davison, Deaville, Monies, Loveridge, Tregenza and Jepson2009) in UK waters and Puig-Lozano et al. (Reference Puig-Lozano, Fernández, Saavedra, Tejedor, Sierra, De La Fuente, Xuriach, Diaz-Delgado, Rivero, Andrada, Bernaldo De Quiros and Arbelo2020) in Spain. Some of these scars showed an acute change in directionality, typical of aggressive interactions of bottlenose dolphins on harbour porpoises, as reported by Ross and Wilson, (Reference Ross and Wilson1996). Most importantly, tooth rakes were present on less than 50% of the body and prevalently on the back of the animal. The posterior position of most of these rakes can be likely explained by chasing behaviours carried out by bottlenose dolphins during the attack.
Furthermore, all the major internal traumatic findings may be attributable to a fatal interspecific aggression. The thoracic region, the most affected portion of the body, presented several subcutaneous focal/multifocal haemorrhages and haematomas, consistent with blunt traumas (multidirectional), several vertebral and rib fractures and pulmonary perforation, as in Ross and Wilson, (Reference Ross and Wilson1996), Barnett et al. (Reference Barnett, Davison, Deaville, Monies, Loveridge, Tregenza and Jepson2009) and Puig-Lozano et al. (Reference Puig-Lozano, Fernández, Saavedra, Tejedor, Sierra, De La Fuente, Xuriach, Diaz-Delgado, Rivero, Andrada, Bernaldo De Quiros and Arbelo2020).
In addition, microscopic findings of mild corticomedullary adrenal haemorrhages and a moderate bronchiolar sphincter contraction, previously reported in association with stressful agonal events or in severely polytraumatized animals (Puig-Lozano et al., Reference Puig-Lozano, Fernández, Saavedra, Tejedor, Sierra, De La Fuente, Xuriach, Diaz-Delgado, Rivero, Andrada, Bernaldo De Quiros and Arbelo2020), were also evident.
The significance of the systemic infection by Empedobacter brevis, an environmental Gram-negative bacillus included within the family Flavobacteriaceae, occasionally involved in nosocomial infections in debilitated and immune-compromised humans (Bokhari et al., Reference Bokhari, Abbas, Singh, Cindrich and Zeana2015; Basani and Aepala, Reference Basani and Aepala2018) and never reported in marine mammals (Bogomolni et al., Reference Bogomolni, Gast, Ellis, Dennett, Pugliares, Lentell and Moore2008), is unclear. No associated signs of bacterial disease were indeed observed at macroscopic and microscopic levels. The multiorgan pattern of infection, including the mammary gland, suggests a possible ascendent route of infection, likely representing a secondary/opportunistic infection.
Stomach content was present only in the pyloric part, indicating a non-recent meal, but no additional findings suggested a compromised health status of the animal.
As evidenced by several sources (Grattarola et al., Reference Grattarola, Giorda, Iulini, Pintore, Pautasso, Zoppi, Goria, Romano, Peletto, Varello, Garibaldi, Garofolo, Di Francesco, Marsili, Bozzetta, Di Guardo, Dondo, Mignone and Casalone2016, Reference Grattarola, Gallina, Giorda, Pautasso, Ballardini, Iulini, Varello, Goria, Peletto, Masoero, Seracca, Romano, Dondo, Zoppi, Garibaldi, Scaglione, Marsili, Di Guardo, Lettini, Mignone, Fernandez and Casalone2019; Giorda et al., Reference Giorda, Ballardini, Di Guardo, Pintore, Grattarola, Iulini, Mignone, Goria, Serracca, Varello, Dondo, Acutis, Garibaldi, Scaglione, Gustinelli, Mazzariol, Di Francesco, Tittarelli, Casalone and Pautasso2017, Reference Giorda, Romani-Cremaschi, Marsh, Grattarola, Iulini, Pautasso, Varello, Berio, Gazzuola, Marsili, Di Francesco, Goria, Verna, Audino, Peletto, Caramelli, Fernández-Escobar, Sierra, Fernandez, Calero-Bernal and Casalone2021; C.Re.Di.Ma., 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, accessed online 17 December 2022) cetaceans in the Pelagos Sanctuary frequently deal with pathogens, which may adversely affect their individual health, sometimes experiencing toxicological stress related to immunotoxic levels of OC pollutants. This individual, instead, did not reveal a compromised health status, although the unhazardous levels of OC pollutants detected could have been influenced by the detoxification mechanism that occurred during the lactation (Aguilar et al., Reference Aguilar, Borrell and Pastor1999; Genov et al., Reference Genov, Jepson, Barber, Hace, Gaspari, Centrih, Lesjak and Kotnjek2019).
Because of the entity, positions and numbers of the severe traumatic findings found, we excluded other possible traumatic events involved, such as vessel collision, other predator attacks and fishery interaction (Puig-Lozano et al., Reference Puig-Lozano, Fernández, Saavedra, Tejedor, Sierra, De La Fuente, Xuriach, Diaz-Delgado, Rivero, Andrada, Bernaldo De Quiros and Arbelo2020; Crespo-Picazo et al., Reference Crespo-Picazo, Rubio-Guerri, Jiménez, Aznar, Marco-Cabedo, Melero, Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Gozalbes and García-Párraga2021). Collision, in fact, usually produces unidirectional contusions, haemorrhages and haematomas, with the possibility of multiple, evenly spaced, parallel cuts caused by propellers, located mostly on the dorsal parts of the body (Townsend and Staggs, Reference Townsend and Staggs2020). In the event of shark attacks, the external wounds are usually deeper, spaced and with a circular shape corresponding to the shark's jaws (Townsend and Staggs, Reference Townsend and Staggs2020). In case of interaction with fisheries, acute linear marks and wounds are found together with bone fractures but are always associated with direct certain and pathognomonic evidence (i.e. presence of fishing gears on the body, capture myopathy, mutilation) and other consistent findings (i.e. gas bubbles in main vessels, good nutritional status, presence of fresh stomach content) (Ijsseldijk et al., Reference Ijsseldijk, Brownlow and Mazzariol2019; Life DELFI, 2020, accessed online 31 August 2023).
These findings, both external and internal, were consistent with fatal inter-specific aggressive behaviours by bottlenose dolphins, with no obvious concurrence of synergistic agents, representing, to the authors' knowledge, the first case reported in literature within Italian waters, specifically the Ligurian Sea.
Similar aggressive behaviours of bottlenose dolphins towards other cetacean species have been previously reported in other regions, particularly in the UK (Ross and Wilson, Reference Ross and Wilson1996; Jepson and Baker, Reference Jepson and Baker1998), the Western US waters (Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012) and Northwestern Spain (Methion and Díaz López, Reference Methion and Díaz López2021). In the Mediterranean Sea, attacks directed on striped dolphins were reported by necropsies in Spain and France (Dhermain, Reference Dhermain2020; Crespo-Picazo et al., Reference Crespo-Picazo, Rubio-Guerri, Jiménez, Aznar, Marco-Cabedo, Melero, Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Gozalbes and García-Párraga2021; Gannier, Reference Gannier2021).
In the Ligurian Sea, striped dolphins and bottlenose dolphins are regularly present all year round (Azzellino et al., Reference Azzellino, Gaspari, Airoldi and Nani2008; Notarbartolo-Di-Sciara et al., Reference Notarbartolo-Di-Sciara, Agardy, Hyrenbach, Scovazzi and Van Klaveren2008). Moreover, in the western part of the Ligurian Sea, where the necropsied animal was found stranded, a recent increase in the presence of bottlenose dolphins was observed (Ascheri et al., Reference Ascheri, Fontanesi, Ballardini, Nani and Alessi2022). Usually, the two species are found in different habitats in relation to their depths: striped dolphins show a habitat distribution range that includes the continental slope and the pelagic area (Gannier, Reference Gannier2005; Moulins et al., Reference Moulins, Rosso, Ballardini and Würtz2008; Panigada et al., Reference Panigada, Zanardelli, MacKenzie, Donovan, Mélin and Hammond2008), while bottlenose dolphins are mostly found in coastal waters on the continental platform (Bearzi et al., Reference Bearzi, Fortuna and Reeves2009; Gnone et al., Reference Gnone, Bellingeri, Dhermain, Dupraz, Nuti, Bedocchi, Moulins, Rosso, Alessi, McCrea, Azzellino, Airoldi, Portunato, Laran, David, Di Meglio, Bonelli, Montesi, Trucchi, Fossa and Wurtz2011). Nevertheless, striped dolphins can also be found on the continental platform or in the deep-water canyons close to the shore to feed on neritic preys (Aznar et al., Reference Aznar, Míguez-Lozano, Ruiz, Bosch de Castro, Raga and Blanco2017). The Ligurian Sea, and more importantly its Western part, presents a particular geomorphology, with a very restricted and narrow continental platform crossed by several submarine canyons (Migeon et al., Reference Migeon, Cattaneo, Hassoun, Larroque, Corradi, Fanucci, Dano, de Lepinay, Sage and Gorini2011), allowing for the two species' ranges to occasionally overlap.
Both in Spain (Crespo-Picazo et al., Reference Crespo-Picazo, Rubio-Guerri, Jiménez, Aznar, Marco-Cabedo, Melero, Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Gozalbes and García-Párraga2021) and France (Dhermain, Reference Dhermain2020; Gannier, Reference Gannier2021), it has been noted that strandings of striped dolphins with injuries referable to bottlenose dolphins' aggressions were mostly located in areas with a very narrow continental platform, similar to the area of this case study, rather than in areas with a larger continental platform, presenting scarcer possibilities of encounter between the two species. The partial overlap in habitats could, in fact, result in territory defence behaviours by bottlenose dolphins and/or the competition for available resources between sympatric species as reported in other cases worldwide (Cotter et al., Reference Cotter, Maldini and Jefferson2012; Methion and Díaz López, Reference Methion and Díaz López2021).
These episodes are scarcely observed in the wild and rarely evidenced on carcasses during necropsies (e.g. in the Canary Islands 24 out of 540 stranded cetaceans examined in 17 years showed intra-interspecific traumatic lesions (Puig-Lozano et al., Reference Puig-Lozano, Fernández, Saavedra, Tejedor, Sierra, De La Fuente, Xuriach, Diaz-Delgado, Rivero, Andrada, Bernaldo De Quiros and Arbelo2020); in Valencian Community shoreline, Spain 16 cases out of 136 examined in 11 years (Crespo-Picazo et al., Reference Crespo-Picazo, Rubio-Guerri, Jiménez, Aznar, Marco-Cabedo, Melero, Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Gozalbes and García-Párraga2021); in Italy 1 case (the one here reported), out of 394 cetaceans necropsied in 6 years (C.Re.Di.Ma, accessed online 17 December 2022)). As evidenced by Puig-Lozano et al. (Reference Puig-Lozano, Fernández, Saavedra, Tejedor, Sierra, De La Fuente, Xuriach, Diaz-Delgado, Rivero, Andrada, Bernaldo De Quiros and Arbelo2020), detailed pathological studies regarding aggressive encounters are lacking, making these reporting even more relevant to create a conventional intra-interspecific interaction diagnosis different from other possible traumatic causes.
The reported case is therefore of great interest as it highlights the existence of these interspecific aggressive interactions in an area where they have not been described before, allowing the tracking of a very peculiar phenomenon and its potential recurrence across time. Consequently, our results expand the known geographic range of interspecific attacks by bottlenose dolphins in the western Mediterranean Sea.
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Department of Prevention, Local Veterinary Services (ASL 1 Imperiese) for their assistance. A big thanks to Caroline O'Connor and Katerina Conrad for the constructive comments to enhance the article.
Author contributions
D. A., E. F. and C. G. coordinated the paper and were responsible of writing the original draft. D. A., C. G., E. d. F. and E. B. participated in the necropsy. L. M. performed the toxicological analysis, A. D. performed the bacteriological analysis, M. G. and L. S. performed the biomolecular analysis, C. F. performed the serological analysis, K. V. performed the histopathological analysis, F. G. performed the neuropathological analysis and F. Ga. analysed the stomach contents, C. G., F. G. and C. C. were responsible of the review and editing. All the authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Financial support
This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2019 IZS PLV 05/19).
Competing interest
None.
Ethical standards
Not applicable