Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:23:51.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rays and Skates (Raiœ) No. 1.—Egg-Capsules and Young

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Robert S. Clark
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory.

Extract

The family Raiidæ belongs to the division Batoidei of the sub-order Hypotremata, and is represented by the principal genera Raia, Psammobatis, and Sympterygia (Regan, 1906). The genus Raia (an altered spelling of Raja) was instituted by Linnæus, after Artedi, for the type Raja batis in the Systema Naturæ, Ed. X, Vol. I, 1758. The species are numerous and mostly of northern distribution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1892. Alcock, A.Some Observations on the embryonic history of Pteroplatæa micrura. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6th Series, No. 55, July, 1892.Google Scholar
1892. Alcock, A.On utero gestation in Trygon Bleekeri. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6th Series, No. 54, June, 1892.Google Scholar
1878. Balfour, F. M.A Monograph on the Development of Elasmo branch Fishes. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1890. Beard, J. On the Development of the common Skate (R. batis). 8th Report Scott. Fish. Board. 1889–90.Google Scholar
(Reference also to purses of R. circularis (=naevus), radiata, clavata, maculata.)Google Scholar
1909. Bianco, Salv., Lo. Notizie biologiche riguardanté specialmente il periodo di maturita sessuale degli animali del golfo di Napoli. Mitth. Stat. Neapel. XIX.Google Scholar
1841. Bonaparte, Principe, Carlo L.. Iconografia della Fauna Italica, Tomo III, Pesci. Roma.Google Scholar
1906. Borcea, I. Observations sur quelques Raies de la baie de Naples. Ann. Scientifiques de l'Université de Jassy. Tome IV.Google Scholar
1906. Borcea, I. Apercu de la Faune des Elasmobranches à Roscoff. Arch. Zool. Exp. et Gén., 4th Series. Tome IV., No. 5.Google Scholar
1910. Bridge, T. W. and Boulenger, G. A.Fishes and Ascidians. Cambridge Natural History. London.Google Scholar
1894. Bugnion, E.Le developpement des Selaciens (Acanthias vulgaris et Scyllium canicula) et des Raies (Raia alba, R. clavata). Bull. Soc. Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles. Procés Verbaux, pp. XXXIXXXIV, 3e Series, Vol. XXX, No. 115.Google Scholar
1838. Couch, Jon. Description of a species of Ray fish not hitherto included in the British Fauna (R. circularis).Google Scholar
1913. Danois, E. Le Contribution à l'étude systématique et biologique des Poissons de la Manche occidentale. Ann. Instit. Océano. Tome V, fasc. 5.Google Scholar
1895. Dean, , Bashford, . Fishes Living and Fossil. Columbia University Biological Series III.Google Scholar
1902. Dean, , Bashford, . Chimæroid fishes and their development. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, No. 32.Google Scholar
1904. Dean, , Bashford, . Evolution in a Determinate Line as illustrated by the egg cases of Chimæroid fishes. Biol. Bull. Marine Biol. Lab., Woods Holl., VII.Google Scholar
1809. Delaroche, M. Sur des Poissons recueillis dans un voyage aux iles Baléares et Pythiuses. Descriptions des espèces nouvelles ou peu connues. Ann. Mus. d'Hist. Nat., XIII. (R. radula, R. asterias.)Google Scholar
1808. Donovan, E.The Natural History of British Fishes, Vol. V. London.(R. radiata.)Google Scholar
1865. Dumeril, A. Hist. Naturelle des Poissons ou Ichthyologie gènérale. Tome première. Paris.Google Scholar
1839. Fries, B. Granskning af de vid Svenska kuster no förekommande arter af fiskslägtet raja. Kongl. Vet. Akad. Handl., 1838.Google Scholar
1913. Garman, S.The Plagiostomia. Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, Vol. XXXVI.Google Scholar
1909. Goodrich, E. S.A Treatise on Zoology (edited by Sir Ray, Lankester). Part IX. Vertebrata Craniata.Google Scholar
1870. Günther, A.British Museum Catalogue of Fishes, Vol. VIII.Google Scholar
1904. Hoek, P. P. C. Catalogue des Poissons du Nord de l'Europe avec les noms vulgaires. Publications de Circonstance, No. 12.Google Scholar
1893. Holt, E. W. L.North Sea Investigations. The Blonde (R. blanda), a species hitherto confounded with R. maculata Mont. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. III. N.S. 1893–5.Google Scholar
1897. Holt, E. W. L.The Bottlenose Ray (? R. alba Lacep.) and its egg purse. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. V. N.S. 1897–9.Google Scholar
1908. Holt, E. W. L. and Byrne, L. W.Second Report on the Fishes of the Irish Atlantic Slope. Fisheries Ireland Sci. Invest. 1906. V.Google Scholar
1895. Holt, E. W. L. and Calderwood, W. L.Report on the rarer fishes. Survey of fishing grounds West Coast of Ireland. Trans. Roy. Soc. Dublin, Vol. V (Series II), No. IX.Google Scholar
1908. Hussakof, L. and Welker, W. H.Notes on the chemical nature of Egg Cases of two Species of Sharks. Journal Biol. Chem., IV. 1908. XLIV-XLV.Google Scholar
1914. Jensen, A. S. The Selachians of Greenland. Mindeskrift for Japetus Steenstrup. XXX. Kobenhavn. (R. ingolfiana Lütken=R. lintea Fries.)Google Scholar
1896. Jordan, D. S. and Evermann, B. W.The fishes of North and Middle America. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 47, Part I.Google Scholar
1910. Kemp, S.The Decapoda natantia of the coasts of Ireland. Fisheries Ireland Sci. Invest. 1908. I. (1910).Google Scholar
1919. Graham, Kerr J.. Text Book of Embryology, Vol. II. Vertebrata. London.Google Scholar
1908. Klinksieck, et Valette, . Code des Couleurs. Paris.Google Scholar
17981803. Lacépède, B. G.Histoire Naturelle des Poissons. Paris.Google Scholar
1873. Lafont, M. A.Description d'une Nouvelle espèce de Raie. Actes Soc. Linn. Bord. XXVIII. (R. brachyura.)Google Scholar
1898. Lütken, C.The Ichthyological Results of the Expedition of the Ingolf. Fishes, Vol. II, No. 1. (R. fyllæ).Google Scholar
1876. Malm, A. W.Embryonic development of Raia clavata. Kongl. Vet. Akad. Forh., No. 3. 1876.Google Scholar
1877. Malm, A. W.Göteborgs och Bohusläns fauna. Göteborg.Google Scholar
1815. Montagu, G.An account of several new and rare species of Fishes, taken on the South Coast of Devonshire. Mem. Wernerian Nat. Hist. Soc., Vol. II. 1811–16. (R. maculata, R. microcellata.)Google Scholar
1841. Müller, J., und Henle, J.Systematische Beschreibung der Plagiostomen. Berlin. (R. nævus.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1881. Moreau, R.Poissons de la France, Vol. I. Paris.Google Scholar
1917. Nordgaard, O. Contributions to the Life History of the Fishes in Trondhjem Fjord and environs. Det. Kgl. Norske Vidensk. Selskab. Skrifter. 1915. 2nd hefte, Nr. 9.Google Scholar
1866. Owen, R. On the Anatomy of Vertebrates. Fishes and Reptiles. T. i. London.Google Scholar
1914. Peyrega, E. Sur la perméabilité osmotique de la coque des œufs de Sélaciens. Bull. de la Société Zool. de France. Tome XXXIX.Google Scholar
1906. Regan, C. Tate. A Classification of the Selachian Fishes. Proc. Zool. Soc., London. 1906. II.Google Scholar
1920. Schmidt, Johs.Racial investigations. IV. The Genetic Behaviour of a Secondary Sexual Character. Comptes Rendus du Laboratoire Carisberg, Vol. 14. No. 8.Google Scholar
1919. Southwell, T., and Prashad, B.Embroyological and Developmental Studies of Indian Fishes. Records Indian Museum, Vol. XVI, Part III, No. 14.Google Scholar
1885. Vaillant, L. Remarques sur l'orientation des œufs dans l'uterus chez les poissons. Elasmobranches ovipares. Bull. Soc. Philomath, Paris. 1884. 7. Series 8.Google Scholar
1913. Williamson, H. C.On the eggs of certain Skates (Raia). Fisheries, Scotland, Sci. Invest. 1912. I.x (July, 1913.)Google Scholar
1918. Wintrebert, P. Les mouvements et la sensibilité embryonnaires des Selaciens (Scyllium canicula). Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, XLIII–XLIV.Google Scholar
1891. Wood Mason, Prof. J., and Alcock, A. On the uterine villiform papillæ of Pteroplatæa micrura and their relation to the embryo. Proc. Roy. Soc., London. Vol. XLIX.Google Scholar
1867. Wyman, J.Observations on the development of Raia batis. Mem. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sciences. New Series, Vol. IX, Part I, No. 2.Google Scholar