Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:46:31.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between shallow-water cumacean assemblages and sediment characteristics facing the Iranian coast of the Persian Gulf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Daniel Martin ,
Ulla Fernadez-Arcaya ,
Paula Tirado ,
Éric Dutrieux  and
Jordi Corbera
Daniel Martin*
Affiliation:
Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC), Carrer d'Accés a la Cala Sant Francesc, 14, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Catalunya (Spain)
Ulla Fernadez-Arcaya
Affiliation:
Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC), Carrer d'Accés a la Cala Sant Francesc, 14, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Catalunya (Spain)
Paula Tirado
Affiliation:
Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC), Carrer d'Accés a la Cala Sant Francesc, 14, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Catalunya (Spain)
Éric Dutrieux
Affiliation:
CRÉOCÉAN, 39 rue Jean Giroux, Parc Euromédecine II, 34080 Montpellier, France
Jordi Corbera
Affiliation:
Carrer Gran, 90, 08310 Argentona, Catalunya, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Martin, Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC), Carrer d'Accés a la Cala Sant Francesc, 14, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Catalunya (Spain) email: dani@ceab.csic.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During two sampling campaigns carried out in August 1998 and November 2002, 232 cumaeans from eight species belonging to the families Bodotriidae and Nannastacidae were collected. This paper presents the first ecological data on a shallow water tropical cumacean assemblage from the Persian Gulf, where 50% of the existing species were recently described as new for the science. Neither the environmental conditions (except for the sediment organic content) nor the cumacean assemblage descriptors differed between the two sampling periods. However, two different species dominated in each period (i.e. Eocuma travancoricum and Heterocuma inerme in 1998 and 2002, respectively) and the MDS analysis revealed differences in the assemblage composition between periods, particularly for the deepest sampling stations. An increasing density together with the increase in gravel content, and a decreasing density together with the increasing silt content characterized the distribution pattern of both the whole cumacean assemblages and the two dominant species, the latter being also positively correlated with the mean grain size and negatively correlated with depth and organic matter (E. travancoricum) and with depth (H. inerme).

Keywords

Tropicalshallow waterscumacean assemblagessediment characteristicsPersian Gulf
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 125 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alfonso, M.I., Bandera, M.E., López-González, P.J. and García-Gómez, J.C. (1998) The cumacean community associated with a seaweed as a bioindicator of environmental conditions in the Algeciras Bay (Strait of Gibraltar). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 39, 197–205.Google Scholar
Anger, K. and Valentin, C. (1976) In situ studies on the diurnal activity pattern of Diastylis rathkei (Cumacea, Crustacea) and its importance for the ‘hyperbenthos’. Helgoländer Wissenschaften Meeresunters Ungers 28, 138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacescu, M. and Muradian, Z. (1975) New Cumacea from the Red Sea. Travaux du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle ‘Grigore Antipa’ 16, 35–69.Google Scholar
Barnard, J.L. and Given, R.R. (1960) Morphology and ecology of some sublittoral cumacean Crustacea of southern California. Pacific Naturalist 2, 153–165.Google Scholar
Blazewicz-Paskowycz, M. and Ligowski, R. (2002) Diatoms as food source indicators for some Antarctic Cumacea and Tanaidacea (Crustacea). Antarctic Science 14, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J.E. (1993) Diets of two deep-sea decapods: Nematocarcinus exilis (Caridea: Namatocarcinidae) and Munida tenuimana (Anomura: Galatheidae) on the Western Mediterranean slope. Ophelia 37, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J.E., Jaume, D. and Madurell, T. (2003) Local changes in the composition and community structure of suprabenthic peracarid crustaceans on the bathyal Mediterranean: influence of environmental factors. Marine Biology 143, 745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. (2006) PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial (Plymouth routines in multivariate ecological research). Plymouth: Primer-E Ltd.Google Scholar
Connolly, R.M. (1997) Differences in composition of small, motile invertebrate assemblages from seagrass and unvegetated habitats in a southern Australian estuary. Hydrobiologia 346, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbera, J., Brito, M.C. and Núñez, J. (2002) Interstitial cumaceans from sandy bottoms and Cymodocea meadows of the Canary Islands. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 43, 63–71.Google Scholar
Corbera, J. and Cardell, M.J. (1995) Cumaceans as indicators of eutrophication on soft bottoms. Scientia Marina, 59 (Suppl. 1), 63–69.Google Scholar
Corbera, J., San Vicente, C. and Sorbe, J.C. (2000) Small-scale distribution, life cycle and secondary production of Cumopsis goodsir in Creixell Beach (western Mediterranean). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbera, J., Tirado, P. and Martin, D. (2005) Cumaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) from the Persian Gulf. Zootaxa 1087, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, S. (1970) The quantitative distribution of three Cumacea (Crustacea, Peracarida) in Kames Bay, Scotland. Canadian Journal of Zoology 48, 925–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dos Santos, M.L.F. and Pires-Vanin, A.M.S. (1999) The Cumacea community of the south-eastern Brazilian Continental Shelf: structure and dynamics. Scientia Marina 63, 15–25.Google Scholar
Foxon, G.E.H. (1936) Notes on the natural history of certain sand-dweling Cumacea. Annals and Magazine of Natural History Series 10,17, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladfelter, W.B. (1975) Quantitative distribution of shallow-water Cumacea from the vicinity of Dillon Beach, California, with descriptions of five new species. Crustaceana 29, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, H.M. (1943) Notes on two sand-dwelling Cumacea (Gephryrocuma and Picrocuma). Records of the South Australian Museum 7, 337–342.Google Scholar
Jones, N.S. and Sanders, H.L. (1972) Distribution of Cumacea in the deep Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research 19, 737–745.Google Scholar
Kurian, C.V. (1951) The Cumacea of Travancore. Bulletin of the Research Institute of the University of Travancore Series C, 2, 77–118.Google Scholar
Kurian, C.V. (1954) Notes on Cumacea (Sympoda) in the Zoological Survey of India. Records of the Indian Museum 52, 275–311.Google Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C. (1991) La phase pélagique nocturne des Cumacés. Journal of Plankton Research 13, 313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzola, A.L., Lopiano, L., Rosa, T. and Sara, G. (1999) Diel feeding habits of juveniles of Mullus surmuletus (Linneo, 1758) in the lagoon of the Stagnone di Marsala (Western Sicily, Italy). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 15, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modlin, R.F. (1992) Population structure, distribution, life cycle and reproductive strategy of Spilocuma watlingi Omholt and Heard, 1979 and S. salomani Watling, 1977 (Cumacea: Bodotriidae) from coastal waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Northeast Gulf Science 12, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühlenhardt-Siegel, U. (1996) Cumacea (Crustacea) from the Red Sea and the Maldives (Indian Ocean) in the collection of the Zoological Museum, Hamburg, with the description of seven new species and a new genus. Beaufortia 46, 105–134.Google Scholar
Mühlenhardt-Siegel, U. (2000) Cumacea (Crustacea) from the Seychelles, Sri Lanka (western Indian Ocean), and the Red Sea, with the description of six new species. Beaufortia 50, 197–222.Google Scholar
Olaso, I., Rauschert, M. and De Broyer, C. (2000) Trophic ecology of the family Artedidraconidae (Pisces: Osteichthyes) and its impact on the eastern Weddell Sea benthic system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 194, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, A.R.G., Sheppard, C.R.C. and Roberts, C.M. (1993) The Persian Gulf: its biological setting. Marine Pollution Bulletin 27, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhadevi, A. and Kurian, C.V. (1989) A collection of Cumacea from the south west and south east coasts of India. Zoological Survey of India 121, 1–37.Google Scholar
Rehm, P., Thatje, S., Mühlenthardt-Siegel, U. and Brandt, A. (2007) Composition and distribution of the peracarid crustacean fauna along a latitudinal transect off Victoria Land (Ross Sea, Antarctica) with special emphasis on the Cumacea. Polar Biology 30, 871–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, R.M. (1993) Physical oceanography of the Persian Gulf, Strait of Ormuz and Gulf of Oman—results from the Mt Mitchel Expedition. Marine Pollution Bulletin 27, 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scipione, M.M.B., Lattanzi, L., Tomassetti, P., Gusso Chimenz, C., Maggiori, F., Marinello, L., Cironi, R. and Taramelli, E. (2005) Biodiversity and zonation patterns of crustacean peracarids and decapods of coastal soft-bottom assemblages (Central Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Vie et Milieu 55, 143–161.Google Scholar
Sheppard, C.R.C. (1993) Physical environment of the Gulf relevant to marine pollution: an overview. Marine Pollution Bulletin 27, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, T.F., Shepherd, C.F. and Elner, R.W. (2000) Predation on meiofaunal and macrofaunal invertebrates by western sandpipers (Calidris mauri): evidence for dual foraging modes. Marine Biology 137, 983–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, J.A. (1989) Seasonal abundance of Coricuma nicoyensis Watling and Breedy, 1988 (Crustacea, Cumacea) on a tropical intertidial mud flat. Revista de Biología Tropical 37, 207–211.Google Scholar
Wieser, W. (1956) Factors influencing the choice of substratum in Cumella vulgaris Hart (Crustacea, Cumacea). Limnology and Oceanography 1, 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieser, W. (1959) The effect of grain size on the distribution of small invertebrates inhabiting the beaches of Puget Sound. Limnology and Oceanography 4, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1984) Biostatistical analyses. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Zimmer, C. (1933) Beobachtunge an lebeden Mysidaceen und Cumaceen. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde 18, 326–347.Google Scholar