Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:48:34.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks on the Presumed Example of Hybridization Between Two Species of Pagurus [Crustacea: Decapoda: Paguridae]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Patsy A. McLaughlin
Patsy A. McLaughlin
Affiliation:
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A critical evaluation of the characters utilized in support of a report of hybridization between two sympatric European species of Pagurus is presented. These characters are contrasted with characters considered to be diagnostic for the species. Although, on the basis of present evidence, the possibility of hybridization is not wholly excluded, it is shown to be highly improbable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , August 1973 , pp. 563 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bookhout, C. G., 1972. Larval development of the hermit crab, Pagurus alatus Fabricius, reared in the laboratory (Decapoda, Paguridae). Crustaceana, 22, 215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, E. L., 1940. Décapodes marcheurs. Section II, Anomura. Faune de France, 37, 110–79.Google Scholar
Dechancé, M., 1961. Sur la morphologie externe des larves de pagurides. I. Catapaguroides timidus (Roux). Crustaceana, 2, 53–67.Google Scholar
Dechancé, M. & Forest, J., 1958. Les glaucothoés de Catapaguroides timidus (Roux) et de Clibanarius erythropus (Latreille). Remarques surle stade post-larvaire des pagurides. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 33, 274–93.Google Scholar
Forest, J. & De Saint Laurent, M., 1967. Campagne de la ‘Calypso’ au large des côtes atlantiques de l'Amérique du sud (1961–1962). 6. Crustacés Décapodes: Pagurides. Annales de I'Institut oceanographique, 45 (2), 47–169.Google Scholar
Hazlett, B. A., 1966. The behavior of some deep-water hermit crabs (Decapoda: Paguridea) from the Straits of Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science, 16, 76–92.Google Scholar
Jennings, K. N., 1972. An example of hybridization between Pagurus bernhardus and Pagurus pubescens [Crustacea: Anomura]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 1057–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, J. D., Pike, R. B. & Williamson, D. I., 1957. Larvae of the British species of Diogenes, Pagurus, Anapagurus and Lithodes (Crustacea, Decapoda). Proceedings of the Zoo-logical Society of London, 128, 209–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclaughlin, P. A., The hermit crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Paguridea) of northwestern North America. Zoologische verhandlingen. Leiden (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Pike, R. B. & Williamson, D. I., 1960. Larvae of decapod Crustacea of the families Diogenidae and Paguridae from the Bay of Naples. Pubblicazioni della Stazione zoologica di Napoli, 31, 493–552.Google Scholar
Provenzano, A. J. Jr., 1968. Lithopagurus yucatanicus, a new genus and species of hermit crab with a distinctive larva. Bulletin of Marine Science, 18, 627–44.Google Scholar
Provenzano, A. J. Jr. & Rice, A. L., 1964. The larval stages oiPagurus marshi Benedict (Decapoda, Anomura) reared in the laboratory. Crustaceana, 7, 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenzano, A. J. Jr. & Rice, A. L., 1966. Juvenile morphology and the development of taxonomic characters in Paguristes sericeus A. Milne-Edwards (Decapoda, Diogenidae). Crustaceana, 10, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, H. J., 1964. Pagurus pubescens and a proposed new name for a closely related species in the northwest Atlantic (Decapoda: Anomura). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 21, 355–65.Google Scholar