Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:17:53.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scale-dependent patterns of variability in species assemblages of the rocky intertidal at Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2008

Katharina Reichert ,
Friedrich Buchholz ,
Inka Bartsch ,
Thomas Kersten  and
Luis Giménez
Katharina Reichert*
Affiliation:
Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Foundation Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, 27498 Helgoland, Germany
Friedrich Buchholz
Affiliation:
Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Foundation Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, 27498 Helgoland, Germany
Inka Bartsch
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
Thomas Kersten
Affiliation:
HafenCity University Hamburg, Department of Geomatics, 22297 Hamburg, Germany
Luis Giménez
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, LL59 5AB Menai Bridge, Wales, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Katharina Reichert, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Foundation Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, 27498 Helgoland, Germany email: Katharina.Reichert@awi.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A growing body of literature shows that benthic communities are hierarchically structured on spatial and temporal scales. In two study locations at Helgoland (North Sea), the northern and the western locations, we: (1) investigated the variation in abundance of specific algae and invertebrates at two spatial scales; and (2) evaluated the relationship between elevation and specific species at these scales. We were also interested in using this information about the spatial pattern of individual algae and invertebrates as well as the patterns of elevation to help develop a monitoring programme of the rocky intertidal. We examined the variation of individual algae and invertebrates by means of a hierarchical nested design. Data were taken from five replicates per plot, with plots located in transects (two transects per location).

At the northern location, the highest variability in cover of most algae and invertebrates occurred at the scale separated by about 50 m (scale: transect). This was a direct result of differences between the high- and the low-shore. Most species at high-shore showed a relatively low frequency of occurrence in contrast to a highest frequency of occurence (~100%) and maximal values of cover at low-shore. However, neither a linear nor a non-linear relationship between elevation and the specific species occurred. At the western location, the highest variability in most macroalgae and invertebrates investigated was among replicates (10s of centimetres apart). No relationship between elevation and individual species occurred at this location. Macroalgae at both locations were more consistent over time than invertebrate species. Our results suggest that the relevant processes shaping the individual macroalgae and invertebrates at the Helgoland rocky intertidal vary between locations and the specific species.

The potential causes of variation in macroalgal and invertebrate species at different spatial scales are discussed and suggestions for a future monitoring programme are given. Temporal inconsistency in the spatial patterns, and the fact that some individual algae and invertebrates comprising the benthic assemblages vary at different scales, speak in favour of a multiple-scale sampling approach for monitoring change in the intertidal communities at Helgoland.

Keywords

spatial scalesvariabilityalgaeinvertebratesspecies-abundance classeselevationrocky intertidalHelgolandNorth Sea
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 7 , November 2008 , pp. 1319 - 1329
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aberg, P. and Pavia, H. (1997) Temporal and multiple scale spatial variation in juvenile and adult abundance of the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum. Marine Ecology Progress Series 158, 111–119.Google Scholar
Andrews, M.J. and Richard, D. (1980) Rehabilitation of the inner Thames Estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 11, 327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archambault, P. and Bourget, E. (1996) Scales of coastal heterogeneity and benthic intertidal species richness, diversity and abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 136, 111–121.Google Scholar
Bartsch, I. and Tittley, I. (2004) The rocky intertidal biotopes of Helgoland: present and past. Helgoland Marine Research 58, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G., Lechowicz, M.J., Appenzeller, A., Chandler, M., DeBlois, E., Jackson, L., Mackenzie, B., Preziosi, R., Schallenberg, M. and Tinker, N. (1993) The spatial structure of the physical environment. Oecologia 96, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedetti-Cecchi, L. (2000) Predicting direct and indirect interactions during succession in a midlittoral rocky shore assemblage. Ecological Monographs 70, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedetti-Cecchi, L. (2001) Variability in abundance of algae and invertebrates at different spatial scales on rocky sea shores. Marine Ecology Progress Series 215, 79–92.Google Scholar
Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Bulleri, F. and Cinelli, F. (2000a) The interplay of physical and biological factors in maintaining mid-shore and low-shore assemblages on rocky coasts in the north-west Mediterranean. Oecologia 123, 406–417.Google Scholar
Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Acunto, S., Bulleri, F. and Cinelli, F. (2000b) Population ecology of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus in the northwest Mediterranean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 198, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.G. (2002) Patterns of spatial and temporal variation of macrofauna under boulders in a sheltered boulder field. Austral Ecology 27, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.G. and Underwood, A.J. (1994) Dispersal of the intertidal snail, Nodilittorina pyramidalis, in response to the topographic complexity of the substratum. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 179, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.G., Underwood, A.J. and Skilleter, G.A. (1995) Variability at different spatial scales between a subtidal assemblage exposed to the discharge of sewage and two control assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 189, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.G. and Underwood, A.J. (1998) Inconsistency and variation in the development of rocky intertidal algal assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 224, 265–289.Google Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1961) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthalamus stellatus. Ecology 42, 710–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chryssovergis, F. and Panayotidis, P. (1995) Communities of macrophytobenthos along an eutrophication gradient (Maliakos Gulf, Aegean Sea, Greece). Oceanologica Acta 18, 649–658.Google Scholar
Dayton, P.K. (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 41, 351–389.Google Scholar
De Kluijver, M.J. (1991) Sublittoral hard substrate communities off Helgoland. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 45, 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Kluijver, M.J. (1993) Sublittoral hard-substratum communities off Orkney and St Abbs (Scotland). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 73, 733–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, D.J. and Underwood, A.J. (2002) How to cope with negative estimates of components of variance in ecological field studies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 273, 89–95.Google Scholar
Fraschetti, S., Terlizzi, A. and Benedetti-Cecchi, L. (2005) Patterns of distribution of marine assemblages from rocky shores: evidence of relevant scales of variation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 296, 13–29.Google Scholar
Gray, J.S. (1981) The ecology of marine sediments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J.S. and Mirza, F.B. (1979) A possible method for detecting pollution indicated disturbance on marine benthic communities. Marine Pollution Bulletin 10, 142–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J.S. and Pearson, T.H. (1982) Objective selection of sensitive species indicative of pollution-induced change in benthic communities. I. Comparative methodology. Marine Ecology Progress Series 9, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guichard, F. and Bourget, E. (1998) Topographic heterogeneity, hydrodynamics, and benthic community structure: a scale-dependent cascade. Marine Ecology Progress Series 171, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, B., Haug, T. and Sandnes, O.K. (1980) Benthic macrofauna on new and old grounds at Jan Mayen. Sarsia 65, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, J. (1993) Check list of species (algae, invertebrates and vertebrates) found in the vicinity of the island of Helgoland (North Sea, German Bight)—a review of recent records. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 47, 1–34.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G. and Hawkins, S.J. (1980) Monitoring rocky-shore communities: a critical look at spatial and temporal variation. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 33, 484–494.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. and Hartnoll, R.G. (1985) Factors determining the upper limits of intertidal canopy-forming algae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 20, 265–271.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. and Hartnoll, R.G. (1983) Grazing of intertidal algae by marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology 21, 195–282.Google Scholar
Hyder, K., Johnson, M.P., Hawkins, S.J. and Gurney, W.S.C. (1998) Barnacle demography: evidence for an existing model and spatial scales of variation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 174, 89–99.Google Scholar
Janke, K. (1986) Die Makrofauna und ihre Verteilung im Nordost-Felswatt von Helgoland. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 40, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S.R., Hawkins, S.J. and Norton, T.A. (1999a) Interaction between a fucoid canopy and limpet grazing in structuring a low shore intertidal community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 233, 41–63.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S.R., Hawkins, S.J. and Norton, T.A. (1999b) Direct and indirect effects of a macroalgal canopy and limpet grazing in structuring a sheltered inter-tidal community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 188, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S.R., Aeberg, P., Cervin, G., Coleman, R.A., Delany, J., Della Santina, P., Hawkins, S.J., LaCroix, E., Myers, A.A., Lindegarth, M., Power, A.M., Roberts, M.F. and Hartnoll, R.G. (2000) Spatial and temporal variation in settlement and recruitment of the intertidal barnacle Semibalanus balanoides (L.) (Crustacea: Cirripedia) over a European scale. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 243, 209–225.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S.R., Arenas, F., Arrontes, J., Bussell, J., Castro, J., Coleman, R.A., Hawkins, S.J., Kay, S., Martinez, B., Oliveros, J., Roberts, M.F., Sousa, S., Thompson, R.C. and Hartnoll, R.G. (2001) European-scale analysis of seasonal variability in limpet grazing activity and microalgal abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 211, 193–203.Google Scholar
Kaandorp, J.A. (1986) Rocky substrate communities of the infralittoral fringe of the Boulonnais coast, NW France: a quantitative survey. Marine Biology 92, 255–265.Google Scholar
Kelaher, B.P., Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (2003) Experimental transplantations of coralline algal turf to demonstrate causes of differences in macrofauna at different tidal heights. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 282, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersten, T. and O'Sullivan, W. (1996) Project SWISSPHOTO—digital orthophotos for the entire area of Switzerland. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote SensingVienna12–18 July 1996. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp. 186–191.Google Scholar
Lehmann, V. (2006) Empirische Genauigkeitsuntersuchungen digitaler Geländemodelle verschiedener Sensoren auf Helgoland. Diploma thesis, Department of Geomatics, HafenCity University Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Leonard, G.H., Levine, J.M., Schmidt, P.R. and Bertness, M.D. (1998) Flow driven variation in intertidal community structure in a Maine estuary. Ecology 79, 1395–1411.Google Scholar
Lewis, J.R. (1978) The ecology of rocky shores. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Li, J., Vincx, M., Herman, P.M.J. and Heip, C. (1997) Monitoring meiobenthos using cm-, m- and km-scales in the Southern Bight of the North Sea. Marine Environmetal Research 43, 265–278.Google Scholar
Lubchenco, J. and Menge, B.A. (1978) Community development and persistance in a low rocky intertidal zone. Ecological Monographs 48, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüning, K. (1985) Meeresbotanik. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.Google Scholar
Menconi, M., Benedetti-Cecchi, L. and Cinelli, F. (1999) Spatial and temporal variability in the distribution of algae and invertebrates on rocky shores in the Northwest Mediterranean. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 233, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrisey, D.J., Howitt, L., Underwood, A.J. and Stark, J.S. (1992) Spatial variation in soft-sediment benthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series 81, 197–204.Google Scholar
Newell, R.C. (1979) Biology of intertidal animals. Faversham: Marine Ecological Survey Ltd.Google Scholar
Norton, T.A. (1985) The zonation of seaweeds on rocky shores. In Moore, P.G. and Seed, R. (eds) The ecology of rocky coasts. London: Hodder & Stoughton, pp. 7–21.Google Scholar
Paine, R.T. (1974) Intertidal community structure. Experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichert, K. and Buchholz, F. (2006) Changes in the macrozoobenthos of the intertidal zone at Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea): a survey of 1984 repeated in 2002. Helgoland Marine Research 60, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D.L. (1987) Estimation and use of variance components. The Statistician 36, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, S.R. (1987) Linear models for unbalanced data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Searle, S.R., Casella, G. and McCulloch, C.E. (1992) Variance components. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, S.R. (1995) An overview of variance component estimation. Metrika 42, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J.D. (1998) Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24, 323–355.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry: the principles and practise of statistics in biological research, 3rd edition. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Southward, A.J. (1958) The zonation of plants and animals on rocky sea shores. Biological Reviews 33, 137–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, T.A. and Stephenson, A. (1949) The universal features of zonation between tidemarks on rocky coasts. Journal of Ecology 37, 289–305.Google Scholar
Stephenson, T.A. and Stephenson, A. (1972) Life between tidemarks on rocky shores. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Swenson, N.G., Enquist, B.J., Jason, P., Thompson, J. and Zimmermann, J.K. (2006) The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. Ecology 87, 2418–2424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terlizzi, A., Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Bevilacqua, S., Fraschetti, S., Guidetti, P. and Anderson, M.J. (2005) Multivariate and univariate asymmetrical analyses in environmental impact assessment: a case study of Mediterranean subtidal sessile assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 289, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1996) Spatial patterns of variance in density of intertidal populations. In Floyd, R.B., Sheppard, A.W. and De Barro, P.J. (eds) Frontiers of population ecology. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 369–389.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (1989) Experimental analyses of the influences of topography of the substratum on movements and density of an intertidal snail, Littorina unifasciata. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 134, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (1996) Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates. Oecologia 107, 212–224.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (1998) Spatial analyses of intertidal assemblages on sheltered rocky shores. Austral Ecology 23, 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1978) The minimal area problem in invertebrate communities of Mediterranean rocky substrata. Marine Biology 49, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winer, B.J., Brown, D.R. and Michels, K.M. (1991) Statistical principles in experimental designs, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Zhang, B. and Miller, S. (1997) Adaptive automatic terrain extraction. In McKeown, D.M., McGlone, J.C. and Jamet, O. (eds) Proceedings of the Eleventh SPIE International Symposium on AeroSense, Orlando, Florida, 21–23 April 1997. Integrating Photogrammetric Techniques with Scene Analysis and Machine Vision, pp. 27–36.Google Scholar