Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:24:08.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sequence of Photophore Development in Xenodermichthys Copei (Pisces: Alepocephalidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Julian Badcock  and
R. A. Larcombe
Julian Badcock
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Wormley, Surrey
R. A. Larcombe
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Wormley, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the family Alepocephalidae there are ca. 19 valid genera (Markle, personal communication). Whilst luminescence has never been observed, there are four genera, Xenodermichthys, Photostylus, Rouleina and Microphotolepis, which contain species bearing structures that have been interpreted anatomically as photophores (Herring & Morin, 1978). Among these four there is a remarkable diversity of photophore structure. The photophores of Xenodermichthys and Photostylus are similar in having well developed central cores (reddish violet in Xenodermichthys) and reflector layers, yet those of Xenodermichthys are sessile whilst those of Photostylus are borne on stalks (e.g. von Lendenfeld, 1887; Best & Bone, 1976). Not all species of Rouleina have light organs but where they are present they are sessile. Photophore structure of Rouleina has been examined only in R. maderensis Maul and was found there to be rather degenerate in adults (Markle, 1978). The light organs of Microphotolepis multipunctata Sazanov and Parin differ yet again in being scale covered, which contrasts with the naked photophores in the other three genera (Sazanov & Parin, 1977). The abundance and distribution of photophores in adults also varies with genus and species. Thus in Microphotolepis and Xenodermichthys they are extremely numerous and regularly arranged but in Photostylus they are few and less ordered (Günther, 1887; Beebe, 1933; Sazanov & Parin, 1977). In different species of Rouleina photophores may be relatively abundant and regularly arranged or few in number without such regular pattern (Maul, 1948; Uyeno & Kishida, 1977; Markle, 1978).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , May 1980 , pp. 277 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badcock, J., 1977. Aspects of the development and biology of post-larval Valenciennellus tripunctulatus (Esmark) and Bonapartia pedaliota Goode and Bean (Pisces, Stomiatoidei). In A Voyage of Discovery: George Deacon 70th Anniversary Volume (ed. Angel, M.V.), pp. 537–552. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Barham, E. G., 1970. Deep-sea fishes: lethargy and vertical orientation. In Proceedings of an International Symposium on Biological Sound Scattering in the Ocean, Warrenton, Virginia, 1970 (ed. Farquhar, G. B.), pp. 100–118. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Navy.Google Scholar
Beebe, W., 1933. Deep-sea fishes of the Bermuda Oceanographic Expeditions. Family Alepocephalidae. Zoologica, NewYork, 16, 15–91.Google Scholar
Best, A. C. G. & Bone, Q., 1976. On the integument and photophores of the alepocephalid fishes Xenodermichthys and Photostylus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S., Wardle, C. S. & Roberts, B. L., 1971. Aspects of the circulatory physiology and muscle systems of deep-sea fish. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 991–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. M., 1977. Ten dives of the DSRV Alvin in and near the DWD-106 dumpsite, 25 July-3 August, 1975. Introduction, station data, general observations and conclusions. In U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Vol. III. Contaminant Inputs and Chemical Characteristics, Appendix, pp. 595–609. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey, 1977. (NOAA Dumpsite Evaluation Report 77–1.)Google Scholar
Denton, E. J., 1959. The contributions of the orientated photosensitive and other molecules to the absorption of the whole retina. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 150, 78–94.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Marshall, N. B., 1958. The buoyancy of bathypelagic fishes without a gas-filled swimbladder. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 753–767.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Warren, F. J., 1957. The photosensitive pigments in the retinae of deep-sea fish. Journal of the Marine Association of the United Kingdom, 36, 651–662.Google Scholar
Fourmanoir, P., 1970. Notes ichtyologiques (II). Cahiers de l'Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outre-Mer (série Océanographie), 8(3), 35–46.Google Scholar
Golovan, G. A., 1978. Composition and distribution of the ichthyofauna of the continental slope of North-western Africa. Trud ӯ Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 111, 195–258. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Goodyear, R. H., 1969. Records of the alepocephalid fish Photostylus pycnopterus in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Copeia, 1969, 398–400.Google Scholar
Günther, A., 1887. Report on the deep-sea fishes collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. In Report on the Scientific Results of the Exploring Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger (Zoology), 22, 1–268.Google Scholar
Herring, P. J. & Morin, J. G., 1978. Bioluminescence in fishes. In Bioluminescence in Action (ed. Herring, P. J.), pp. 273–329. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holt, E. W. L. & Byrne, L. W., 1908. Second report on the fishes of the Irish Atlantic Slope. Scientific Investigations of the Fisheries Branch. Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction for Ireland for 1906, no. 5, 63 pp.Google Scholar
Kampa, E. M., 1970 a. Underwater daylight and moonlight measurements in the eastern North Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 397–420.Google Scholar
Kampa, E. M., 1970 b. Photoenvironment and sonic scattering. In Proceedings of an International Symposium on Biological Sound Scattering in the Ocean, Warrenton, Virginia, 1970 (ed. Farquhar, G. B.), pp. 51–60. Washington, D.C: Department of the Navy.Google Scholar
Kashkin, N. I., 1975. Finds of Photostylus pycnopterus (Pisces, Alepocephalidae) in the North-eastern Atlantic, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. Journal of Ichthyology, 15, 817–820. [Translated from Voprosӯikhtiologii.]Google Scholar
Kotthaus, A., 1972. Die meso- und bathypelagischen Fische der ‘Meteor'-Rossbreiten-Expedition 1970 (2. and 3. Fahrtabschnitt). ‘Meteor’ Forschungsergebnisse (Reihe D), no. 11, 1–28.Google Scholar
Krefft, G., 1973. Isospondyli (Clupeiformes) - Clupeoidei. Alepocephalidae. In Check-list of the Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and of the Mediterranean, vol. 1 (ed. Hureau, J. C. and Monod, T.), pp. 86–93. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Lendenfeld, R. Von, 1887. Report on the structure of phosphorescent organs of fishes. In Report on the Scientific Results of the Exploring Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger (Zoology), 22, 277–329.Google Scholar
Markle, D. F., 1978. Taxonomy and distribution of Rouleina attrita and Rouleina maderensis (Pisces, Alepocephalidae). Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States, 76, 79–87.Google Scholar
Markle, D. F. & Wenner, C. A., 1979. Evidence of demersal spawning in the mesopelagic zoarcid fish, Melanostigma atlanticum, with comments on demersal spawning in the alepocephalid fish, Xenodermichthys. Copeia, 1979, 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maul, G. E., 1948. Monographia dos peixes do Museu Municipal do Funchal. Ordem Isospondyli. Boletim do Museu municipal do Funchal, no. 3, art. 5, 5–41.Google Scholar
Maurin, C., Bonnet, J-C. & Quero, J-C., 1977. Poissons des côtes nord-ouest africaines (Campagnes de la ‘Thalassa’ 1962, 1968, 1971 et 1973). Clupeiformes, Scopeliformes et Cetominiformes. Revue des travaux. Institut des pêches maritimes, 41, 5–92.Google Scholar
Nafpaktitis, B. G., 1968. Taxonomy and distribution of the lanternfishes, genera Lobianchia and Diaphus, in the North Atlantic. Dana Reports, no. 73, 131 pp.Google Scholar
Nicol, J. A. C., 1958. Observations on luminescence in pelagic animals. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 705–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nybelin, O., 1948. Fishes collected by the ‘Skagerak’ Expedition in the eastern Atlantic 1946. Göteborgs Kungl. ventenskaps- och vitterhetssamhälles handlingar (Sjätte följden) (series B), 5, (16), 1–95.Google Scholar
Parin, N. V., 1978. New records of midwater fishes from off New Guinea and Tonga Islands with descriptions of two new species of Eustomias (Family Melanostomiatidae) and Benthodesmus (Family Trichiuridae). Trudӯ Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 111, 156–168. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Sazanov, Y. I. & Parin, N. V., 1977. Description of a new genus and species of slickheads, Microphotolepis multipunctata (Alepocephalidae, Osteichthys) from Indonesian Seas. Trudӯ Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 107, 49–53. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Steedman, H. F., 1974. Laboratory methods in the study of marine zooplankton. A summary report on the results of Joint Working Group 23 of SCCR and UNESCO, 1968–1972. Journal du Conseil, 35, 351–358.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T. & Kishida, S., 1977. The second specimen of the alepccephalid fish, Rouleina tanakae, collected off Kyushu, Japan. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 24, 141–143.Google Scholar
Wisner, R. L., 1976. New data on the rare alepocephalid fish Photostylus pycnopterus. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 75, 153–158.Google Scholar