Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:52:47.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure and Mode of Life of the Pyramidellidae, Parasitic Opisthobranchs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

V. Fretter  and
A. Graham
V. Fretter
Affiliation:
From the Department of Zoology, Birkbeck College, University of London
A. Graham
Affiliation:
From the Department of Zoology, Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The family Pyramidellidae contains a number of species of gastropod molluscs of similar structure and mode of life.

The shell is calcareous and spirally wound and may be closed by an operculum. The foot bears a transverse fold anteriorly, the mentum (Fig. 1, MT), separating the opening of the penial sheath (PO) below from the mouth (M) above. It has a lateral glandular streak on each side (Fig. 2), presumably sensory.

The head has ear-shaped tentacles (Fig. 1, T), richly innervated and with cilia setting up a strong water current, so that they constitute a powerful sensory mechanism. The eyes (E) lie between the tentacles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , October 1949 , pp. 493 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ankel, W. E., 1936. Prosobranchia in: Grimpe, G. and Wagler, E., Die Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee, Teil IXb. Leipzig. 240 pp.Google Scholar
Ankel, W. E., 1938. Erwerb und Aufnahme der Nahrung bei den Gastropoden. Verh. dtsch. Zool. Ges., Zool. Anz., Suppl. XI, pp. 223–95.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. & Hanley, S., 1853. British Mollusca. London.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1939. The structure and function of the alimentary canal of some tecti-branch molluscs, with a note on excretion. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LIX, pp. 599–646.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1940. On the structure of the gut of the ascoglossan nudibranchs. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, B, Vol. CX, pp. 185–98.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1943. Studies in the functional morphology and embryology of Onchidella celtica (Forbes & Hanley) and their bearing on its relationships. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXV, pp. 685–720.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1946. The genital ducts of Theodoxus, Lamellaria and Trivia, and a discussion on their evolution in the prosobranchs. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVI, pp. 312–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretter, V., 1948. The structure and life history of some minute prosobranchs of rockpools: Skeneopsis planorbis (Fabricius), Omalogyra atomus (Philippi), Rissoella diaphana (Alder) and Rissoella opalina (Jeffreys). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVII, pp. 597–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1949. Feeding and reproduction in the pyramidellids. Nature, London, Vol. CLXIII, pp. 361–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, A. P., 1934. The littoral zone. Journ. Conch. Vol. XX, pp. 65–76.Google Scholar
Graham, A., 1932. On the structure and function of the alimentary canal of the limpet. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LVII, pp. 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A., 1939. On the structure of the alimentary canal of style-bearing prosobranchs. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, B, Vol. CIX, pp. 75–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A., 1949. The molluscan stomach. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LXI, pp. 737–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 1867. British Conchology, Vol. IV. 486 pp. London.Google Scholar
Kœhler, R. & Vaney, C., 1908. Description d'un nouveau genre de Prosobranches parasite sur certains Echinides. (Pelseneeria nov.gen.). Bull. Inst. océ'anogr. Monaco, no. 118, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1932. The eggs and early larvae of two commensal gastropods, Stilifer stylifer and Odostomia eulimoides. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, pp. 117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. T., 1900. Additions to ‘British Conchology’. Journ. Conch. Vol. IX, pp. 284–96.Google Scholar
Medcof, J. C., 1948. A snail commensal with the soft-shell clam. Journ. Fish. Res. Board Canada, Vol. VII. [Not seen.]Google Scholar
Mørch, O. A. L., 1865. On the systematic value of the organs employed in the classification of Molluscs. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 3, Vol. XVI, pp. 385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1942. The excitation of nematocysts. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. XIX, pp. 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1899. Recherches morphologiques et phylogénétiques sur les mollusques archaiques. Mém. cour. Mém. Sav. étr., Acad. Roy. Belg., Vol. LVII, pp. 1–112.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1914. Ethologie de quelques Odostomia et d'un Monstrillide parasite de l'un d'eux. Bull. Sci. France Belgique, sér. 7, Vol. XLVIII, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Pruvot-Fol, A., 1930. L'appareil copulateur de la Philine et du Notarchus. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., T. LXX, pp. 45–51.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, E., 1944. Faunistic and biological notes on marine invertebrates. I. Vidensk. Medd. naturh. Foren. Kbh., Bd. CVII, pp. 207–15.Google Scholar
Thiele, J., 1929. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde. Teil I. Jena.Google Scholar
Thiele, J., 1931. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde. Teil. II. Jena.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates. Medd. Komm. Havundersøg., Kbh., ser. Plankton. Bd. IV pp. 1–523.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1947. The pallial organs in the aspidobranch Gastropoda and their evolution throughout the Mollusca. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B, Vol. CCXXXII, pp. 443–518.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1932. The British marine Mollusca. Journ. Conch., Vol. XIX, pp. 211–52.Google Scholar