Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:02:12.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in the genus Fucus L. I. Fucus distichus L. emend. Powell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. T. Powell
H. T. Powell
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The taxonomic status and nomenclature of the hermaphrodite forms of Fucus (other than the alga currently known as F. spiralis L. and certain hybrid forms) usually included under the name Fucus inflatus L. by European authors, but under several specific names by N. American and some other authors, is discussed. It is considered that the numerous forms described are best interpreted for the present as forms of a single, extremely plastic and widely distributed species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 1957 , pp. 407 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agardh, C. A., 1820. Species algarum... Vol. 1, Pt. 1, 168 pp. Lund.Google Scholar
Agardh, C. A., 1821. Icones algarum ineditae. Fasc. 2, 2 pp., pls. 11–20. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Agardh, J. G., 1868. Bidrag till Kännedomen af Spetsbergens Alger. Tillägg till föregaende afhandling. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., Bd. 7, No. 8, pp. 27–49, pl. 3.Google Scholar
Anon, , 1863. Fucus furcatus Agardh, a new British seaweed. J. Bot., Lond., Vol. 1, p. 283.Google Scholar
Areschoug, J. E., 1868. Slagtena Fucus (L.) Decaisne & Thuret och Pycnophycus Kütz. jemte tillhörande arter. Bot. Notiser, 1868, No. 3, pp. 99–115.Google Scholar
Arwidsson, Th., 1937. Meeresalgen aus Vestagder und Rogaland. Nyt. Mag. Naturv., Bd. 76, pp. 85–149.Google Scholar
Batters, E. A. L., 1902. A catalogue of the British marine algae… J. Bot., Lond., Vol. 40, Supply 107 pp.Google Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1902. Marine algae. Botany of the Faeröes, Pan II, pp. 339–532, pis. XIII-XXIV. Copenhagen,Google Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1903. (Issued separately.) 1903. The marine algae of the Shetlands, J. Bot. Lond., Vol. 41, pp. 300–6.Google Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1904. Om Algevegetationen ved Faeroernes Kyster, en Plantegeografisk Under-sogelse. 122 pp., 12 pis. Copenhagen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1905. The algae-vegetation of the Faeröese coasts, with remarks on the phyto-geography. Botany of the Faeröes, Part III, pp. 683–834. Copenhagen, 1908. (Issued separately.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, E. M., Conway, E., Lodge, S. M. & Powell, H. T, 1954. The raising of intertidal algal zones on Fair Isle. J. Ecol., Vol. 42, pp. 283–8.Google Scholar
Carruthers, W., 1863. Fucus distichus Linn, as an Irish plant. J. Bot., Lond., Vol. 1, PP 353–5. Pl. 12.Google Scholar
Carruthers, W., 1864. Note on the Kilkee Fucus. J. Bot., Lond., Vol. 2, p. 54.Google Scholar
Decaisne, J. & Thuret, G., 1845. Recherches sur les anthéridies et les spores de quelques Fucus. Ann. Set. nat., Ser. 3, Bot., T. 3, pp. 5–15, pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
De La Pylaie, A. J. M. B., 1829. Flora de Terre-Neuve et des iles Saint Pierre et Miclon. 128 pp. Paris. [The plates of this work were never published.]Google Scholar
De Toni, J. B., 1895. Sylloge Algarum omnium hucusque cognitarum. Vol. III, Fucoideae, 638 pp. Patavia.Google Scholar
Doty, M. S., 1947. The marine algae of Oregon. Part 1. Chlorophyta and Phaeophyta. Farlowia, Vol. 3, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
Dunn, M. D., 1937. Notes on the flora of Loch Harray and Loch Stenness…. Trans.hot. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 32, Pt. 2, pp. 368–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Rietz, G. E., 1947. Wellengrenzen als okologische Aquivalente der Wasserstandslinien. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, Bd. 25, pp. 534–50, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Esper, E. J. C, 1800. Icones Fucorum… Erster Theil, Viertes Heft, pp. 167–217 [including many erroneous page numbers], pis. 88–111. [This reference not seen; obtained from Silva, 1953.]Google Scholar
Farlow, W. G., 1881. The Marine Algae of New England and Adjacent Coast. Reprinted from Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish, for 1879, Appendix A–I, 210 pp., 15 pls. Washington. 'Flora Danica.’ Icones Plantarum sponte nascentium in regnis Daniae et Norwegiae, in ducatibus Slesvici et Holsatiae, et in comitatibtis Oldenburgi et Delmenhorstiae: ad illustrandum opus de iisdem Plantis, Regio jussu exarandum, Florae Danicae nomine inscriptum. [Usually quoted as ‘Flora Danica’.] Edited at first by G. C. Oeder, later by others. 17 vols. (and 1 vol. Supplement), 3060 (and 180) pis., with descriptive letterpress. Hafniae, (1761) 1764–1883. (See also Oeder, 1767, and Vahl, 1794.)Google Scholar
Foslie, M., 1886. Kritisk fortegnelse over Norges havsalger efter aeldre botaniske arbeider indtil aar 1850. Tromsa Mus. Aarsh., Vol. 9, pp. 85–137.Google Scholar
Fritsch, F. E., 1945. The Structure and Reproduction of the Algae. Vol. 2, 939 pp.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, N. L., 1922. The genus Fucus on the Pacific coast of North America. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot., Vol. 10, No. 1, 181 pp., incl. 60 pls.Google Scholar
Gauld, D. T., Bagenal, T. B. & Connell, J. H., 1953. The marine fauna and flora of St Kilda, 1952. Scot. Nat., Vol. 65, pp. 29–49.Google Scholar
Gmelin, S. G., 1768. Historia Fucorum. 239 pp., 34 pls. Petropoli.Google Scholar
Gray, S. O., 1867. British Sea-Weeds, xxiii, 312 pp., 16 pis. col. London.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. H., 1864. Fucus anceps Ward & Harvey. A letter in Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 3rd. Ser., Vol. 13, p. 184.Google Scholar
Hornemann, J. W., 1827. Nomenclatura Florae Danicae, emendata cum indice systematico et alphabetico. 214 pp. Hafniae.Google Scholar
Hudson, W., 1762. Flora Anglica. xv, 506 pp. London.Google Scholar
Hudson, W., 1778. Flora Anglica. Ed. 2, xxxviii, 690 pp. London.Google Scholar
Hygen, G & Jorde, I., 1935. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Algenflora der norwegischen Westkiiste. Bergens Mus. Aarb. 1934, Nr. 9, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Hylmö, D. E., 1933. Algenimmigration nach der schwedischen Westküste. Bot. Notiser, 1933, pp. 377–9O.Google Scholar
Inoh, S., 1935. Embryological studies on Pelvetia wrightii Yendo and Fucus evanescens Ag. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ., Ser. V, Bot., Vol. V, No. 1, pp. 9–23, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Jónsson, H., 1903. The marine algae of Iceland. II. Phaeophyceae. Bot. Tidsskr., Bd. 25, pp. 141–95Google Scholar
Kjellman, F. R., 1883. The algae of the Arctic Sea. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl, Bd. 20, No. 5, 350 pp., 31 pls.Google Scholar
Kjeixman, F. R., 1890. Handbok i Skandinaviens Hafsalgflora. I. Fucoideae. 103 pp. Stockholm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleen, A. E., 1874. Om Nordlandens hogre hafsalger. Ofvers. VetenskAkad. Fork., Stockh., No. 9, pp. 3–465 pls. 9, 10.Google Scholar
Kützing, F. T., 1860. Tabulae Phycologicae, oder Abbildungen der Tange. Bd. 10, 39 pp., 100 pls. Nordhausen.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1947. Die Phaeophyceen der schwedischen Westkiiste. Lunds Univ. Arsskr., N.F., Avd. 2, Bd. 43, Nr. 4, 99 pp., 18 pis.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, J. (Editor)et ah, 1952. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature… Adopted… Stockholm, July 1950. 228 pp. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Levring, T., 1937. Zur Kenntnis der Algenflora der norwegischen Westkiiste. Lunds Univ. Arsskr., N.F., Avd. 2, Bd. 33, Nr. 8, 148 pp., 4 pls.Google Scholar
Levring, T., 1946. Nagra havsalgfynd vid den svenska vastkusten. Acta Hon. gothoburg., 16, pp. 191–4.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1954. The ecology of exposed rocky shores of Caithness. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 62, pp. 695–723, 4 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, J., 1777. Flora Scotica. 2 Vols. London.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C, 1737. Flora Lapponica. Ed. 1. Amstelaedami.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C, 1753. Species Plantarum. Ed. 1, 2T. Holmiae.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C, 1767. Systema Naturae. Ed. 12, 3T. Holmiae, 1766–68. (T. 1,1766; T. 2, 1767; T. 3, 1768.)Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C, 1774. Systema Vegetabilium. Gottingae and Gothae. [This is a new edition of the botanical part (T. 2) of the Systema Naturae and counts on from the 12th edition (1766–68) of that work.]Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C, 1779. Systema Plantarum. Francofurti and Moenum.Google Scholar
Lund, S., 1949a. Nye Alger for de danske Farvande. (With summary in English.) Bot. Tidsskr., Bd. 48, Hft. 3, pp. 231–53.Google Scholar
Lund, S., 1949b. Immigration of algae into Danish waters. Nature, Lond., Vol. 164, p. 616.Google Scholar
Lyngbye, H. C, 1819. Tentamen Hydrophytologiae Danicae. 248 pp., 70 pls. Hafniae.Google Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A Handbook of the British Seaweeds. 478 pp. London.Google Scholar
Nichol, E. A. T., 1938. The brackish-water lochs of Orkney. Proc. roy. Soc, Edinb., Vol. 58, pp. 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norum, E., 1913. Brunalger fra Haugesund og Omegn. Nyt. Mag. Naturv., Bd. 51, pp. 137–60, pi. 2.Google Scholar
Oeder, G. C. (Editor), 1767. In 'Flora Danica' [q.v.], Vol. 2, fasc. 6, tab. 351.Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1953. A preliminary check-list of British marine algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, H. T., 1954. The distribution, ecology and taxonomic status of forms of Fucus infiatus L. in Britain and Ireland. Summary in Rapp. Comm., 8me Congr. Int. Bot., Paris 1954, Section 17, pp. 135–6.Google Scholar
Powell, H. T. & Lewis, J. R., 1952. Occurrence of Fucus infiatus L. forma distichus (L.) Borgesen on the north coast of Scotland. Nature, Lond., Vol. 169, p. 508.Google Scholar
Printz, H., 1926. Die Algenvegetation des Trondhjemsf jordes. Skr. norske VidenskAkad., I Mat.-Naturv. Klasse, No. 5, 274 pp., 10 pls.Google Scholar
Rosenvinge, L. K., 1893. Gronlands Havalger. Medd. Granland, Bd. 3, pp. 763–981, 2 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, S., 1945. A Catalogue of the Linnaean Herbarium. 226 pp. London.Google Scholar
Setchell, W. A. & Gardner, N. L., 1925. The marine algae of the Pacific coast of North America. Part III, Melanophyceae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot., Vol. 8, Part 3, pp. 383–898, incl. pls. 34–107.Google Scholar
Silva, P. C, 1953. The identity of certain Fuci of Esper. WasmannJ. Biol, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 221–32.Google Scholar
Smith, G. M., 1944. Marine Algae of the Monterey Peninsula California. 622 pp., incl. 98 pls. Stanford University Press, California; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sundene, O., 1953. The algal vegetation of Oslofjord. Skr. norske VidenskAkad., I Mat. Naturv. Klasse, No. 2, 244 pp., 1 end-map.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. R., 1937. Marine Algae Of The Northeastern Coast Of North America. Univ. Mich. Stud., Vol. 13, 427 pp., 59 pls.Google Scholar
Turner, D., 1802. A Synopsis of the British Fuci. 400 pp. Yarmouth.Google Scholar
Turner, D., 1808. Fuci… Vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Turner, D., 1809. Fuci… Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Vahl, M. (Editor), 1794. In 'Flora Danica' [q.v.], Vol. 7, fasc. 19, tab. 1127.Google Scholar
Yendo, K., 1907. The Fucaceae of Japan. J. Coll. Sd. Tokyo, Vol. 21, No. 12, 174 pp.,18 pls.Google Scholar
Zinova, A. D., 1953. Opredelitel’ burykh vodoroslei severnykh morei SSSR. [Title transl.: Classification of brown algae of the northern seas of the U.S.S.R.] 225 pp. (153 illus.) Bot. Inst., Acad. Sci., U.S.S.R. Moscow & Leningrad. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Zinova, A. D., 1954. [Title transl.: Notes for Flora of seaweeds found in the White Sea.]Acta Inst. bot. Acad. Sci. URSS, Ser. 2, Plantae Cryptogamae, Fasc. 9, pp. 245–58. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Zinova, E. S., 1933. Vodorosli Kamchatki. [Algae of Kamchatka]. Issledovaniia morei S.S.S.R., Fasc. 17, pp. 7–42. [In Russian, with short summary in French.]Google Scholar
Zinova, E. S., 1954. [Seaweeds found (a) in Okhotsk Sea, (Jb) in the Gulf of Tartary, (c) round south-eastern Kamchatka (Titles transl.).] Acta Inst. bot. Acad. Sci. URSS, Ser. 2, Plantae Cryptogamae, Fasc. 9, pp. 259–310; 311–64, 365–400. [In Russian.]Google Scholar