Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:19:02.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The zonation of psammolittoral harpacticoid copepods around the Isle of Man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Colin G. Moore
Colin G. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The early qualitative works on the harpacticoid fauna of the British Isles by T. & A. Scott, Norman, Brady, Gurney and Thompson largely omitted the intertidal psammic biotopes. Nicholls (1935, 1939) did much to redress the situation, describing many new species of interstitial harpacticoids from the sandy shores of the Firth of Clyde. Although his studies were taxonomic, he supplied some useful information on the distribution of the species. Some ecological data is also to be found in subsequent works on the east coast of Ireland (Wells, 1963 a; O'Riordan, 1971), the Exe estuary (Wells, 1963 b) and the Isles of Scilly (Wells, 1961, 1970). The only detailed studies of interstitial harpacticoid zonation on British coasts are those of Harris (1972) for the lower shore at Whitsand Bay, Cornwall, and Mclntyre & Murison (1973) for Firemore Bay, Scotland.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , August 1979 , pp. 711 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boaden, P. J. S., 1963. The interstitial fauna of some North Wales beaches. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 43, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, P., 1971. Copépodes Harpacticoides marins des environs de la Rochelle. 2. Espèces de la zone intertidale d'Yves. Téthys, 3, 411–433.Google Scholar
Bodin, P., 1977. Les peuplements de Copépodes Harpacticoides (Crustacea) des sédiments meubles de la zone intertidale des cotes charentaises (Atlantique). Mémoires du Muséum nationale d'histoire naturelle, série A, 104, 1–120.Google Scholar
Geddes, D. C., 1967. Studies on Harpacticoid Copepods from the Isle of Anglesey. M.Sc. Thesis, Marine Science Laboratories, University College of North Wales.Google Scholar
Harris, R. P., 1972. Horizontal and vertical distribution of the interstitial harpacticoid copepods of a sandy beach. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 375–387.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., 1972. The ecology of the molluscs of Thalassia communities, Jamaica, West Indies. II. Molluscan population variability along an environmental stress gradient. Marine Biology, 14, 304–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, B.-O., 1967. The significance of grain size and pore water content for the interstitial fauna of sandy beaches. Oikos, 18, 311–322.Google Scholar
Jansson, B.-O., 1968. Quantitative and experimental studies of the interstitial fauna in four Swedish sandy beaches. Oikos, 5, 1–71.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. G., 1970. Variations in diversity within benthic marine communities. American Naturalist, 104, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klie, W., 1929. Die Copepoda Harpacticoida der südlichen und mittleren Ostsee mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Sandfauna der Kieler Bucht. Zoologische Jahrbücher (Systematik, Okologie und Geographie der Tiere), 57, 329–386.Google Scholar
Kunz, H., 1971. Verzeichnis der marinen und Brackwasser bewohnenden Harpacticoides (Crustacea Copepoda) der deutschen Meeresküste. Kieler Meeresforschungen, 27, 73–93.Google Scholar
Kunz, H., 1977. Marine und Brackzvasser bewohnende Harpacticoidea (Crustacea Copepoda) der Nord- und Ostseeküste der BRD, teil 4. 22 pp. Saarbrücken: Universität Saarlandes. (Fundortkataster der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.)Google Scholar
Lang, K., 1948. Monographic der Harpacticiden. 1683 pp. Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Lang, K., 1965. Copepoda Harpacticoidea from the Californian Pacific coast. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 10(2), 1–560.Google Scholar
Lasker, R., Wells, J. B. J. & Mcintyre, A. D., 1970. Growth, reproduction, respiration and carbon utilisation of the sand dwelling harpacticoid copepod, Asellopsis intermedia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, A. D. & Murison, D. J., 1973. The meiofauna of a flatfish nursery ground. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 53, 93–118.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A., Erasmus, T. & Furstenberg, J. P., 1977. Migrations of sandy beach meiofauna. Zoologica Africana, 12, 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, A. & Moore, C. G., 1978. Three new species of Harpacticoida (Crustacea, Copepoda) from sandy beaches in Algoa Bay, South Africa, with keys to the genera Arenosetella, Hastigerella, Leptastacus and Psammasiacus. Annals of the South African Museum, 76, 191–211.Google Scholar
Mielke, W., 1975. Systematik der Copepoda eines Sandstrandes der Nordseeinsel Sylt. Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens, 52, 134 pp.Google Scholar
Mielke, W., 1976. Ökologie der Copepoda eines Sandstrandes der Nordseeinsel Sylt. Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens, 59, 86 pp.Google Scholar
Moore, C. G., 1975a. Studies on the Ecology and Taxonomy of Manx Meiofauna. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Moore, C. G., 1975b. A review of the harpacticoid genus Paraleptastacus (Crustacea, Copepoda). Journal of Natural History, 9, 495–507.Google Scholar
Moore, C. G., 1976. The harpacticoid families Ectinosomatidae and Diosaccidae (Crustacea, Copepoda) from the Isle of Man. Journal of Natural History, 10, 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. G., 1979a. The distribution and ecology of psammolittoral meiofauna around the Isle of Man. Cakiers de biologie marine, (in the Press.)Google Scholar
Moore, C. G., 1979b. Analysis of the associations of meiobenthic Copepoda of the Irish Sea. Journal of thz Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59. (In the Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A. G., 1935. Copepods from the interstitial fauna of a sandy beach. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 20, 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A. G., 1939. Some new sand-dwelling copepods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 23, 327–341.Google Scholar
Noodt, W., 1952. Marine Harpacticiden (Cop.) aus dem eulittoralen Sandstrand der Insel Sylt. Abhandlungen. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, 3, 103–142.Google Scholar
Noodt, W., 1957. Zur Ökologie der Harpacticoidea (Crust. Cop.) des Eulittorals der deutschen Meeresküste und der angrenzenden Brackgewässer. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 46, 149–242.Google Scholar
O'riordan, C. E., 1971. Meiobenthic Harpacticoida on the east coast of Ireland. Proceedings of thz Royal Irish Academy (B), 71, 191–209.Google Scholar
Ott, J., 1972. Studies on the diversity of the nematode fauna in intertidal sediments. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Symposium on Marine Biology (ed. Battaglia, B.), pp. 275–285. Padova: Piccin.Google Scholar
Pennak, R. W., 1942. Ecology of some copepods inhabiting intertidal beaches near Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Ecology, 23, 446–456.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C., 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. 286 pp. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Renaud-Debyser, J., 1963. Recherches écologiques sur la faune interstitielle des sables (Bassin d'Arcachon ile de Bimini, Bahamas). Vie et milieu, 15 (Suppl.), 1–157.Google Scholar
Renaud-Debyser, J. & Salvat, B., 1963. Éléments de prospérité des biotopes des sédiments meubles intertidaux et écologie de leurs populations en microfaune et macrofaune. Vie et milieu, 14, 463–550.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. American Naturalist, 102, 243–282.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P., 1968. Die quantitative Verteilung und Populations- dynamik des Mesopsammons am Gezeiten-Sandstrand der Nordsee-Insel Sylt. I. Faktorengefuge und biologische Gliederung des Lebensraumes. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 53, 723–779.Google Scholar
Wells, J. B. J., 1961. Interstitial copepods from the Isles of Scilly. Crustaceana, 2, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. B. J., 1963a. On some new and rare Crustacea from Northern Ireland. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6, 85–96.Google Scholar
Wells, J. B. J., 1963b. Copepoda from the littoral region of the estuary of the River Exe (Devon, England). Crustaceana, 5, 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. B. J., 1970. The marine flora and fauna of the Isles of Scilly, Crustacea: Copepoda: Harpacticoida. Journal of Natural History, 4, 255–268.Google Scholar
Wells, J. B. J. & Clark, M. E., 1965. The interstitial Crustacea of two beaches in Portugal. Revista de biologia, Lisbon, 5, 87–108.Google Scholar
Wieser, W., Ott, J., Schiemer, F. & Gnaiger, E., 1974. An ecophysiological study of some meiofauna species inhabiting a sandy beach at Bermuda. Marine Biology, 26, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, W. J., 1974. Benthic diversity in the Rhine-Meuse estuary. Hydrobiological Bulletin, 8, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar