Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:58:07.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Analysis of Small Holder Objectives in the Dominican Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Margaret Andrews
Margaret Andrews*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland
Get access

Extract

The question of the operational objectives of small holder, “peasant” farmers has received considerable attention in the literature of agricultural development and production economics. Justification could not be made for rehashing this old issue, were it not for almost universal incomplete specification by most writers on the subject. No writer denies the dual nature of the peasant household, but few have made a serious attempt theoretically, and even less empirically, to integrate consumption activities into an analytical framework of the small farm.

Type
Production and Marketing
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 91 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1/

Published with the approval of the Director of the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station as Scientific Article No. A 2128, Contribution No. 5090.

References

1 Chenarreddy, V., “Production Efficiency in South Indian Agriculture,” Journal of Farm Economics. 49: 816–820, November 1967.Google Scholar
2 Dillon, John L. and Anderson, J. R., “Allocative Efficiency, Traditional Agriculture and Risk,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53: 26–32, February 1971.Google Scholar
3 Higgins, Benjamin, “The Employment Problem in Development,” in Micro Aspects of Development, ed. Ayal, Eliezer B., New York: Praeger Publishers, 1973.Google Scholar
4 Hopper, D. W., “Allocative Efficiency in a Traditional Indian Agriculture,” Journal of Farm Economics. 47: 611–624, August 1965.Google Scholar
5 Joy, Leonard, “The Economics of Food Production,” African Affairs, 83: 317–328, April 1974.Google Scholar
6 Lin, William, Dean, G. W. and Moore, C. V., “An Empirical Test of Utility vs. Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 56: 497–508, August 1974.Google Scholar
7 Lipton, Michael, “The Theory of the Optimizing Peasant,” Journal of Development Studies. 4: 327–351, April 1968.Google Scholar
8 Miricale, Marvin P., “Subsistence Agriculture: Analytical Problems and Alternative Concepts,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 50: 292–310, May 1968.Google Scholar
9 Nakajima, C., “Subsistence and Commercial Family Farms: Some Theoretical Models of Subjective Equilibrium,” in Subsistence Agriculture and Economic Development, ed. Wharton, C. R. Jr., Chicago: Adline Publishing Company, 1968.Google Scholar
10 Schultz, T. W., Transforming Traditional Agriculture, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
11 Singh, I. J., “Recursive Programming Models of Agricultural Development,” in Studies in Economic Planning Over Space and Time, eds. Judge, G. G. and Takayama, T., Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1973.Google Scholar
12 Singh, I. J., “The Transformation of Traditional Agriculture: A Case Study of Punjab, India,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 53: 275–284.Google Scholar
13 Thorner, D. et. al., A. V. Chayanov on The Theory of Peasant Economy, Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
14 Yotopolous, P. A., “On the Efficiency of Resource Utilization in Subsistence Agriculture,” Food Research Institute Studies. 8: 125–235, 1968.Google Scholar