Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:02:38.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Approaches to Research on Transferable Development Rights Proposals: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Joseph Diamond
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Connecticut
Bruce E. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources, University of New Hampshire
Get access

Extract

Present land use control mechanisms are seen as inadequate for the preservation of open space, agricultural land, and other “uneconomic” uses of land. Many proposals have been cited as possible solutions to the problems created by present land use control mechanisms. The transfer of development rights (hereafter known as TDR's) is one such proposal. This mechanism for land use control can be of several forms. There are severe theoretical and practical problems, to be discussed, which a transfer of development rights program must overcome if it is to function in practical application.

Type
Comments and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper results from research project funds of NE-125, “Socioeconomic Factors and Rural Land Use.” The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful comments put forth by Marilyn Altobello, Robert Leonard, Edmund Jansen, and Paul Bruns. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Contribution No. 762 and Scientific Contribution No. 970 of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Barrows, Richard L. and Prenguber, Bruce A. Transfer of Development Rights: A Theoretical and Case Study Analysis of New Land Use Policy. Center for Resource Policy Studies, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, February 1976.Google Scholar
Field, Barry C. and Barclay, R. A.Accounting for the Social Benefits and Costs of Development Right Purchase Programs.” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, April 1977.Google Scholar
Field, Barry C. and Conrad, J. M.Economic Issues in Programs of Transferable Development Rights.” Land Economics. November 1975.Google Scholar
Ishee, Sidney, “Preserving Open Space Through the Private Transfer of Development Rights.” Paper presented at Inaugural Convention of the Eastern Economics Association, SUNY at Albany, October, 1974.Google Scholar
Libby, Larry. “Conflicting Rights to Rural Resources: A Research Strategy for Improved Public Choice.” Paper presented at the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council Annual Meeting, Durham, New Hampshire, June 1978.Google Scholar
Major, D. C.Benefit-Cost Ratios for Projects in Multiple Objective Project Impacts.” Water Resources Research, 9(1973): 1.Google Scholar
Merriam, Dwight H.Making TDR Work.” The North Carolina Law Review, January 1978.Google Scholar
Small, Leslie E., Kasper, Victor Jr. and Derr, Donn A. Transfer of Development Rights Marketability. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University, 1978.Google Scholar
Smith, Stewart Nelson. The Demand for Transferable Development Rights: Theory, Specification, and Estimation Model. Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Connecticut, 1977.Google Scholar