Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:59:48.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design of Programs Using Transferable Development Rights to Preserve Farmland in the Northeast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Carl C. Mabbs-Zeno
Carl C. Mabbs-Zeno*
Affiliation:
Economics and Statistics Service, Natural Resource Economics Division, USDA
Get access

Extract

Permanent conversion of agricultural land to urban uses has concerned both suppliers and demanders of agricultural products in recent years. Although controversy on the importance of the problems associated with this conversion persists among economists (General Accounting Office, Healy, Plaut), policymakers across the nation have accepted the preservation of farmland as a goal requiring government action. All but two States (Georgia and Mississippi) provide some form of preferential property tax assessment for farmland (Davies and Beiden). Most localities with zoning authority attempt to protect farmland, and several less common land use management institutions have been implemented with farmland preservation as a principal goal.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 57 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Costonis, John J. Space Adrift: Saving Urban Landmarks Through the Chicago Plan. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1974.Google Scholar
Davies, Bob and Belden, Joe. A Survey of State Programs to Preserve Farmland. Council of Environmental Quality, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1979.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office, Comptroller General. Preserving American's Farmland—A Goal the Federal Government Should Support, CED-79-109, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1979.Google Scholar
Healy, Robert. The Market for Rural Land. Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC, 1981.Google Scholar
Levin, Melvin R., Rose, Jerome G., and Slavet, Joseph S. New Approaches to State Land-Use Policies. D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Massachusetts, 1974.Google Scholar
Lynch, Kevin. “Controlling the Location and Timing of Development by the Distribution of Marketable Development Rights,” Transfer of Development Rights, Rose, Jerome, ed. Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1975, pp. 259–64.Google Scholar
Mabbs-Zeno, Carl C. “The Economics and Design of Transferable Development Rights.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economics and Statistics Service, working paper, 1981.Google Scholar
National agricultural lands study—final report. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, January 18, 1981.Google Scholar
Ord, Timothy. “Building a City for 100 Suburbs.” Business Week, November 24, 1980, pp. 34D–34FGoogle Scholar
Plaut, Thomas R. “Urban Expansion and the Loss of Farmland in the United States: Implications for the Future,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62 (1980): 537: 42.Google Scholar