Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:11:23.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of Marketing Strategies for Potatoes in Upstate New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Ralph Young  and
William G. Tomek
Ralph Young
Affiliation:
Cornell University
William G. Tomek
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access

Extract

A long-standing problem in agricultural marketing is the question of “optimal” marketing patterns for a seasonally produced crop. When futures markets exist, agricultural economists have often recommended their use to improve marketing decisions, but farmer use of futures as an aid to marketing is not common. This paper considers the potential benefits to upstate New York farmers of hedging using Maine potato futures contracts. Benefits are defined in terms of the mean and variance of returns from alternative marketing strategies for potatoes. A portfolio approach is implicit in the analysis which also relies, in part, on the formulation of a simple price-forecasting model.

Type
Commercial Agriculture
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , October 1978 , pp. 57 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

With the usual caveat, comments by R. Brian How are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Anderson, J. R., Dillon, J. L., and Hardaker, B. Agricultural Decision Analysis. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Federal-State Market News Service. Marketing New York (Upstate and Long Island), Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware Potatoes. USDA, AMS, Rochester, N.Y., various issues.Google Scholar
Gray, R. W. “The Future Market for Maine Potatoes: An Appraisal.” Food Res. Inst. Stud. 11(1972): 313–41.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. Portfolio Selection — Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
New York Mercantile Exchange. Futures Trading Fact Sheet. Office of Information and Statistics, New York, various issues.Google Scholar
Paul, A. B., Heifner, R. G., and Helmuth, J. W. Farmers’ Use of Forward Contracts and Futures Markets. USDA ERS Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 320, 1976.Google Scholar
Peck, A. E. “Hedging and Income Stability: Concepts, Implications, and an Example.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 57(1975): 410–19.Google Scholar
Telser, L. G. and Higinbotham, H. N. “Organized Futures Markets: Costs and Benefits.” J. Pol. Econ. 85(1977): 969–1000.Google Scholar
Tomek, W. G. and Gray, R. W. “Temporal Relationships Among Prices on Commodity Futures Markets: Their Allocative and Stabilizing Role.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 52(1970): 372–380.Google Scholar
Tomek, William G. Hedging in Commodity Futures: A Guide for Farmers in the Northeast. Unpublished manuscript, July 1978 (publication forthcoming).Google Scholar
USDA. Crop Production. Stat. Rep. Ser., March, October, various years.Google Scholar