No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Coverage of Agricultural Workers Under the Unemployment Compensation Amendment of 1976
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2017
Abstract
The “Unemployment Compensation Amendments of 1976” are expected to insure about two-fifths of all hired agricultural workers. Large interstate variations in the proportion of workers insured result from their differing work histories and state's qualifying provisions. Of these insured workers, three-tenths will receive benefits, ranging from about $250 to $1,000 depending upon the state benefit schedule and the worker's employment history. Average benefits amount to 14 percent of earnings of the workers which average $3,613. Nearly one-fourth of the beneficiaries will exhaust their benefit entitlements.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , April 1978 , pp. 23 - 33
- Copyright
- Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association
Footnotes
This research was funded by NEC-21, the succssor project of NE-58 (“Economic and Sociological Studies of Agricultural Labor in the Northeast States”), and by the USDL, ETA, UI Service. Published with approval of the director of the Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station as Miscellaneous Paper 809.
I want to express my appreciation to Mrs. Linda Graham for expert programming and editorial assistance and to Drs. R. Bieker, Delaware State College, D. Fisher, Cornell, B. Emerson, University of Florida, A. Shapley, Michigan State University, D. Thatch, Rutgers and anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on earlier drafts on this paper.
References
Bauder, W., Elterich, J., Farrish, R. and Holt, J. Impact of Extenstion of Unemployment Insurance of Agriculture. Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 804, January, 1976.Google Scholar
Elterich, G. J. and Graham, L. Interstate Analysis of Unemployment Insurance Provisions and Proposed Changes. Contract UIS-74-1, USDL, Manpower Administration, May 1975.Google Scholar
Elterich, G. J. and Bieker, Richard. “Cost Rates of Unemployment Insurance to Agricultural Employment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 57(1975): 322–329.Google Scholar
Elterich, G. J. and Graham, L. Impact of PL 94–566 on Agricultural Employers and UI Trust Funds in Selected States. US Dept of Labor, ETA, UIS, July 1977.Google Scholar
Elterich, G. Joachim. “Unemployment Insurance Coverage of Agriculture: Policy Alternatives for Selected States.” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council. 6(1977): 129–146.Google Scholar
Elterich, G. Joachim. “Unemployment Insurance, Estimated Cost Rates, Benefits and Tax Burden by Types of Farm.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 59 (1977a): 683–690.Google Scholar
Elterich, G. Joachim. “UI for Agriculture–Issues and Answers.” Monthly Labor Report, April 1978.Google Scholar
Seaver, S. K., Elterich, G. J., Bauder, W. W., Holt, J. S., et al. Economic and Social Considerations in Extending Unemployment Insurance to Agricultural Workers. Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 806, February 1976.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Labor, Manpower Administration, Unemployment Insurance Service. Comparison of State Unemployment Insurance Laws, rev. ed. Washington, January and August 1971a.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Labor. Handbook of Interstate Claims Taking, rev. ed., Washington, 1971b.Google Scholar