Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:51:37.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Tax Reform on the Dairy Farmer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

E.L. LaDue  and
W.R. Bryant
E.L. LaDue
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
W.R. Bryant
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
Get access

Extract

Recent Congressional testimony has focused on the desirability of eliminating certain income tax “preferences” that are important in agriculture. Specifically, separate proposals have urged that capital gains treatment pertaining to livestock, vineyards and orchards be eliminated and that the cash method of tax accounting no longer be permitted. The justification for these proposals is based on the continued activity of wealthy individuals in tax loss or tax sheltered farming, despite provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1969 to limit such ventures. Furthermore, it is argued that these tax preferences result in a greater subsidy to the high tax bracket individual than low tax bracket individual and thus place low income bonafide farmers at a competitive disadvantage which could force them out of business.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 1973 , pp. 80 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Axelrad, Irving L., “Farming As a Tax Shelter: Citrus Groves and Breeding Herds,” Taxes, Vol. 46, December 1968.Google Scholar
2. Bryant, William Russell, “Implications of Present Income Tax Provisions and Potential Effects of Reform on Northeast Dairy Farms,” Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, May 1973, 164 pp.Google Scholar
3. Carman, Hoy F., “Tax Loss Agricultural Investments After Tax Reform,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, November 1972.Google Scholar
4. Davenport, Charles, “The Taxation of Farm Operations,” Before the House Committee on Ways and Means, February 20, 1973.Google Scholar
5. Forker, Olan D., “A Comparison of the Cash and Accrual Methods of Reporting Income: The Macro Impact on Egg Production,” Staff Paper No. 73–8, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, January 1973.Google Scholar
6. Harrison, Virden L. and Fred Woods, W., “Farm and Nonfarm Investment in Commercial Beef Breeding Herds: Incentives and Consequences of the Tax Law,” ERS-497, April 1972.Google Scholar
7. Harrison, Virden L., “Accounting Methods Allowed Farmers : Tax Incentives and Consequences,” ERS-505, January 1973.Google Scholar
8. Hjorth, Roland L., “Tax Problems of Investments in Farm Operations,” Before the House Committee on Ways and Means, February 20, 1973.Google Scholar
9. LaDue, Eddy Lorain, “A Computerized Farm Business Simulator for Research and Farm Planning,” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, 1971, 492 pp.Google Scholar
10. Maer, Claude M. Jr., “Taxation of Livestock Operations,” Before the House Committee on Ways and Means, February 20, 1973.Google Scholar
11. O'Byrne, John C., Farm Income Tax Manual, The Allen Smith Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1970, 1014 pp.Google Scholar
12. “Statement by the American National Cattlemen's Association With Respect to the Taxation of Farm Operations,” Before the House Committee on Ways and Means, February 19, 1973.Google Scholar
13. Scofield, William H., “Nonfarm Equity Capital in Agriculture,” Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 23, July 1972.Google Scholar
14. Woods, W. Fred, “The Tax Reform Act of 1969 – Provisions of Significance to Farmers,” ERS-441, April 1970.Google Scholar