No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Feasibility of Lowering Energy Costs Through Reduced Delivery Frequency
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2017
Abstract
The feasibility of reducing delivery frequency as a means of lowering energy and transportation costs is examined. Four reduced delivery situations are examined using a net present value criteria. While substantial energy savings are possible the cost of equipment necessary to accommodate these reductions outweighs the energy savings at current fuel prices. Substantial fuel price increases are required before such reductions are worthwhile. Good management requires examination of the net effect of energy savings on net revenue.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1980 , pp. 13 - 15
- Copyright
- Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association
Footnotes
The authors wish to acknowledge the helpful comments of the anonymous journal reviewers in this article.
References
Apian, Richard J. and Pratt, Randal D., “Measuring and Improving Wholesale Milk Route Productivity and Profitability,” A Manual for a Management Workshop, Department of Agricultural Economics and the Cooperative Extension Service, The New York State College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, April 1977.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. and Wright, J. W., “Scheduling of Vehicle from a Central Depot to a Number of Delivery Points,” Operations Research, 12: 4, July-August 1964, pp. 568–581.Google Scholar
Hallberg, M. C. and Kriebel, W. R., “Designing Efficient Pick-Up and Delivery Route Systems by Computer,” The Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 782, June 1972.Google Scholar
“Hertz Study Shows 5-Year 50 Percent Increase in Truck Operating Costs,” Refrigerated Transporter, Vol. 3, No. 12, May 1977.Google Scholar
Salkin, M. S. and Shouse, J. C., “Solid Waste Planning in the Northern Counties of the Kiamichi Economic Development District,” Bulletin B-727, Oklahoma State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, July 1976.Google Scholar