Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:14:50.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Four-Legged Recycling Machines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2020

Fred J. Benson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine, Orono
Walter P. Stinson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine, Orono
Get access

Extract

Society's growing concern over environmental pollution has forced American industry to reevaluate its methods of waste disposal. No longer is it socially acceptable or, in many cases, legal to dump untreated by-products into the air, on the land, or into the rivers. Industries have developed various methods for complying with pollution legislation and social demands. Paramount among the programs now in effect are detoxification facilities and waste recycling programs.

Type
Agricultural Production and Land Use
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1/ Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Academy of Sciences, Sixth Revised Edition, 1968 and Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, National Academy of Sciences, Fourth Revised Edition, 1970, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar

2/ Figures derived from Pennsylvania Farm Management Supplement for Farm Credit Analysis Handbook, prepared by Pennsylvania Farm Management Extension Staff.Google Scholar

3/ Doane's Agricultural Report, “Special Report: The Cost Side of Beef and Hog Operations,” Doane's Agricultural Service, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, February 18, 1972, p. 79.Google Scholar

4/ Illinois Extension Service, Summary of Illinois Farm Business Records, 1969 Annual, Circular 1019 (Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1969), p. 9.Google Scholar

5/ Doane's Agricultural Report, op. cit., p. 78.Google Scholar