Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:20:47.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal Production Schedules for a Representative Farm Under Alternative Seasonal Milk Pricing Patterns of the Base-Excess Plan: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Robert A. Milligan
Robert A. Milligan*
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Get access

Extract

In the April, 1981, issue of this Journal, Prindle and Livezey (PL) address the very important question of how a dairy farm manager should attempt to adjust production in response to expected seasonal production patterns of the dairy cow, monthly milk prices and variable milk production costs. The authors construct a representative farm linear programming model to address this important question.

Type
Comment
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1982 , pp. 65 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, C. A. and Chandler, P. J. “Incorporation of Predictive Milk Yield and Dry Matter Into a Maximum Profit Ration Formulation Program,” Journal of Dairy Science, 61 (1978): 1123–1137.Google Scholar
Dairy Records Processing Laboratory. “Holstein M.E. Factors by Age and Month.” Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, March 1980.Google Scholar
Harsh, S., Hillman, D. and Schoonaert, J. Least Cost Dairy Ration—Ration Rx. TelPlan Users Manual No. 31, Michigan State University, 1972.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, W. A., Milligan, R. A., Fox, D. G. and Woodell, M. L. Economic Utilization of Forages in the Production of Milk and Beef in the Northeast United States. Staff Paper No. 79–29, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, August 1979.Google Scholar
Miller, P. D., Lentz, W. E. and Henderson, C. R. “Joint Influence of Month and Age of Calving on Milk Yield of Holstein Cows in the Northeastern United States,” Journal of Dairy Science, 53 (1970): 351–357.Google Scholar
Milligan, R. A. and Knoblauch, W. A. Composition and Cost of Dairy Cow Rations with Varying Hay Crop Quality. Staff Paper No. 80–13, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, presented at the annual meetings of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, June 1980.Google Scholar
Milligan, R. A., Chase, L. E., Sniffen, C. J. and Knoblauch, W. A. Least-Cost Balanced Dairy Rations, NEWPLAN Program 31, Form 6. A.E. Ext. 81–24 and A.S. Mimeo 54, Departments of Agricultural Economics and Animal Science, Cornell University, October 1981.Google Scholar
Nott, S. B., Sargent, F. J. and Search, W. C. Monthly Dairy Herd Growth. TelPlan Users Manual No. 52, Michigan State University, 1975.Google Scholar
Nott, S. B. and Harsh, S. B. Dairy, LP. TelPlan Users Manual No. 65, Michigan State University, 1975.Google Scholar
Oltenacu, P. A., Ainslie, H. R. and Keown, J. F. “Projecting the Income from Milk Sales for a Dairy Enterprise,” Journal of Dairy Science, 59 (1976): 1989–1996.Google Scholar
Oltenacu, P. A., Rounsaville, T. R., Milligan, R. A. and Hintz, R. L. “Relationship Between Days Open and Cumulative Milk Yield at Various Intervals from Parturition for High and Low Producing Cows,” Journal of Dairy Science 63 (1980): 1317–1327.Google Scholar
Prindle, A. M. and Livezey, J. S. “Optimal Production Scheduling for a Representative Farm Under Alternative Seasonal Milk Pricing Patterns of the Base-Excess Plan,” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, 10 (1981): 23–29.Google Scholar
Sniffen, C. J. Personal Communication, November 1981.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, F. W., Milligan, R. A. and Knoblauch, W. A. “The Economic Impact of Improved Drainage on Northern New York Dairy Farms,” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, 8 (1979): 73–85.Google Scholar