Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:34:52.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Name of the Third Kind of Rus and of their City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Omeljan Pritsak
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the works of the 10th-century Arabic classical geographers, as represented by al-Iṣŭakhrī (c. 318–321/930–933) and Ibn Ḥawqal (c. 367/977), there appears a passage which deals with three “kinds” (ṣinf) of Rus. At the mention of the first kind of Rus, only the name of their city is given, while the name of the city of the second “kind”—apart from that of the kind themselves—though mentioned by Ibn Ḥawqal, is not given by al-Iṣṭakhrī.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , January 1967 , pp. 2 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Or should we not do better to correct the source to aṣ-Ṣl'wynyyh? Here I am using transliteration and not transcription of words written in Arabic script.

2 Ibn Foszlans und anderer Araber Berichte über die Russen älterer Zeit, SPb. 1823, 143, 259.

3 “Der dritte Stamm der Rūs nach arabischen Quellen”, Archiv Orientální, 25, 1957, 628–652Google Scholar. After I had completed this paper, my friend DrKeenan, E. L. drew my attention to a recent Russian publication Drevnerusskoe gosudarstvo (Moscow, 1965)Google Scholar where A. P. Novoseltsov discusses, among others, the problem of the third kind of Rus, : “Vostochnye istochniki o vostochnykh Slavyanakh i Rusi VI–IX vv.”, pp. 408–419Google Scholar. His approach, however, does not differ from that of his predecessors, and therefore his tentative identification of the third kind with the region of Rostov-Beloozero is not convincing.

4 Krachkovskii, Ignatii Yu., Izbrannye sochineniya, Vol. 4 (Moscow-Leningrad, 1957), 194–226Google Scholar; Zakhoder, B. N., Kaspiiskii svod svedenii o vostochnoi Evrope [Vol. 1]: Gorgan i Povolzhe v IX–X vv. (Moscow, 1962), 37–51Google Scholar.

5 cf. Minorsky, V. in BSOAS, XXXI, 1, 89Google Scholar.

6 Krachkovskii, I. Yu., Izbrannye sochineniya, Vol. 4, 197Google Scholar.

7 Kramers, J. H., “La question Balḫī-Iṣṭaḫrī— Ibn Ḥawkal et l'Atlas de l'lslam”, Acta Orientalia, 10, 1, 1931, 16–17Google Scholar.

8 Abu Ishak al-Farisi al-Istakhri. Viae regnorum. Descriptio ditionis moslemicae, ed. de Goeje, M. J. (BGA, Vol. 1), second edition, Leiden, 1927, 225–6Google Scholar (for abbreviations, see p. 2).

9 See Masālik va Mamālik by … Istakhrī. Anonymous Persian Translation from V/VI century a.h., ed. Afshar, Iraj, Teheran, 1961, 15–22Google Scholar.

10 Jacut's geographisches Wörterbuch … ed. Wüstenfeld, F., Vol. 4, Leipzig, 18 …, 318–9Google Scholar.

11 Opus geographicum auctore Ibn Ḥauḳal …, ed. Kramers, J. H. (BGA, Vol. 2), second edition, Leiden, 1938–1939, 397Google Scholar (for abbreviations, see p. VIII).

12 On wysw' see Ibn Faḍlān (921–2), MS. of Meshhed, ed. Kovalivsky, A. P., [1 ed.] Putešestvie Ibn-Fadlana na Volgu, Moscow-Leningrad, 1939Google Scholar, [2nd ed.] Kniga Akhmeda Ibn-Fadlana o ego putešestvii na Volgu v 921–2 gg, Kharkov, 1956Google Scholar, Phototyp. 206a, 207b, 208a; al-Bīrūnī, “TaḤdīd” (1025), tr. Validi, A. Zeki, “Die Nordvölker bei Biruni”, ZDMG, 90, 1, 1936, 50Google Scholar; al-Marvazī (1120), ed. Minorsky, V., Sharaf al-Zamān Ṭahir Marvazī on China, the Turks and India, London, 1942, Arabic text pp. 44–5Google Scholar (= § 3; Eng. trans, p. 34); al-Gharnāṭī (ca. 1131–1150), (a) “Tuḥfat al-albāb”, ed. Ferrand, G., Journal Asiatique, 207, part 2, 1925, 118, 238Google Scholar; (b) “Mu'rib 'an ba'd 'ajā'ib al-Maghrib”, ed. Dubler, César E., Abū Ḥāmidel Granadino y su relation de viaje por tierras eurasiáticas, Madrid, 1953, Arabic text pp. 13 (§ 12), 14–15 (§14), 18–19 (§§17–18)Google Scholar.

13 On Věś see Povest′ vremennykh let, ed. Likhachov, D. S., Vol. I, Moscow-Leningrad, 1950, 10, 13, 18Google Scholar.

14 Al-Gharnāṭī, , “Mu'rib”, ed. Dubler, , 13 (§ 12)Google Scholar.

15 On *Ar- see Ar′skaya zemlya, in Moskovskii letopisnyi svod kontsa XV veka, ed. Tikhomirov, M. N. = Polnoe Sobranie Russkikh Letopisei [= PSRL], Vol. 25, Moscow-Leningrad, 1949, s.a. 1379 [= p. 201]Google Scholar further data can be found in PSRL, Vol. 29, Moscow, 1965, Index, s.v. (p. 371)Google Scholar; (Aryane), in different annals starting with the year 1489, e.g. PSRL, Vol. 27, Moscow-Leningrad, 1962, 288–9Google Scholar. For further data on Apяhae, Apьckaя 3emля, Apckiй гopoДok, Apckoe пoлe, Apckiя bopota lsqb;in Kasan] see Adrianov, A. S., Ukazatel′ k pervym os′mi tomam PSRL: Otděl vtorol. Ukazatel′ geograficheskii (SPb. 1907), s.v. (pp. 4–5)Google Scholar. Cf. also Hrbek, Ivan, “Arabico-Slavica”, Archiv Orientálni, 23, 1955, 116–119Google Scholar.

16 On ywr' see al-Bīrūnī, , “Taḥdīd” (in ZDMG, 90, 1, 50Google Scholar); al-Marvazī, ed. Minorsky, Arabic text pp. 44–5 (, ywrh; Eng. trans. 34 and Minorsky's commentary, pp. 112–116); al-Gharnāṭī, , “Tuḥfat”, ed. Ferrand, , 238–9Google Scholar; “Mu'rib”, ed. Dubler, , 14–16 (§ 14–15), 18–21 (§ 17–19)Google Scholar.

17 On Юrpa/Yrpa (y)ugra see Povest′ vremennykh let, ed. Likhachov, , Vol. 1, 10 (yrpa), 167Google Scholar (юrpa, s.a. 1096), 197 (icrpa, s.a. 1114) and Novgorodskaya pervaya letopis', ed. Nasonov, A. N., Moscow-Leningrad, 1950, 38, 40, 41, 97, 99 (юrpa)Google Scholar.

18 On “Biarmia” see Tallgren, M. A., “Biarmia”, in Eurasia Septentrionalis Antiqua, Vol. 6, Helsinki, 1930, 100–120Google Scholar.

19 See Hrbek, I., Archiv Orientálni, 25, 629Google Scholar.

20 ibid., 648–9.

21 ed. Iraj Afshar, Teheran, 1961, 182.

22 “Mu'rib”, ed. Dubler, , 13Google Scholar (§ 12). cf. nn. 12, 13, 15.

23 ed. Kokovtsov, P. K., Evreisko-khazarskaya perepiska v X veke, Leningrad, 1932, 31, 1. 12Google Scholar.

24 See Yanin, V. L., Denezhno-vesovye sistemy russkogo srednevekov'ya. Domongol' skii period, Moscow, 1956, maps on pp. 86 and 102Google Scholar.

25 See n. 15, and Ocherki istorii SSSR. Period feodalizma IX–XV vv., Vol. 2, Moscow, 1953, 436–7Google Scholar.