Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:28:13.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strange Voices: Subjectivity and Gender in Forbidden Planet’s Soundscape of Tomorrow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2014

STEPHAN PROCK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the first Hollywood film to employ an all-electronic score, Forbidden Planet (1956) helped cement the association of science-fiction films with electronically produced sounds and music. While sounds lacking real-world referents were crucial for representing sonically the nature of fantastic objects and beings, Louis and Bebe Barron's soundscape also had to serve the more conventional musical demands of narrative cinema where music sets mood and atmosphere and creates the illusion of character subjectivity. This double function of their “electronic tonalities,” however, engendered a strange ambiguity in the film's sonic ontology. In this article, I examine how the practical and aesthetic issues arising from this ambiguity forced the Barrons to confront in their score a complex of intertwined musical and cultural messages: how electronic music evokes notions of the exotic Other; how conceptions of vocality and embodiment in their music intersect with other visual and narrative elements to illuminate a gendered divide among envoiced bodies in the film; and how music in the film evolves to illustrate and posit a threat to the male body and, thus, masculinity itself—only in order, ultimately, to restore and reassert conventional patriarchy and the primacy of male subjectivity. As I argue, by using modernist methods and materials to serve a conventionally populist representational form, the Barrons effectively exposed some of the deep underlying tensions and contradictions within modernism itself, even while revisioning fundamental aspects of the Hollywood film score.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Society for American Music , Volume 8 , Special Issue 3: Music and Sound in American Cinema, 1927–56 , August 2014 , pp. 371 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Music 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks go to those who over a number of years and in various contexts (conferences, colloquia) have provided invaluable feedback on this topic, including Mitchell Morris, Neil Lerner and Linda Dusman. More recently, returning to this essay after a number of years, I would like to thank Holly Watkins for casting a critical eye over a late version of the manuscript. Thanks are also due to the anonymous readers whose comments and suggestions helped me avoid a number of potential pitfalls and to JSAM editor Mark Katz and assistant editor Will Robin, along with Sally Bick, for their carefully detailed editing. Finally, and most of all, my gratitude to Elizabeth Hudson whose fountain of ideas and encouragement kept me continually refreshed.

References

Adorno, Theodor W. and Eisler, Hanns. Composing for the Films. London: Continuum: 2007.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. and Horkheimer, Max. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. John Cumming. London: Blackwell Verso, 1997.Google Scholar
Albright, Daniel. Modernism and Music: An Anthology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Auner, Joseph. “Schoenberg and His Public in 1930: The Six Pieces for Male Chorus, Op. 35.” In Schoenberg and His World, ed. Frisch, Walter, 85–125. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Babbitt, Milton. “Who Cares If You Listen.” High Fidelity, VIII/2 (February 1958): 38–40 and 126–27; repr. Contemporary Composers on Contemporary Music: Expanded Edition, ed. Schwartz, Elliot and Fox, Barney Childs with Jim, 244–50. New York: Da Capo Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Barron, Louis, and Bebe. “Forbidden Planet.” Film Music 15/5 (1956): 18.Google Scholar
Booker, M. Keith. From Box Office to Ballot Box: The American Political Film. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2007.Google Scholar
Born, Georgina, and Hesmondhalgh, David, eds. Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brockman, Jane. “The First Electronic Filmscore: Forbidden Planet.” The Score 7/3 (Fall/Winter 1992): 5–13.Google Scholar
Burman, Mark. “Making Music for Forbidden Planet.” In Film-Makers on Film-Making. Projections 7, ed. Boorman, John and Donohue, Walter, 252–63. London: Faber and Faber, 1997.Google Scholar
Chion, Michel. Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen. Trans. Claudia Gorbman with a foreword by Walter Murch. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Chion, Michel. The Voice in Cinema. Ed. and trans. Gorbman, Claudia. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Crowther, Bosley. “Screen: Wonderful Trip in Space; Forbidden Planet is Out of This World.” New York Times, 4 May 1956.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
de Reydellet, Jean. “Pierre Schaeffer, 1910–1995: The Founder of ‘Musique Concrète.’” Computer Music Journal, 20/2 (Summer 1996): 10–11.Google Scholar
Emmerson, Simon, and Smalley, Denis. “Electro-acoustic music.” Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/subscriber/article/grove/music/08695Google Scholar
Franklin, Peter. “King Kong and Film on Music: Out of the Fog.” In Film Music: Critical Approaches, ed. Donnelly, K. J.. New York: Continuum, 2001.Google Scholar
Franklin, Peter. “Modernism, Deception and Musical Others: Los Angeles circa 1940.” In Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music, ed. Born, Georgina and Hesmondhalgh, David, 143–162. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Gorbman, Claudia. Unheard Melodies: Narrative Film Music. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian. “Obituary: Delia Derbyshire.” The Guardian, 7 July 2001. http://www.theguardian.com/news/2001/jul/07/guardianobituaries1.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. The Sex Which is Not One, trans. Catherine Porter. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. Ann, ed. Feminism and Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. Ann. “Is The Gaze Male?” In Feminism and Film, ed. Kaplan, E. Ann, 119–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Knight, Arthur. “Crazy, Mixed-up Id.” The Saturday Review 34/14 (7 April 1956): 23–24.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Amy. Echo and Narcissus: Women's Voices in Classical Hollywood Cinema. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Leydon, Rebecca. “Forbidden Planet: Effects and Affects in the Electro Avant Garde.” In Off The Planet: Music, Sound and Science Fiction Cinema, ed. Hayward, Philip, 64–76. Eastleigh: John Libbey Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
London, Justin. “Leitmotifs and Music Reference in the Classical Film Score.” In Music and Cinema, ed. Buhler, James, Flinn, Caryl, Neumeyer, David, 85–96. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Malmgren, Carl D. “Self and Other in SF: Alien Encounters.” Science Fiction Studies 20/1 (1993): 15–33.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Susan. “Variations on the Dr. Who Theme.” The Scotsman, 25 September 2004. http://www.scotsman.com/news/variations-on-the-dr-who-theme-1-555717.Google Scholar
McCarten, John. “The Current Cinema: Big Brains in the Beyond.” New Yorker Magazine 32 (1956): 171–72.Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16/3 (1975): 6–18.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Victoria. “Science Fiction Films and Cold War Anxiety.” In Transforming the Screen, 1950–1959, ed. Lev, Peter, 169–196. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2003.Google Scholar
P.H. “Forbidden Planet.” Monthly Film Bulletin 23/264 (June 1956): 71–72.Google Scholar
Peary, Danny. Cult Movies: A Hundred Ways to Find the Reel Thing. London: Vermilion, 1982.Google Scholar
Poizat, Michel. The Angel's Cry: Beyond the Pleasure Principle in Opera. Trans. Arthur Denner. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Rubin, Steve. “Retrospect: Forbidden Planet.” Cinefantastique 4/1 (1975): 4–13.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. Style and Idea: Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg. Ed. Leonard Stein with translations by Leo Black. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kaja. The Acoustic Mirror: The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, Catherine Parsons. “‘A Distinguishing Virility’: Feminism and Modernism in American Art Music.” In Cecilia Reclaimed: Feminist Perspectives on Gender and Music, ed. Cook, Susan C. and Tsou, Judy S., 90–106. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Stilwell, Robynn J. “The Fantastical Gap Between Diegetic and Nondiegetic.” In Beyond the Soundtrack, ed. Goldmark, Daniel, Kramer, Lawrence and Leppert, Richard, 184–202. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Stone, Susan. “The Barrons: Forgotten Pioneers of Electronic Music,” National Public Radio broadcast, 7 February 2005.Google Scholar
Stravinsky, Igor. Igor Stravinsky: An Autobiography. New York: Norton & Norton, 1962.Google Scholar
Stravinsky, Igor, and Craft, Robert. Expositions and Developments. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Stuckenschmidt, H. H. Arnold Schoenberg: His Life, World and Work. Trans. Humphrey Searle. London: John Calder, 1977.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. Music in the Early Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Tick, Judith. “Charles Ives and Gender Ideology.” In Musicology and Difference: Gender and Sexuality in Music Scholarship, ed. Solie, Ruth A., 83–106. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Vale, V, and Juno, Andrea. Incredibly Strange Music: Volume II. San Francisco: RE/Search Publications, 1994.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert. Cybernetics; or, Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: J. Wiley, 1948.Google Scholar
Wierzbicki, James Eugene. Louis and Bebe Barron's Forbidden Planet: A Film Score Guide. Scarecrow Film Score Guides no. 4. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2005.Google Scholar