No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2019
1 See, for example, Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Burton, Antoinette, ed., After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and through the Nation (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Aronowitz, Stanley and Gautney, Heather, eds., Implicating Empire: Globalization and Resistance in the 21st Century World Order (New York: Basic Books, 2003)Google Scholar; Cooper, Frederick, Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005)Google Scholar; and Stoler, Anna Laura, McGranahan, Carole, and Perdue, Peter C., eds., Imperial Formations (Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, 2007)Google Scholar. For non–Western European empires, see, for example, Covey, R. Allan, How the Incas Built Their Heartland: State Formation and the Innovation of Imperial Strategies in the Sacred Valley, Peru (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Burbank, Jane and Cooper, Frederick, Empire in World History: Power and Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.
2 For a dense discussion on the topic, see Cook, Nicholas, “Theorizing Musical Meaning,” Music Theory Spectrum 23, no. 2 (Fall 2001): 170–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a topical study on popular music see Waterman, Christopher, “Big Man, Black President, Masked One: Models of the Celebrity Self in Yoruba Popular Music in Nigeria” in Playing with Identities in Contemporary Music in Africa, ed. Palberg, Mai and Kirkegaard, Annemette (Uppsala, Sweden: Nordiska Afrikainstituet, 2002), 19–22Google Scholar.
3 Burton, Antoinette, “Introduction,” in After the Imperial Turn Thinking with and through the Nation (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In addition, the idea of a historically fixed post-Enlightenment West assumes that conquest and colonialism on one end, and notions of human rights and citizenship on the other, are solely failings and privileges of Europeans; see, for example, Cooper, Colonialism in Question, 16. For a critique of the “neat fit between territory, language, and identity” postulated by the modernist project of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, see Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo and Qin-Hillard, Desiree, “Introduction,” in Globalization: Culture and Education in the New Millennium, ed. Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo and Qin-Hillard, Desiree (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), 3–4Google Scholar.
4 Wider, Gary, “Unthinking French History: Colonial Studies Beyond National Identity,” in After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and through the Nation, ed. Burton, Antoinette (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003), 105–6Google Scholar.
5 Jenkins, Henry, “Pop Cosmopolitanism: Mapping Cultural Flows in an Age of Media Convergence,” in Globalization: Culture and Education in the New Millennium, ed. Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo and Qin-Hillard, Desiree (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), 114–20Google Scholar.