Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:08:34.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Above-ground phytomass of a tropical deciduous forest on the coast of Jalisco, México

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Angelina Martinez-Yrizar ,
Jose Sarukhan ,
Alfredo Perez-Jimenez ,
Emmanuel Rincon ,
Jose Manuel Maass ,
Arturo Solis-Magallanes  and
Luis Cervantes
Angelina Martinez-Yrizar*
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70–275, C.P. 04510, México, D.F. México.
Jose Sarukhan
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70–275, C.P. 04510, México, D.F. México.
Alfredo Perez-Jimenez
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70–275, C.P. 04510, México, D.F. México.
Emmanuel Rincon
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70–275, C.P. 04510, México, D.F. México.
Jose Manuel Maass
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70–275, C.P. 04510, México, D.F. México.
Arturo Solis-Magallanes
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70–275, C.P. 04510, México, D.F. México.
Luis Cervantes
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70–275, C.P. 04510, México, D.F. México.
*
1Apdo. Postal 1354, C.P. 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phytomass was determined for a tropical deciduous forest in Chamela, Jalisco, México. The mean canopy height was 6.9 m, and the total basal area was 25.6 m2 ha−1 (dbh > 3.0 cm). The estimated phytomass for this forest (85 Mg ha−1) is among the highest values for tropical dry forests with similar seasonal climates. A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that phytomass can be predicted firstly by basal area (R2 = 0.88), then by wood specific gravity (R2 = 0.91), and finally by the inclusion of tree height in the regression (R2 = 0.92). Each new independent variable explained significant variance in the phytomass estimation.

Resumen

Se determinó la eantidad de fitomasa aerea viva de una selva baja caducifolia en Chamela, Jalisco, México. La altura promedio del dosel de vegetación fue de 6.9 m, y el área basal total de 25.6 m2 ha−1 (dbh > 3.0cm). La fitomasa estimada para el sitio de estudio (85 Mg ha−1) es de las más altas en comparación con otras selvas tropicales secas con climas similares. Un análisis de regresión múltiple mostró que la fitomasa se puede predceir en primer lugar como una función del área basal (R2 = 0.88), luego como función dc la gravedad especifica de la madera (R2 = 0.91) y finalmenle por la inclusión de la allura en la ecuación (R2 = 0.92). Cada nueva variable independiente explicó porciones significativas de la variancia en fitomasa.

Keywords

above-groundallometrybiomassMéxicophytomassseasonalityregressiontropical deciduous forest
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 87 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Attiwil, P. M. & Ovington, J. D. 1968. Determination of forest biomass. Forest Science 1:13–15.Google Scholar
Barajas-Morales, J. 1985. Wood structural differences between trees of two tropical forests in México. IAWA Bulletin 6:355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barajas-Morales, J. 1987. Wood specific gravity in species from two tropical forests in México. IAWA Bulletin 8:143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskerville, G. L. 1972. The use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2:49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. & Lugo, A. E. 1984. Biomass of tropical forests: a new estimate based on forest volumes. Science 223:1290–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullock, S. H. 1988. Rasgos del ambiente fisico y biológico de Chamela, Jalisco, México. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 77:5–17.Google Scholar
Bullock, S. H. & Solis-Magallanes, J. A. 1990. Phenology of canopy trees ofa tropical deciduous forest in México. Biotropica 21:22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos, J., Maass, M. & Kummerow, J. 1991. Root biomass of a tropical deciduous forest. Plant and Soil. 24:270–274.Google Scholar
Lambert, D. H., Arnason, J. T. & Gale, J. L. 1980. Leaf-litter and changing nutrient levels in a seasonally dry tropical hardwood forest, Belize, C. A. Plant and Soil 55:429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, E. J. 1985. Listados floríslicos de México. III. La Estación de Biología Chamela, Jalisco. Instituto de Biología, UNAM. México, D.F. 47 pp.Google Scholar
Lott, E. J., Bullock, S. H. & Solis-Magallanes, J. A. 1987. Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forests of coastal Jalisco. Biotropica 19:228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maass, J. M., Jordan, C. F. & Sarukhan, J. 1988. Soil erosion and nutrient losses in seasonal tropical agroecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology 25:595–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Yrizar, A. & Sarukhan, J. 1990. Litterfall patterns in a tropical deciduous forest in México over a five-year period. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, P. G. & Lugo, A. E. 1986a. Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17:67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, P. G. & Lugo, A. E. 1986b. Structure and biomass ofa subtropical dry forest in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 18:89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, H., Yoda, K., Ogino, K. & Kira, T. 1965. Comparative ecological studies on three main types of vegetation in Thailand. II. Plant Biomass. Nature Life Southeast Asia 4:49–81.Google Scholar
Rzedowski, J. 1978. Vegetación de México. Limusa, México, D.F.431 pp.Google Scholar
Singh, K. P. 1989. Mineral nutrients in tropical dry deciduous forest and savanna ecosystems in India. Pp. 153–158 in Proctor, J. (ed). Mineral nutrients in tropical forest and savanna ecosystems. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vyas, L. N., Garg, R. K. & Vyas, N. L. 1977. Stand structure and above ground biomass in dry deciduous forests of Aravalli Hills at Udaipur (Rajasthan), India. Biologia (Bratislava) 32:465–270.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. & Marks, P. L. 1975. Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. Pp. 55–118 in Lieth, H. & Whittaker, R. H. (eds). Productivity of the Biosphere. Springer-Verlag, New York. 339 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar