Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:17:45.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contrasting foraging patterns for Africanized honeybees, native bees and native wasps in a tropical agroforestry landscape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

Shalene Jha  and
John H. Vandermeer
Shalene Jha*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University, Ann Arbor MI 48109, USA
John H. Vandermeer
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University, Ann Arbor MI 48109, USA
*
1Corresponding author. Email: sjha@umich.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Ecological and temporal factors can influence animal foraging patterns and may obscure our understanding of how native and exotic species interact. To understand how such factors affect foraging, the visitation of native and exotic bees and wasps was observed at nectar feeders within Mexican agroforestry systems, while documenting (1) vegetation management (low-shade vs. high-shade coffee), (2) light and floral resource levels and (3) recruiting ability, as measured by the change in visitation between two consecutive experimental days. On day one, Africanized honeybee visitation was significantly greater in low-shade habitats, and native solitary bee abundance was significantly greater in high-shade habitats, while native social bee and solitary wasp visitation were not significantly different between habitat types. After 24 h, Africanized honeybee visitation increased significantly in both habitat types, while native social bee visitation increased significantly only in high-shade coffee. In contrast, native solitary bee and native solitary wasp visitation decreased in both habitat types. Overall, this study reveals that Africanized honeybees exhibit only initial foraging preference for low-shade habitats, while native bees exhibit both initial and delayed recruitment-based foraging preferences for high-shade habitats.

Keywords

concentrationdilutionMexicoresourceshade coffee
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 13 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ACKERMAN, J. D. 1983. Diversity and seasonality of male euglossine bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in central Panama. Ecology 64:274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AIZEN, M. A. & FEINSINGER, P. 1994. Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honeybees in Argentine chaco serrano. Ecological Applications 4:378–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROSI, B. J., DAILY, G. C. & EHRLICH, P. R. 2007. Bee community shifts with landscape context in a tropical countryside. Ecological Applications 17:418–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BULLOCK, S. H. & SOLIS-MAGALLANES, J. A. 1990. Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 22:22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUTZ-HURYN, V. 1997. Ecological impacts of introduced honey bees. Quarterly Review of Biology 72:275–297.Google Scholar
CAIRNS, C. E., VILLANUEVA-GUTIERREZ, R., KOPTUR, S. & BRAY, D. B. 2005. Bee populations, forest disturbance, and africanization in Mexico. Biotropica 37:686–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLAVERO, M. & GARCIA-BERTHOU, E. 2005. Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CROAT, T. C. 1978. The flora of Barro Colorado Island. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto. 943 pp.Google Scholar
DONALD, P. F. 2004. Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Conservation Biology 18:17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DORNHAUS, A. & CHITTKA, L. 1999. Insect behaviour – evolutionary origins of bee dances. Nature 401:38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DORNHAUS, A. & CHITTKA, L. 2004. Why do honey bees dance? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EVANS, H. E. & WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. 1970. The wasps. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 265 pp.Google Scholar
FARAWAY, J. 2005. Extending the linear model with R: Generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. 312 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOSTER, R. B. 1982. The seasonal rhythm of fruitfall on Barro Colorado Island. Pp. 151–172 in Leigh, E. G., Rand, A. S. & Windsor, D. M. (eds.). Ecology of a tropical forest: seasonal rhythms and long-term changes. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
FREE, J. B. & WILLIAMS, I. H. 1983. Scent-marking of flowers by honeybees. Journal of Apicultural Research 22:86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOULSON, D. 2003. Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HINGSTON, A. B. 1998. Temporal and spatial variation in abundances of native bee species on an altitudinal gradient in southern Tasmania. Australian Journal of Zoology 46:497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUBBELL, S. P. & JOHNSON, L. K. 1978. Comparative foraging behavior of six stingless bee species exploiting a standardized resource. Ecology 59:1123–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHNSON, L. K. & HUBBELL, S. P. 1974. Aggression and competition among stingless bees – field studies. Ecology 55:120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KERR, W. E. 1967. The history of the introduction of African bees to Brazil. South African Bee Journal 39:3–5.Google Scholar
KERR, W. E., DELRIO, S. D. & BARRIONUEVO, M. D. 1982. The southern limits of the distribution of the Africanized honey bee in South America. American Bee Journal 122:196–198.Google Scholar
KIM, J., WILLIAMS, N. & KREMEN, C. 2006. Effects of cultivation and proximity to natural habitat on ground-nesting native bees in California sunflower fields. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 79:309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLEIN, A. M., STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I. & TSCHARNTKE, T. 2003a. Bee pollination and fruit set of Coffea arabica and C. canephora (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 90:153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLEIN, A. M., STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I. & TSCHARNTKE, T. 2003b. Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:837–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLEIN, A. M., STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I. & TSCHARNTKE, T. 2004. Foraging trip duration and density of megachilid bees, eumenid wasps and pompilid wasps in tropical agroforestry systems. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLEIN, A. M., STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I. & TSCHARNTKE, T. 2006. Rain forest promotes trophic interactions and diversity of trap-nesting hymenoptera in adjacent agroforestry. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:315–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KLEIN, A. M., VAISSIERE, B. E., CANE, J. H., STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I., CUNNINGHAM, S. A., KREMEN, C. & TSCHARNTKE, T. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 274:303–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KLEIN, A. M., CUNNINGHAM, S. A., BOS, M. & STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I. 2008. Advances in pollination ecology from tropical plantation crops. Ecology 89:935–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KREMEN, C., WILLIAMS, N. M. & THORP, R. W. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:16812–16816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KREMEN, C., WILLIAMS, N. M., BUGG, R. L., FAY, J. P. & THORP, R. W. 2004. The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecology Letters 7:1109–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KREMEN, C., WILLIAMS, N. M., AIZEN, M. A., GEMMILL-HERREN, B., LEBUHN, G., MINCKLEY, R., PACKER, L., POTTS, S. G., ROULSTON, T., STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I., VAZQUEZ, D. P., WINFREE, R., ADAMS, L., CRONE, E. E., GREENLEAF, S. S., KEITT, T. H., KLEIN, A. M., REGETZ, J. & RICKETTS, T. H. 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters 10:299–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LINDAUER, M. 1971. Communication among social bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 161 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MICHENER, C. D. 1979. Biogeography of the bees. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66:277–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MICHENER, C. D. 2000. Bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 953 pp.Google Scholar
MOGUEL, P. & TOLEDO, V. M. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conservation Biology 13:11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAGAMITSU, T. & INOUE, T. 1997. Aggressive foraging of social bees as a mechanism of floral resource partitioning in an Asian tropical rainforest. Oecologia 110:432–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIEH, J. C. 2004. Recruitment communication in stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini). Apidologie 35:159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PERFECTO, I., RICE, R. A., GREENBERG, R. & VANDERVOORT, M. E. 1996. Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46:598–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POTTS, S. G., VULLIAMY, B., ROBERTS, S., O'TOOLE, C., DAFNI, A., NE'EMAN, G. & WILLMER, P. 2005. Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecological Entomology 30:78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAINE, N. E., INGS, T. C., DORNHAUS, A., SALEFL, N. & CHITTKA, L. 2006. Adaptation, genetic drift, pleiotropy, and history in the evolution of bee foraging behavior. Advances in the Study of Behavior 36:305–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICHTER, M. R. 1990. Hunting social wasp interactions – influence of prey size, arrival order, and wasp species. Ecology 71:1018–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICHTER, M. R. 2000. Social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) foraging behavior. Annual Review of Entomology 45:121–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RICHTER, M. R. & TISCH, V. L. 1999. Resource choice of social wasps: influence of presence, size and species of resident wasps. Insectes Sociaux 46:131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICKETTS, T. H. 2004. Tropical forest fragments enhance pollinator activity in nearby coffee crops. Conservation Biology 18:1262–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RINCON, M., ROUBIK, D. W., FINEGAN, B., DELGADO, D. & ZAMORA, N. 1999. Understory bees and floral resources in logged and silviculturally treated Costa Rican rainforest plots. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 72:379–393.Google Scholar
ROSS, K. & MATTHEWS, R. 1991. The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 678 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROUBIK, D. 1986. Sporadic food competition with the African honey bee: projected impact on neotropical social bees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2:97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROUBIK, D. 1991. Aspects of Africanized honey bee ecology in tropical America. Pp. 259–281 in Spivak, M., Fletcher, D. J. C. & Breed, M. D. B. (eds.). The “African” honey bee. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
ROUBIK, D. W. 1978. Competitive interactions between neotropical pollinators and Africanized honey bees. Science 201:1030–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ROUBIK, D. W. 1980. Foraging behavior of competing Africanized honeybees and stingless bees. Ecology 61:836–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROUBIK, D. W. 2002. Tropical agriculture – the value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature 417:708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROUBIK, D. W. & WOLDA, H. 2001. Do competing honey bees matter? Dynamics and abundance of native bees before and after honey bee invasion. Population Ecology 43:53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHAFFER, W. M., JENSEN, D. B., HOBBS, D. E., GUREVITCH, J., TODD, J. R. & SCHAFFER, M. V. 1979. Competition, foraging energetics, and the cost of sociality in three species of bees. Ecology 60:976–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHAFFER, W. M., ZEH, D. W., BUCHMANN, S. L., KLEINHANS, S., SCHAFFER, M. V. & ANTRIM, J. 1983. Competition for nectar between introduced honey bees and native North American bees and ants. Ecology 64:564–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHNEIDER, S. S., HOFFMAN, G. D. & SMITH, D. R. 2004. The African honey bee: factors contributing to a successful biological invasion. Annual Review of Entomology 49:351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SLAA, E. J. 2003. Foraging ecology of stingless bees: from individual behaviour to community ecology. Utrecht University, Department of Behavioural Biology, Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
SPIVAK, M., FLETCHER, D. J. C. & BREED, M. C. (eds.) 1991. The “African” honey bee. Westview Press, Boulder. 435 pp.Google Scholar
STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I., MUNZENBERG, U., BURGER, C., THIES, C. & TSCHARNTKE, T. 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STEIN, B., KUTNER, L. & ADAMS, J. 2000. Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York. 416 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STONE, G. N. 1994. Activity patterns of females of the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes in relation to temperature, nectar supplies and body-size. Ecological Entomology 19:177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TEPEDINO, V. J. & STANTON, N. L. 1981. Diversity and competition in bee-plant communities on short-grass prairie. Oikos 36:35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THOMSON, D. 2004. Competitive interactions between the invasive European honey bee and native bumble bees. Ecology 85:458–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THOMSON, D. M. 2006. Detecting the effects of introduced species: a case study of competition between Apis and Bombus. Oikos 114:407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THORP, R. 1987. World overview of the interactions between honeybees and other flora and fauna. Pp. 40–47 in Blyth, J. (ed.). Beekeeping and land management. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth.Google Scholar
VITOUSEK, P. M., DANTONIO, C. M., LOOPE, L. L. & WESTBROOKS, R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84:468–478.Google Scholar
VON FRISCH, K., WENNER, A. M. & JOHNSON, D. L. 1967. Honeybees – do they use direction and distance information provided by their dancers. Science 158:1072–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILCOVE, D. S., ROTHSTEIN, D., DUBOW, J., PHILLIPS, A. & LOSOS, E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILLMER, P. G. & STONE, G. N. 2004. Behavioral, ecological, and physiological determinants of the activity patterns of bees. Advances in the Study of Behavior 34:347–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOLDA, H. & ROUBIK, D. W. 1986. Nocturnal bee abundance and seasonal bee activity in a Panamanian forest. Ecology 67:426–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar