Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:19:07.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are interspecific associations of primates in the Western Ghats a matter of chance? A case study of the lion-tailed macaque

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2015

Joseph J. Erinjery ,
Honnavalli N. Kumara ,
T. S. Kavana  and
Mewa Singh
Joseph J. Erinjery
Affiliation:
Biopsychology Laboratory and Institute of Excellence, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, India
Honnavalli N. Kumara
Affiliation:
Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore 641 108, India
T. S. Kavana
Affiliation:
Biopsychology Laboratory and Institute of Excellence, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, India
Mewa Singh*
Affiliation:
Biopsychology Laboratory and Institute of Excellence, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, India Evolutionary & Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560 064, India National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore, India
*
1Corresponding author. Email: mewasinghltm@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

When animals or groups of animals in their wild habitats come close to each other within a defined distance, it is termed as an association. Observing two groups of the lion-tailed macaque at Nelliyampathy and Andiparai forests of the Western Ghats of India, we asked whether the lion-tailed macaque associations with the sympatric Nilgiri langur and bonnet macaque were by chance or had any biological significance. Employing ‘all occurrences’ sampling, we recorded an association if a group of another primate species came within 30 m of the focal group of the lion-tailed macaque. Date, time, associating species, activity of the study species and of the associating species, type of interaction, aggressor and the recipient, species displaced and duration of the association were recorded. We used the Waser gas model to calculate the expected frequency and duration of associations and compared them with the observed associations. The lion-tailed macaque spent less time in associations than expected. The lion-tailed macaque and the Nilgiri langur initiated associations less often, and remained in association for less time, than expected by chance. Whereas the expected and observed initiation of associations between the lion-tailed macaque and the Nilgiri langur in Nelliyampathy was significantly different (expected rate = 153; observed rate = 64), in Andiparai, it was not (expected rate = 55.5; observed rate = 61). The expected and observed association duration was significantly different in Nelliyampathy (expected duration = 54 min; observed duration = 15 min) and Andiparai (expected duration = 48 min; observed duration = 19 min). In contrast, we detected few differences between observed and expected association frequency for the lion-tailed macaque and the bonnet macaque. Aggressive interactions were common in areas where density of the Nilgiri langur groups was high. This is the first study on Asian primates using the ideal gas approach to show that primates do not form active associations with each other.

Keywords

bonnet macaquecommunity ecologyhabitat fragmentationMacaca radiataNilgiri langurSemnopithecus johniiWestern Ghats
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 41 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BEAUDROT, L. H. & MARSHALL, A. J. 2011. Primate communities are structured more by dispersal limitation than by niches. Journal of Animal Ecology 80:332–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BEAUDROT, L., STRUEBIG, M. J., MEIJAARD, E., VAN BALEN, S., HUSSON, S., YOUNG, C. F. & MARSHALL, A. J. 2013. Interspecific interactions between primates, birds, bats, and squirrels may affect community composition on Borneo. American Journal of Primatology 75:170–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRONSTEIN, J. L. 1994. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:214–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRYER, M. A., CHAPMAN, C. A. & ROTHMAN, J. M. 2013. Diet and polyspecific associations affect spatial patterns among redtail monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius). Behaviour 150:277–293.Google Scholar
BUZZARD, P. J. 2010. Polyspecific associations of Cercopithecus campbelli and C. petaurista with C. diana: what are the costs and benefits? Primates 51:307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHAPMAN, C. A. & CHAPMAN, L. J. 1996. Mixed-species primate groups in the Kibale Forest: ecological constraints on association. International Journal of Primatology 17:31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHAPMAN, C. A. & CHAPMAN, L. J. 2000. Interdemic variation in mixed-species association patterns: common diurnal primates of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 47:129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CORDS, M. 1987. Mixed-species association of Cercopithecus monkeys in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. University of California Publications in Zoology 117:1–109.Google Scholar
CORDS, M. 1990. Mixed-species association of East African guenons: general patterns or specific examples? American Journal of Primatology 21:101–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DINERSTEIN, E. 1979. An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali-Bardia wildlife reserve, Nepal. Part II: habitat/animal interactions. Biological Conservation 16:265–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ERINJERY, J. J., KAVANA, T. S. & SINGH, M. 2015. Food resources, distribution and seasonal variations in ranging in lion-tailed macaques, Macaca silenus in the Western Ghats, India. Primates 56:45–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FRENCH, A. R. & SMITH, T. B. 2005. Importance of body size in determining dominance hierarchies among diverse tropical frugivores. Biotropica 37:96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAUGAASEN, T. & PERES, C. A. 2008. Associations between primates and other mammals in a central Amazonian forest landscape. Primates 49:219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAUGAASEN, T. & PERES, C. A. 2009. Interspecific primate associations in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. Primates 50:239–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HOLENWEG, A. K., NOË, R. & SCHABEL, M. 1996. Waser's gas model applied to associations between red colobus and Diana monkeys in the Taï National Park, Ivory Coast. Folia Primatologica 67:125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUTCHINSON, J. & WASER, P. M. 2007. Use, misuse and extensions of “ideal gas” models of animal encounter. Biological Reviews 82:335–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KAMILAR, J. M. 2009. Environmental and geographic correlates of the taxonomic structure of primate communities. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 139:382–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KING, A. J. & COWLISHAW, G. 2009. Foraging opportunities drive interspecific associations between rock kestrels and desert baboons. Journal of Zoology 277:111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KUMAR, A. 1987. The ecology and population dynamics of the lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) in South India (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
KUMARA, H. N., SASI, R., SUGANTHASAKTHIVEL, R., SINGH, M., SUSHMA, H. S., RAMACHANDRAN, K. K. & KAUMANNS, W. 2014. Distribution, demography, and conservation of lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) in the Anamalai Hills Landscape, Western Ghats, India. International Journal of Primatology 35:976–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W., LAURANCE, S. G. & HILBERT, D. H. 2008. Long-term dynamics of a fragmented rainforest mammal assemblage. Conservation Biology 22:1154–1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LEHNER, P. N. 1998. Handbook of ethological methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 694 pp.Google Scholar
MOLUR, S., BRANDON-JONES, D., DITTUS, W., EUDEY, A., KUMAR, A., SINGH, M., FEEROZ, M. M., CHALISE, M., PRIYA, P. & FEEROZ, S.E. 2003. Status of south Asian primates: Conservation assessment and management plan (C.A.M.P.) Workshop Report, 2003. Zoo Outreach Organisation/CBSG–South Asia, Coimbatore.Google Scholar
OATES, J. F., WATERMAN, P. G. & CHOO, G. M. 1980. Food selection by the south Indian leaf-monkey, Presbytis johnii, in relation to leaf chemistry. Oecologia 45:45–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PERES, C. A. 1992. Prey-capture benefits in a mixed-species group of Amazonian tamarins, Saguinus fuscicollis and S. mystax. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31:339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RANGEL-NEGRÍN, A., COYOHUA-FUENTES, A., CANALES-ESPINOSA, D. & DIAS, P. A. D. 2014. Mammal assemblages in forest fragments and landscapes occupied by black howler monkeys. Primates 55:345–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RODMAN, P. S. 1973. Synecology of Bornean primates. I. A test for interspecific interactions in spatial distribution of five species. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 38:655–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSE, L. M., PERRY, S., PANGER, M. A., JACK, K., MANSON, J. H., GROS-LOUIS, J. & VOGEL, E. 2003. Interspecific interactions between Cebus capucinus and other species at three Costa Rican sites. International Journal of Primatology 24:759–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROWE, N. 1996. The pictorial guide to the living primates. Pogonias Press, New York. 263 pp.Google Scholar
SINGH, M., KUMARA, H. N., KUMAR, M. A. & SHARMA, A. K. 2001. Behavioural responses of lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) to a changing habitat in a tropical rain forest fragment in the Western Ghats, India. Folia Primatologica 72:278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SINGH, M., SINGH, M., KUMAR, M. A., KUMARA, H. N., SHARMA, A. K. & KAUMANNS, W. 2002. Distribution, population structure, and conservation of lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) in the Anaimalai Hills, Western Ghats, India. American Journal of Primatology 57:91–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SINGH, M., ROY, K. & SINGH, M. 2011. Resource partitioning in sympatric langurs and macaques in tropical rainforests of the central Western Ghats, South India. American Journal of Primatology 73:335–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SINGH, M. E., SINGH, M. R., KUMARA, H. N., KUMAR, M. A. & D’SOUZA, L. 1997. Inter-and intra-specific associations of non-human primates in Anaimalai Hills, South India. Mammalia 61:17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SINGH, M. R., SINGH, M., ANANADA KUMAR, M., KUMAR, H. N., SHARMA, A. K. & SUSHMA, H. S. 2000. Niche separation in sympatric lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) and Nilgiri langur (Presbytis johnii) in an Indian tropical rain forest. Primate Report 58:83–95.Google Scholar
STENSLAND, E., ANGERBJÖRN, A. & BERGGREN, P. 2003. Mixed species groups in mammals. Mammal Review 33:205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STRUHSAKER, T. T. 1981. Polyspecific associations among tropical rain-forest primates. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 57:268–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SUSHMA, H. S. 2004. Resource utilization and niche separation in sympatric rainforest arboreal mammals. Doctoral dissertation, University of Mysore, Mysore.Google Scholar
SUSHMA, H. S. & SINGH, M. 2006. Resource partitioning and interspecific interactions among sympatric rainforest arboreal mammals of the Western Ghats, India. Behavioral Ecology 17:479–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TSUJINO, R. & YUMOTO, T. 2014. Species interactions and the roles of primates in the ecosystem. Primate Research 30:79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UMAPATHY, G., HUSSAIN, S. & SHIVAJI, S. 2011. Impact of habitat fragmentation on the demography of lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) populations in the rainforests of Anamalai Hills, Western Ghats, India. International Journal of Primatology 32:889–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WASER, P. M. 1982. Primate polyspecific associations: do they occur by chance? Animal Behaviour 30:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WASER, P. M. 1984. “Chance” and mixed-species associations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15:197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WASER, P. M. 1987. Interactions among primate species. Pp. 210–226 in Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W. & Struhsaker, T. T (eds.). Primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
WHITESIDES, G. H. 1989. Interspecific associations of Diana monkeys, Cercopithecus diana, in Sierra Leone, West Africa: biological significance or chance? Animal Behaviour 37:760–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar