Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:18:46.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breakdown of Ficus fistulosa (Moraceae) leaves in Hong Kong, with special reference to dynamics of elements and the effects of invertebrate consumers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Paul K. S. Lam  and
David Dudgeon
Paul K. S. Lam
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
David Dudgeon
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seasonal variations in the breakdown and dynamics of chemical elements in Ficus fistulosa leaves in a mixed forest on Hong Kong Island were investigated between October 1982 and September 1983. Mean rate of leaf material weight loss from coarse-mesh (3 mm) bags was 1.82% day-1, about four times that inside fine-mesh (0.2 mm) bags (mean rate 0.44% day-1). Breakdown rates varied seasonally with maximum rates in spring or summer, and were significantly correlated with prevailing temperatures, the rainfall of the two previous months, and the soil moisture content of the previous month. Potassium and Mg were rapidly leached from leaf material throughout the year while the concentrations of C, N, P, Ca and Na remained relatively stable. In the absence of macrofauna (inside fine-mesh bags) decomposition rate constants (k) were positively correlated with the mean abundance of mites and Collembola, as well as with total invertebrate abundance. In the presence of macrofauna (inside coarse-mesh bags) decomposition rate constants were positively correlated with isopod and amphipod abundance. There was no significant correlation between breakdown rates of leaf material and mesofaunal abundance inside coarse-mesh bags. The importance of climate and invertebrates as rate determinants of Ficus decomposition is discussed.

Keywords

climatic controldynamics of elementsFicus fistulosaHong Konginvertebrate consumersleaf breakdown rates
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , August 1985 , pp. 249 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Allen, S. E., Grimshaw, H. M., Parkinson, J. A & Quarmby, C. 1974. Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell, Oxford. 565 pp.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. 1973. The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and beech (Faqus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils. I. Breakdown, leaching and decomposition. Oecologia 12:251–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. M.Proctor, J. & Vallack, H. W. 1983. Ecological studies in four contrasting low-land rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. III. Decomposition processes and nutrient losses from leaf litter. Journal of Ecology 71:503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Swift, M. J. 1983. Decomposition in tropical forests. Pp. 287–309 in Sutton, S. L., Whitmore, T. C. & Chadwick, A. C. (eds). Tropical rain forest: ecology and management Special Publication Series of the British Ecological Society, No. 2. Blackwell, Oxford. 498 pp.Google Scholar
Attiwill, P. M. 1968. The loss of elements from decomposing litter. Ecology 49:142–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidwell, R. G. S. 1979. Plant physiology. (2nd edition.) Macmillan, New York. 643 pp.Google Scholar
Birch, H. F. 1961. Phosphorus transformations during plant decomposition. Plant and Soil 15:347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breymeyer, A & Brzozowska, D. 1970. Density, activity and consumption of Isopoda on a Stellario-Deschampsietum meadow. Pp. 225–230 in Phillipson, J. (ed.). Methods of study in soilecology. Proceedings of the Paris Symposium. UNESCO, Paris. 303 pp.Google Scholar
Burges, A. 1967. The decomposition of organic matter in the soil. Pp. 479–492 in Burges, A. & Raw, F. (eds). Soilbiology. Academic Press, London. 532 pp.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. 1982. Comparisons of equations for decay of leaf litter in tree-hole ecosystems. Oikos 39:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. A., Reichle, D. E. & Crossley, D. A. Jr 1970. The role of soil invertebrates in turnover of organic matter and nutrients. Pp. 147–172 in Reichle, D. E. (ed.). Analysis of temperate forest ecosystems. Ecological Studies 1. Chapman & Hall, London. 304 pp.Google Scholar
Falconer, J. G., Wright, J. W. & Beall, H. W. 1933. The decomposition of certain types of forest litter under field conditions. American Journal of Botany 20:196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosz, J. R., Likens, G. E. & Bormann, F. H. 1973. Nutrient release from decomposing leaf and branch litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. Ecological Monographs 43:173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, P. J. A. & Howard, D. M. 1974. Microbial decomposition of tree and shrub leaf litter. 1. Weight loss and chemical composition of decomposing litter. Oikos 25:341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, H., Gessel, S. P. & Bingham, F. T. 1949. Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Science 68:419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klekowski, R. Z. & Duncan, A. 1975. Review of methods for identification of food and for measurement of consumption and assimilation rates. Pp. 227–261 in Grodzinski, W., Klekowski, R. Z. & Duncan, A. (eds). Methods for ecological bioenergetics. IBP Handbook No. 24. Blackwell, Oxford. 367 pp.Google Scholar
Lam, P. K. S. & Dudgeon, D. 1985. Seasonal effects on litterfall in a Hong Kong mixed forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 1:55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lousier, J. D. & Parkinson, D. 1976. Litter decomposition in a cool temperate deciduous forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 54:419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. R. 1984. Litter decomposition in a subarctic spruce-lichen woodland, eastern Canada. Ecology 65:299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, L. A. & Macauley, B. J. 1982. Eucalyptus leaf-litter decomposition: effects of relative humidity and substrate moisture content. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 14:233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J. S. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. L. & Rolfe, G. L. 1982. Nutrient dynamics and decomposition of litterfall in flood-plain and upland forests of central Illinois. Forest Science 28:667–681.Google Scholar
Rushton, S. P. & Hassall, M. 1983. Food and feeding rates of the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille). Oecologia 57:415–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seastedt, T. R., Crossley, D. A. Jr, Meentemeyer, V. & Waide, J. B. 1983. A two-year study of leaf litter decomposition as related to macroclimatic factors and microarthropod abundance in the southern Appalachians. Holarctic Ecology 6:11–16.Google Scholar
Singh, J. S. & Gupta, S. R. 1977. Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems. Botanical Review 43:449–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1978. Ecological methods, with particular reference to the study of insect populations. (2nd edition.) Chapman & Hall. 524 pp.Google Scholar
Stark, N. 1972. Nutrient cycling pathways and litter fungi. Bioscience 22:355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, E. V. J. 1981. The decomposition of leaf litter in Jamaican montane rain forests. Journal of Ecology 69:263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, H. B. 1970. The leaching of substances from plants. Annual Reivew of Plant Physiology 21: 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waksman, S. A. & Gerretsen, F. C. 1931. Influence of temperature and moisture upon the nature and extent of decomposition of plant residues by microorganisms. Ecology 12:33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, G. C. & Merriam, H. G. 1978. Litter decomposition in a red maple woodlot under natural conditions and under insecticide treatment. Ecology 59:180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieder, R. K., Carrel, J. E., Rapp, J. K. & Kucera, C. L. 1983. Decomposition of tall fescue (Festuca elatior var. arundinacea) and cellulose litter on surface mines and a tallgrass prairie in central Missouri, U.S.A. Journal of Applied Ecology 20:303–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieder, R. K. & Lang, G. E. 1982. A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63:1636–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegert, R. G. & Mcginnis, J. T. 1975. Annual production and disappearance of detritus on three South Carolina old fields. Ecology 56:129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, G. M. 1967. Decomposition of Pinus radiata litter on the forest floor. Part 1. Changes in dry matter and nutrient content. New Zealand Journal of Science 10:1030–1040.Google Scholar
Williams, S. T. & Gray, T. R. G. 1974. Decomposition of litter on the soil surface. Pp. 611–632 in Dickinson, C. H. & Pugh, G. J. F. (eds). Biology of plant litter decomposition. Volume 2. Academic Press, London. 245–775 pp.Google Scholar
Witkamp, M. 1969. Cycles of temperature and carbon dioxide evolution from litter and soil. Ecology 50: 922–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, P. V. & Raison, R. J. 1982. An appraisal of techniques for the study of litter decomposition in eucalypt forests. Australian Journal of Ecology 7:215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodwell, G. M. & Marples, T. G. 1968. The influence of chronic gamma irradiation on production and decay of litter and humus in an oak-pine forest. Ecology 49:456–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar