Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:14:53.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in seed rain during secondary succession in a tropical montane cloud forest region in Oaxaca, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

R. F. del Castillo  and
M. A. Pérez Ríos
R. F. del Castillo*
Affiliation:
CIIDIR-Oaxaca, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Hornos 1003, Xoxocotlan, Oaxaca 71230, México
M. A. Pérez Ríos
Affiliation:
CIIDIR-Oaxaca, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Hornos 1003, Xoxocotlan, Oaxaca 71230, México
*
1Corresponding author. Email: fsanchez@ipn.mx, rdelcast@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed dispersal is the first stage of colonization, and potentially affects recruitment. This process deserves more attention in tropical montane cloud forests (TMCF), since secondary succession is common owing to episodic disturbances. We studied annual seed rain in 10 nearby forest stands, ≈7 to ≈100 y following shifting agriculture, and one primary forest stand in southern Mexico to test the hypothesis that seed rain is limited at the scale of neighbouring fragments and that such limitation differs among species with different dispersal modes and successional origin. Annual seed rain was heterogeneous among forest fragments probably due to the prevalence of local seed dispersal, differences in stand age and the proportion of zoochory, and may help explain the patchy distribution of species observed in TMCF. Seed rain abundance and species diversity per unit trap area increased with the age of the stand. Biotically dispersed seeds increased towards older stands relative to abiotically dispersed seeds. Late-successional seeds were rarer in early successional stands than pioneer seeds in late-successional stands, suggesting that long-distance dispersal is generally more common for pioneer plants. Seed dispersal appears to constrain forest regeneration and to influence fragment species composition as a function of the distance from the source forests.

Keywords

dispersaldisturbancediversityfragmentationfrugivoryMexicomontane forestpioneerssecondary forestseed dispersal
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , July 2008 , pp. 433 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ACOSTA, C. A. 2004. Afinidades de la flora genérica de algunos bosques mesófilos de montaña del nordeste, dentro y sur de México: un enfoque fenético. Anales del Instituto de Biología de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Serie Botánica 73:61–72.Google Scholar
AGRESTI, A. 2002. Categorical data analysis. (Second edition). Wiley, New York. 460 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALDRICH, M. & HOSTETTLER, S. 2000. Tropical montane cloud forest, time for action. UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge. 98 pp.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS. 1999. Anuario Estadístico del Estado de Oaxaca. Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática, Aguascalientes, México. 150 pp.Google Scholar
BAUTISTA-CRUZ, M. A. & DEL CASTILLO, R. F. 2005. Soil changes during secondary succession in a tropical montane cloud forest area. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAUTISTA-CRUZ, M. A., GUTIÉRREZ, C., DEL CASTILLO, R. F. & ETCHEVERS, J. D. 2005. Cronosecuencia de un suelo y su clasificación en un área originalmente ocupada por bosque mesófilo de montaña. Terra Latinoamericana 23:147–158.Google Scholar
BLANCO-MACÍAS, M. 2001. Análisis sucesional del bosque mesófilo en El Rincón, Sierra Norte de Oaxaca. Professional Dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico. Iztacala, Estado de México. 60 pp.Google Scholar
BRUIJNZEEL, L. A. & PROCTOR, J. 1995. Hydrology and biogeochemistry of tropical montane cloud forest: what do we really know? Pp. 38–78 in Hamilton, L. S., Jurick, J. O. & Scatena, F. N. (eds.). Tropical montane forests. Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BULLOCK, J. M., MOY, I. L., PYWELL, R. E., COULSON, S. J., NOLAN, A. M. & CASWELL, H. 2002. Plant dispersal and colonization process at local and landscape scales. Pp. 279–302 in Bullock, J. M., Kenward, R. E. & Hails, R. S. (eds.). Dispersal ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
CARDOSO DA SILVA, J. M. & TABARELLI, M. 2000. Tree species impoverishment and the future flora of the Atlantic forest of northeast Brazil. Nature 404:72–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CAVELIER, J., SOLIS, D. & JARAMILLO, M. A. 1996. Fog interception in montane forest across the Central cordillera of Panamá. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12:357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAYUELA, L., REY BENAYAS, J. M., & ECHEVERRIA, C. 2006. Clearance and fragmentation of tropical montane forest in the highlands of Chiapas. Forest Ecology and Management 226:208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHURCHILL, S. P., BALSLEV, H., FORERO, E. & LUTEYN, J. L. 1995. Biodiversity and conservation of neotropical montane forest. The New York Botanical Garden, New York. 470 pp.Google Scholar
CORDOVA, J. & DEL CASTILLO, R. F. 2001. Changes in epiphyte cover in three chronosequences in a tropical montane cloud forest in Mexico. Pp. 79–94 in Gottsberger, G. & Liede, S. (eds.). Life forms and dynamics in tropical forests. Cramer, Berlin.Google Scholar
DEL CASTILLO, R. F. & BLANCO MACÍAS, A. 2007. Secondary succession under a slash-and-burn regime in a tropical montane cloud forest: soil and vegetation characteristics. Pp. 158–180 in Newton, A. C. (ed.). Biodiversity loss and conservation in fragmented forest landscapes. Evidence from the forests of montane Mexico and temperate South America. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
DUNCAN, R. S. & CHAPMAN, C. A. 1999. Seed dispersal and potential forest succession in abandoned agriculture in tropical Africa. Ecological Applications 9:998–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOSTER, B. L. & TILMAN, D. 2003. Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in an oak savanna grassland. Journal of Ecology 91:999–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRANADOS-SÁNCHEZ, D. 1994. Ecología y dispersión de las plantas. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Mexico. 111 pp.Google Scholar
GREENE, D. F. & JOHNSON, E. A. 1996. Wind dispersal of seeds from a forest into a clearing. Ecology 77:595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUARIGUATA, M. R. & OSTERTAG, R. 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 148:185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUNN, N. C. & RITCHIE, C. A. 1988. Identification of disseminules listed in the Federal Noxious Weed Act. Technical Bulletin N° 1719. Agricultural Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C. 350 pp.Google Scholar
HOLL, K. D. 1999. Factors limiting tropical rain forest regeneration in abandoned pasture: seed rain, seed germination, microclimate and soil. Biotropica 31:229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLL, K. D. 2002. Effects of shrubs on tree seedling establishment in an abandoned tropical pasture. Journal of Ecology 90:179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOWE, H. F. & SMALLWOOD, J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUBBELL, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 4387:1299–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INGLE, N. R. 2003. Seed dispersal by wind, birds, and bats between Philippine montane rainforest and successional vegetation. Oecologia 134:251–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LAWRENCE, D. 2004. Erosion of tree diversity during 200 years of shifting cultivation in a Bornean rain forest. Ecological Applications 14:1855–1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LENTZ, D. L. & DICKAU, R. 2005. Seeds of Central America and Southern Mexico. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, 296 pp.Google Scholar
MARTÍN, A. C. & BARKLEY, W. D. 1961. Seed identification manual. University of California Press, Berkeley. 221 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARTÍNEZ-GARZA, C. & GONZÁLEZ-MONTAGUT, R. 1999. Seed rain from forest fragments into tropical pastures in los Tuxtlas. Plant Ecology 145:255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MESQUITA, R. C. C., ICKES, K., GANADE, G. & WILLIAMSON, G. B. 2001. Alternative successional pathways in the Amazon Basin. Journal of Ecology 89:528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MUÑIZ-CASTRO, M. A., WILLIAMS-LINERA, G. & REY BENAYAS, J. M. 2006. Distance from clouds forest fragments on plant community structure in abandoned pastures in Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22:431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIEMBRO ROCAS, A. 1989. Semillas de plantas leñosas. Morfología comparada. Limusa, Mexico City. 224 pp.Google Scholar
PIMENTEL LOPES DE MELO, F., DIRZO, R. & TABARELLI, M. 2006. Biased seed rain in forest edges: evidence from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biological Conservation 132:50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PUIG, H. 1976. Végétation de la Huasteca, Mexique. Mission Arquéologique et Ethnologique Française au Mexique, Mexico City. 532 pp.Google Scholar
PUIG, H., BRACHO, R. & SOSA, V. 1987. El bosque mesófilo de montaña: composición florística y estructura. Pp. 55–79 in Puig, H. & Bracho, R. (eds.), El bosque mesófilo de montaña de Tamaulipas. Instituto de Ecología, Mexico City.Google Scholar
RAMÍREZ-MARCIAL, N., GONZÁLEZ-ESPINOSA, M. & QUINTANA-ASCENCIO, P. F. 1992. Banco y lluvia de semillas en comunidades sucesionales de bosques de pino-encino de los Altos de Chiapas, Mexico. Acta Botánica Mexicana 20:59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RUÍZ-JIMÉNEZ, C. A., MEAVE, J. & CONTRERAS JIMÉNEZ, J. L. 1999. El bosque mesófilo de la Región de Puerto Soledad (Oaxaca), México: análisis estructural. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 65:23–37.Google Scholar
RZEDOWSKI, J. 1978. La vegetación de México. Editorial Limusa, Mexico City. 432 pp.Google Scholar
RZEDOWSKI, J. 1996. Análisis preliminar de la flora vascular de los bosques mesófilos de montaña de México. Acta Botánica Mexicana 35:25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHIELDS, A. B. & WALKER, L. R. 2003. Bird perches increase forest seed on Puerto Rican landslides. Restoration Ecology 8:370–379.Google Scholar
SMITH, N., MORI, S. A., HENDERSON, A., STEVENSON, D. W. & HEALD, S. V. 2004. Flowering plants of the Neotropics. The New York Botanical Garden, New York. 594 pp.Google Scholar
SOSA, V. & PUIG, H. 1987. Regeneración del estrato arbóreo en el bosque mesófilo de montaña. Pp. 106–131 in Puig, H. & Bracho, R. (eds.). El bosque mesófilo de montaña de Tamaulipas. Instituto de Ecología, Mexico City.Google Scholar
USDA (UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE). 1980. Major weed family identification guide. Professional Development Center. Plant protection and quarantine animal and plant health inspection service. Creative Universal, Michigan. 161 pp.Google Scholar
VELÁZQUEZ, A, MAS, J. F. & PALACIO, J. L. 2002. Análisis del cambio de uso del suelo. Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, Mexico City. 72 pp.Google Scholar
WEBSTER, G. L. 1995. The panorama of neotropical cloud forests. Pp. 53–77 in Churchill, S. P., Balslev, H., Forero, E. & Luteyn, J. L. (eds.). Biodiversity and conservation of neotropical montane forest. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, S. J., MULLER-LANDAU, H. C., CALDERÓN, O. & HERNÁNDEZ, A. 2005. Annual and spatial variation in seedfall and seedling recruitment in a neotropical forest. Ecology 86:848–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZANE, A. E. & CHAPMAN, C. A. 2001. Expediting reforestation in tropical grasslands: distance and isolation from seed sources in plantations. Ecological Applications 11:1610–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar