Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:21:34.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diet composition of the invasive red-whiskered bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus in Mauritius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2010

Jannie Fries Linnebjerg ,
Dennis M. Hansen ,
Nancy Bunbury  and
Jens M. Olesen
Jannie Fries Linnebjerg*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade building 1540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Mauritian Wildlife Foundation, Grannum Road, Vacoas, Mauritius
Dennis M. Hansen
Affiliation:
Mauritian Wildlife Foundation, Grannum Road, Vacoas, Mauritius Department of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305, USA
Nancy Bunbury
Affiliation:
Seychelles Islands Foundation, PO Box 853, Victoria, Mahé, Seychelles
Jens M. Olesen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade building 1540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
*
1Corresponding author. Current address: National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Arctic Environment, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 358, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark; email: jannie.linnebjerg@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Disruption of ecosystems is one of the biggest threats posed by invasive species (Mack et al. 2000). Thus, one of the most important challenges is to understand the impact of exotic species on native species and habitats (e.g. Jones 2008). The probability that entire ‘invasive communities’ will develop increases as more species establish in new areas (Bourgeois et al. 2005). For example, introduced species may act in concert, facilitating one another's invasion, and increasing the likelihood of successful establishment, spread and impact. Simberloff & Von Holle (1999) introduced the term ‘invasional meltdown’ for this process, which has received widespread attention since (e.g. O'Dowd 2003, Richardson et al. 2000, Simberloff 2006). Positive interactions among introduced species are relatively common, but few have been studied in detail (Traveset & Richardson 2006). Examples include introduced insects and birds that pollinate and disperse exotic plants, thereby facilitating the spread of these species into non-invaded habitats (Goulson 2003, Mandon-Dalger et al. 2004, Simberloff & Von Holle 1999). From a more general ecological perspective, the study of interactions involving introduced and invasive species can contribute to our knowledge of ecological processes – for example, community assembly and indirect interactions.

Keywords

introduced speciesinvasional meltdownoceanic islandplant–animal interactionpositive interactionseed dispersal
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 347 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BOURGEOIS, K., SUEHS, C. M., VIDAL, E. & MÉDAILM, F. 2005. Invasional meltdown potential: facilitation between introduced plants and mammals on French Mediterranean islands. Ecoscience 12:248–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHEKE, A. S. 1987. An ecological history of the Mascarene islands, with particular reference to extinctions and introductions of land vertebrates. Pp. 5–89 in Diamond, A. W. (ed.). Mascarene island birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHEKE, A. S. & HUME, J. 2008. Lost land of the dodo. T. & A.D. Poyser, London. 464 pp.Google Scholar
CORLETT, R. T. 1998. Frugivory and seed dispersal by birds in Hong Kong shrubland. Forktail 13:23–27.Google Scholar
GOULSON, D. 2003. Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISLAM, K. & WILLIAMS, R. N. 2000. Red-whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/520bdoi:10.2173/bna.520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JONES, C. G. 2008. Practical conservation on Mauritius and Rodrigues: steps towards the restoration of devastated ecosystems. Pp. 226–259 in Cheke, A.S. & Hume, J.P. (eds.). Lost land of the dodo. T. & A.D. Poyser, London. 464pp.Google Scholar
LINNEBJERG, J. F., HANSEN, D. M. & OLESEN, J. M. 2009. Gut-passage effect of the introduced Red-whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus) on germination of invasive plant species in Mauritius. Austral Ecology 34:272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MACARTHUR, R. H. & WILSON, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 203 pp.Google Scholar
MACK, R. N., SIMBERLOFF, D., LONSDALE, W. M., EVANS, H., CLOUT, M. & BAZZAZ, F.A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10:689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MANDON-DALGER, I. 2002. Sélection de l'habitat et dynamique d'invasion d'un oiseau introduit, le cas du Bulbul orphée à la Réunion. Thèse de l'Université de Rennes1, Rennes. 209 pp.Google Scholar
MANDON-DALGER, I., CLERGEAU, P., TASSIN, J., RIVIÈRE, J., & GATTI, S. 2004. Relationships between alien plants and an alien bird species on Reunion Island. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20:635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MILLA, A., DOUMANDJI, S., VOISIN, J. F. & BAZIZ, B. 2005. Diet of the common bulbul Pycnonotus barbatus in the Algiers Sahel (Algeria). Revue d'Ecologie–La Terre et la vie 60:359–380.Google Scholar
O'DOWD, D. J. 2003. Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island. Ecology Letters 6:812–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICHARDSON, D. M., ALLSOPP, N., D'ANTONIO, C. M., MILTON, S. J. & REJMÁNEK, M. 2000. Plant invasions – the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews 75:65–93.Google ScholarPubMed
SAFFORD, R. J. 1997. A survey on the occurrence of the native vegetation remnants on Mauritius in 1993. Biological Conservation 80:181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIMBERLOFF, D. 2006. Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecology Letters 9:912–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SIMBERLOFF, D. & VON HOLLE, B. 1999. Positive interactions of non-indigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1:21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STRAHM, W. 1993. The conservation and restoration of the flora of Mauritius and Rodrigues. PhD Dissertation, University of Reading, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
SØRENSEN, I. H. 2005. The ecology of the endemic Mauritius Grey White-eye. M.Sc. Dissertation, University of Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
TRAVESET, A. & RICHARDSON, D. M. 2006. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:208–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VAUGHAN, R. E. & WIEHÉ, P. O. 1939. Note on ‘the plant communities of Mauritius’. Journal of Ecology 27:281.Google Scholar