Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:40:04.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of seed size and toucan regurgitation on the germination of the tropical tree Eugenia uniflora

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2022

Landon R. Jones*
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
Chelsey A. Hunts
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90840, USA
Lacy A. Dolan
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
Natasha K. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
Gabrielle N. Ripa
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
Emma A. Schultz
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
Varsha S. Shastry
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
Craig A. Sklarczyk
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
Bradly S. Thornton
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
Melanie R. Boudreau
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Landon R. Jones, Email: landon.jones@msstate.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the quality of seed dispersal effectiveness of frugivorous species can elucidate how endozoochory structures tropical forests. Large seeds, containing more resources for growth, and gut passage by frugivores, which remove seed pulp, both typically enhance the speed and probability of germination of tropical seeds. However, the interaction of seed size and gut passage has not been well studied. We assessed the role of two species of toucans (Ramphastos spp.) in seed germination of the tropical tree Eugenia uniflora, which produces seeds that vary considerably in size (3.7–14.3 mm), using 151 control and 137 regurgitated seeds in germination trials. We found that toucan regurgitation did not increase germination success, although 93.4% germinated compared to 76.8% of control seeds; however, larger seeds germinated more often at faster rates. Although only marginally significant, germination rates were 3.6× faster when seeds were both large and regurgitated by toucans, demonstrating that toucan regurgitation can disproportionally benefit larger E. uniflora seeds. As tropical forests are increasingly disturbed and fragmented by human activities, the ability of toucans to continue providing seed dispersal services to degraded habitats may be vital to the persistence of many tropical plants that contain larger seeds and depend on larger dispersers.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Endozoochory, or seed dispersal after ingestion by animals, is an integral process shaping plant reproductive success and the spatial structure and species composition of plant communities (Nathan and Muller-Landau, Reference Nathan and Muller-Landau2000; Levine and Murrell, Reference Levine and Murrell2003; Snell et al., Reference Snell, Beckman, Fricke, Loiselle, Carvalho, Jones, Lichti, Lustenhouwer, Schreiber, Strickland, Sullivan, Cavazos, Giladi, Hastings, Holbrook, Jongejans, Kogan, Montaño-Centellas, Rudolph, Rogers, Zwolok and Schupp2019). Approximately half of all fruit-producing, flowering plants are animal-dispersed (Aslan et al., Reference Aslan, Zavaleta, Tershy and Croll2013) and adaptations to facilitate dispersal may be found in up to 80% of tree species in tropical forests (Howe and Smallwood, Reference Howe and Smallwood1982). How animals facilitate seed dispersal can be critical to many ecological questions, including mutualism, plant abundance, seed competition, and coexistence (Levine and Murrell, Reference Levine and Murrell2003; Snell et al., Reference Snell, Beckman, Fricke, Loiselle, Carvalho, Jones, Lichti, Lustenhouwer, Schreiber, Strickland, Sullivan, Cavazos, Giladi, Hastings, Holbrook, Jongejans, Kogan, Montaño-Centellas, Rudolph, Rogers, Zwolok and Schupp2019). The benefit an individual plant receives from an animal disperser can be quantified in terms of seed dispersal effectiveness, specifically as quantity × quality (Schupp et al., Reference Schupp, Jordano and Gómez2010). Within this framework, quantity is the number of seeds dispersed, and quality is the probability of a seed producing a new adult plant (Schupp et al., Reference Schupp, Jordano and Gómez2010).

An important aspect of seed dispersal quality is the effect of gut treatment of frugivores on seed germination (Bewleyl, Reference Bewleyl1997; Schupp et al., Reference Schupp, Jordano and Gómez2010). Animals considered high-quality seed dispersers tend to enhance germination success (Traveset et al., Reference Travaset, Robertson, Rodriguez-Perez, Dennis, Schupp, Green and Westcott2007; Fuzessy et al., Reference Fuzessy, Conelissen, Janson and Silveira2016; Fricke et al., Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019) by swallowing fruits whole without damaging seeds, facilitating fruit pulp removal, and providing gentle gut treatment of seed tissue (i.e., in the form of mechanical and chemical scarring), before regurgitating or defecating seeds intact (Levey, Reference Levey1987; Schupp et al., Reference Schupp, Jordano and Gómez2010). Germination success post-gut treatment can be measured as (1) a greater percentage of seeds that germinate and/or (2) a lower time to germination (Traveset et al., Reference Travaset, Robertson, Rodriguez-Perez, Dennis, Schupp, Green and Westcott2007). Across animal taxa, the effect of frugivore ingestion on seed germination is generally positive, though the magnitude of the effect varies. For example, birds, primates, and bats tend to have a greater positive effect on proportion and speed of seed germination compared to other mammals or reptiles (Barnea et al., Reference Barnea, Yom-Tov and Friedman1991; Traveset, Reference Traveset1998; Verdú and Traveset, Reference Verdú and Traveset2004; Traveset and Verdú, Reference Travaset, Verdú, Levey, Silva and Galetti2009; Fuzessy et al., Reference Fuzessy, Conelissen, Janson and Silveira2016).

Germination success can also vary with seed size (Traveset and Verdú, Reference Travaset, Verdú, Levey, Silva and Galetti2009). In tropical tree species, if the resources are available, it is generally advantageous to produce larger seeds, as a greater number of internal resources can decrease seedling competition for limited external resources (Murali, Reference Murali1997; Deb and Sundriyal, Reference Deb and Sundriyal2017). Larger seeds in tropical forests tend to have a greater proportion of seeds germinating and faster germination rates (Daws et al., Reference Daws, Garwood and Pritchard2005, Reference Daws, Crabtree, Dalling, Mullins and Burslem2008; Fuzessy et al., Reference Fuzessy, Conelissen, Janson and Silveira2016; Deb and Sundriyal, Reference Deb and Sundriyal2017, but see Fricke et al., Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019). Seed size can also interact with seed retention time in the frugivore gut to affect germination. For example, larger seeds of terrestrial plants tend to spend less time in the gut and are more likely to be regurgitated than defecated because they limit nutrition intake (Levey, Reference Levey1987; Fukui, Reference Fukui2003). Shorter retention times potentially reduce the likelihood that seeds may be excessively abraded, augmenting germination success (Traveset and Verdú, Reference Travaset, Verdú, Levey, Silva and Galetti2009). In birds, larger species are generally perceived as being more effective seed dispersers, as they consume more seeds, disperse them longer distances, and have longer gut retention times; however, this effectiveness is often dependent on seed sizes consumed (Godínez-Alvarez et al., Reference Godínez-Alvarez, Ríos-Casanova and Peco2020). Thus, quantifying the general contribution of various birds to seed success in relation to seed size can give context to avian benefits on local plant populations and greater plant meta-population dynamics (Godínez-Alvarez et al., Reference Godínez-Alvarez, Ríos-Casanova and Peco2020).

Eugenia uniflora is a fleshy fruit-producing tropical tree native to South America (Morton, Reference Morton1987), that is largely vertebrate-dispersed (Stricker and Stiling, Reference Stricker and Stiling2013). Although fruits are similar in size, E. uniflora seeds vary considerably in size among fruits on the same individual tree, which can have a maximum length ranging from 11.0 to 15.5 mm (Smiderle et al., Reference Smiderle, Souza and Souza2016). Toucans (Ramphastidae) are large-bodied, highly frugivorous birds that consume fruits from a wide variety of plants in the Neotropics and are generally considered high-quality seed dispersers as their large gape permits them to swallow fruits whole without damaging seeds (Short and Horne, Reference Short, Horne, Perrins, Bock and Kikkawa2002). For instance, they have been found to be effective whole fruit-swallowing dispersers for Virola trees, removing and dispersing approximately 57% of seeds (Holbrook and Loiselle, Reference Holbrook and Loiselle2009). Here, we assessed toucan seed regurgitation, seed size, and seed germination relationships for E. uniflora. Compared to control seeds that experienced no toucan gut passage, we predicted that E. uniflora seeds regurgitated by toucans (1) would have improved germination success both in terms of the number of seeds germinated and the speed of germination and (2) gut treatment effects would be more prevalent for larger seeds. Finally, we predicted that (3) larger seeds would have a higher number of germinated seeds and would germinate faster, regardless of gut treatment.

Methods

In Costa Rica, several toucan species co-occur with E. uniflora trees. Within this region, we observed collared aracaris (Pteroglossus torquatus), a medium-sized toucan species, eating fruits of E. uniflora. We also found E. uniflora seeds underneath their roost and nest sites. As a result of observed toucan E. uniflora foraging, we picked ripe E. uniflora fruits from two trees at El Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), located 3 km east of Turrialba, Costa Rica (Figure 1) in mid-March 2013. The day after picking, we brought fruits to the Toucan Rescue Ranch in San Isidro de Heredia, Costa Rica (Figure 1) and hand fed them to four yellow-throated toucans (Ramphastos ambiguus) and five keel-billed toucans (Ramphastos sulfuratus). Both Ramphastos species in our captive population readily consumed E. uniflora and regurgitated fruit seeds. We fed five randomly selected E. uniflora fruits per bird within a 1-minute period and collected all seeds that could be located after regurgitation by the toucans. We repeated this procedure for a total of 28 hand-feeding events across the nine toucans (N = 140 seeds). None of the seeds were defecated. We brought all regurgitated seeds to CATIE the same evening in which they were collected and stored them in a sealed container to prevent desiccation.

Figure 1. (left) Location of El Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE, eastern star) and the Toucan Rescue Ranch in San Isidro de Heredia (western star) in Costa Rica. Locations are overlayed on top of the extent of tropical forests for context, as identified by the Central American Vegetation Landcover Classification Map (Central American Commission on Environment and Development, 1998). (right) Photo of a keel-billed toucan (Ramphastos sulfuratus) taking a Eugenia uniflora fruit in gut retention trials.

We began germination trials 2 days after collection from toucans in an indoor laboratory that was subject to temperature variation from outside daily temperatures, which ranged from 17° to 27° C during germination trials (temperatures which are well above the 12° C recommended lower limit for cultivation; World Agroforesty Centre). The morning of our trials, we collected E. uniflora fruits as controls from the same two trees harvested for regurgitation trials and mechanically removed the seeds from fruit pulp (Traveset et al., Reference Traveset, Riera and Mas2001). Each treatment and control seed was wrapped in a moist piece of paper towel approximately 6 × 6 cm and placed in separate petri dishes (Young and Evans, Reference Young and Evans1977). We randomly assigned all control and toucan-regurgitated petri dishes to spatial positions in a grid dispersed across counter space in the laboratory to minimize any potential bias in environmental effects. We determined that successful germination occurred if a radicle emerged from the seed (Barnea et al., Reference Barnea, Yom-Tov and Friedman1991; Bewleyl, Reference Bewleyl1997). Germination trials ran for 30 days, after which we considered all seeds that did not have radicle emergence as not germinated. Time to germination was measured in days, where day 0 was the first day of germination trials. All procedures were approved by El Ministerio del Ambiente y Energía (MINAE, permit # ACCVC-R-INV-025-2011) in Costa Rica and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette (permit # 2012-8717-059).

For analysis, we considered all seeds regurgitated together as the same treatment because we could not reliably assign seeds to either species or specific individuals in gut retention trials. We examined the presence–absence of germination using logistic regression, with toucan treatment and seed size included as main and interactive effects. We then examined the time to germination using a cox proportional hazards model, also with toucan treatment and seed size included as main and interactive effects. We considered both significant (P < 0.05) and marginally significant (P < 0.10) effects and present beta-coefficients ±SE as measures of effect size (Nakagawa and Cuthill, Reference Nakagawa and Cuthill2007). For cox proportional hazard models, we present odds ratios (OR) as measures of effect size. Analyses were conducted in R v. 4.1 (R Core Team, 2021).

Results

We collected a total of 151 control seeds and 137 seeds regurgitated from our nine toucans. The size of E. uniflora seeds ranged from 3.7 to 14.3 mm (Figure 2a). Although toucan regurgitation did not influence the proportion of germinated seeds (β ± SE = 2.27 ± 1.92, z = 1.19, P = 0.24), 93.4% of toucan-regurgitated seeds germinated (128 total) compared to 76.8% for 116 control seeds. There was, however, an effect of seed size on the proportion of germinated seeds (β ± SE = 0.72 ± 0.12, z = 5.97, P < 0.001), with an increase in the germination proportion as seed size increased (Figure 2b). The interaction of regurgitation and seed size on the number of seeds germinated was not significant (β ± SE = −0.11 ± 0.22, z = −0.49, P = 0.62).

Figure 2. Histogram of seed sizes (a), germination (b) presence in relation to seed size and time to germination according to (c) toucan regurgitation and (d) seed size for Pitanga (Eugenia uniflora) seeds near Turrialba, Costa Rica, 2013.

Whereas toucan regurgitation (OR ± SE = 0.27 ± 0.85, z = −1.52, P = 0.13) and seed size (OR ± SE = 1.07 ± 0.06, z = 1.08, P = 0.28) alone did not affect the speed of germination, the interaction between regurgitation and seed size did affect germination speed, although this was a marginal effect (OR ± SE = 1.16 ± 0.08, z = 1.82, P = 0.07). Mean speed of germination for toucan-regurgitated seeds was 10.7 ± 0.4 days compared to 11.1 ± 0.5 for control seeds (Figure 2c). Mean speed of germination was 12.3 ± 0.7, 11.7 ± 0.7, 10.2 ± 0.5 and 9.8 ± 0.5 days for seeds <10, 10–11, 11–12, and >12 mm in size, respectively (Figure 2d), indicating germination time declined as seed size increased. Overall, germination rates were 3.6× faster when seeds were both large and regurgitated by toucans.

Discussion

Although toucan regurgitation did not increase the prevalence of germination for E. uniflora seeds (prediction 1), the process did enhance germination speed, particularly when seeds were large (prediction 2). The effect of toucan regurgitation on germination speed is not surprising given that seeds ingested by frugivores are more likely to have greater germination rates. For example, a meta-analysis across 351 fruit ingestion experiments shows higher germination rates across 213 tree, shrub, and herbaceous plant species (Traveset and Verdú, Reference Travaset, Verdú, Levey, Silva and Galetti2009). These effects can also be influenced by the sizes of seeds ingested. Larger seeds tend to germinate faster compared to smaller seeds after gut treatment by primates, according to another meta-analysis (Fuzessy et al., Reference Fuzessy, Conelissen, Janson and Silveira2016). Additionally, toucans disperse large seeds of other plants such as palms (e.g., Syagrus romanzoffiana, Vespa et al., Reference Vespa, Zurita, Gatti and Bellocq2018) and nutmeg species (genus Virola, Howe Reference Howe1981, Reference Howe, Fleming and Estrada1993; Holbrook and Loiselle, Reference Holbrook, Loiselle, Dennis, Schupp, Green and Westcott2007; Jones, Reference Jones2017). Further, the functional extinction as the loss of large gape frugivores such as toucans from tropical forests can drive rapid evolutionary reduction in seed sizes (Galetti et al., Reference Galetti, Guevara, Côrtes, Fadini, Von Matter, Leite, Labecca, Ribeiro, Carvalho, Collevatti, Pires, Guimarães, Brancalion, Ribeiro and Jordano2013). Thus, there is precedence for the positive association between toucan regurgitation and seed success for larger seeds of E. uniflora. Although our predictions were only partially supported, our results demonstrate that toucans can provide germination benefits to E. uniflora seeds.

Although our results did not support that toucan regurgitation alone would improve both the number and speed of seeds germinated, and our interaction was marginally significant (i.e. perhaps weaker statistically but not biologically irrelevant; Nakagawa and Cuthill, Reference Nakagawa and Cuthill2007), this could have been due to the initial pulp removal from control seeds in our germination trials. Pulp removal is a key benefit seeds gain from animal gut passage (Levey, Reference Levey1987; Schupp et al. Reference Schupp, Jordano and Gómez2010; Fricke et al., Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019); therefore, pulp removal in our study is not truly reflective of natural processes. As a result, germination trials without control seed pulp removal would perhaps be more appropriate in gaging toucan regurgitation benefits (Fricke et al., Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019). Beyond pulp removal, there is some chemical scarification that occurs in gut treatment that is also beneficial for seed dispersal quality (Levey, Reference Levey1987; Schupp et al., Reference Schupp, Jordano and Gómez2010). Given that we compared seeds without pulp for both gut-treated and control seeds, we still found a 15% greater germination proportion of seeds with gut treatment, indicating that some scarification likely occurs and provides some benefits to seeds. We would expect that the benefits of toucan regurgitation alone would thus be greater under a depulp-scarification testing scenario (Fricke et al., Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019). Finally, gut retention time also plays a large role in germination success (Barnea et al., Reference Barnea, Yom-Tov and Friedman1991; Fukui, Reference Fukui2003; Verdú and Traveset, Reference Verdú and Traveset2004; Traveset and Verdú, Reference Travaset, Verdú, Levey, Silva and Galetti2009; Fricke et al., Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019). Although we were unable to disentangle the effect of gut retention time on seed germination rates, future research could investigate the role of retention time on germination of E. uniflora, and the effect of toucan gut retention on other plant species consumed by Ramphastos toucans.

We also documented a positive effect of seed size on the proportion of germinated seeds and speed of germination (prediction 3). Our results are similar to other studies on Eugenia species (Amador and Barbedo, Reference Amador and Barbedo2015). Eugenia uniflora seeds have no dormancy period and are sensitive to desiccation (Stricker and Stiling, Reference Stricker and Stiling2013; Pavithra et al., Reference Pavithra, Swamy, Suresh and Ruchita2020; Pirola et al., Reference Pirola, Wagner, Dotto, Cassol, Possenti and Citadin2021). Typically, seeds sensitive to desiccation, which are more common in tropical systems, are larger, have a greater moisture content, and have faster germination rates (Bazzaz and Pickett, Reference Bazzaz and Pickett1980; Vázquez-Yanez and Orozco-Segovia Reference Vázquez-Yanez and Orozco-Segovia1993; Daws et al., Reference Daws, Garwood and Pritchard2005). Additionally, 86.1% of all our E. uniflora seeds germinated within 30 days, irrespective of toucan treatment. In most tropical forest trees, germination is observed and advantageous promptly after dispersal, likely as a means to minimize predation and to capitalize on ephemeral resources, such as moisture, light, and space (Bazzaz and Pickett, Reference Bazzaz and Pickett1980; Vázquez-Yanez and Orozco-Segovia, Reference Vázquez-Yanez and Orozco-Segovia1993; Daws et al., Reference Daws, Garwood and Pritchard2005).

Toucan dispersal effectiveness is likely highly variable and dependent on the plant species. For example, Guettarda viburnoides seeds have greater germination success when eaten by pulp-feeding jays (Cyanocorax cyanomelas) compared to seed-swallowing toucans (Pteroglossus castanotis) because of the differences in the ways they select and handle fruit (Loayza and Rios, Reference Loayza and Rios2014). Additionally, toucans may also be effective dispersers for E. uniflora within other parts of the seed dispersal framework. For example, Ramphastos toucans may be good dispersers in terms of quantity, as they can remove the most seeds from nutmeg trees (Virola sebifera, Howe, Reference Howe1981) and carry and scatter more seeds further from the crown of the parent tree, increasing their survival (dispersal quality, Howe, Reference Howe, Fleming and Estrada1993). Large vertebrates in Neotropical systems, such as toucans, primates, and ungulates, are capable of dispersing seeds too large for smaller animals to consume and tend to disperse seeds over large distances, which makes them influential in maintaining ecosystem diversity and plant meta-population dynamics (Levey, Reference Levey1987; Vidal et al. Reference Vidal, Pires and Guimarães2013; Andresen et al., Reference Andresen, Arroyo-Rodriguez and Ramos-Robles2018; Fuzessy et al., Reference Fuzessy, Janson and Silviera2018). Large frugivorous birds in particular, can be valuable to dispersal as they will cross open areas (Vidal et al., Reference Vidal, Pires and Guimarães2013) and may readily travel across open areas and diverse landscape mosaics (Graham, Reference Graham2001; Moreira et al., Reference Moreira, Riba-Hernández and Lobo2017). As tropical forests are becoming highly disturbed and fragmented by human activities, the ability of large frugivorous birds such as toucans to continue providing seed dispersal services to degraded landscapes may be vital to the persistence of many tropical plants (Holbrook and Loiselle, Reference Holbrook and Loiselle2009; Moreira et al., Reference Moreira, Riba-Hernández and Lobo2017). This is particularly concerning in the face of large vertebrate disperser population declines, which may lead to the collapse of critical plant–animal mutualistic relationships maintaining the integrity of terrestrial ecosystems (Aslan et al., Reference Aslan, Zavaleta, Tershy and Croll2013; Andresen et al., Reference Andresen, Arroyo-Rodriguez and Ramos-Robles2018). Thus, researching seed dispersal services for a variety of plant species, particularly for degraded landscapes and declining tropical communities is of critical conservation importance (McConkey et al., Reference McConkey, Prasad, Corlett, Campos-Arceiz, Brodie, Rogers and Santamaria2012). This work helps contextualize the role large vertebrates, such as toucans, play in the sustainability and resilience of tropical ecosystems.

Acknowledgements

We thank CATIE and MINEA in Costa Rica for enormous logistical support, permitting aid, and permission to conduct the field study. We also thank J. and L. Howle and the Toucan Rescue Ranch for the use of their facility and logistical support. We also thank K. Gibson and several volunteer technicians who conducted germination trials.

Financial support

LJ was supported by a Louisiana Board of Regents Fellowship, U.S. Fulbright Fellowship to Costa Rica for 2011–2012, and the Biology Department at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Amador, TS and Barbedo, CJ (2015) Germination inhibits the growth of new roots and seedlings in Eugenia uniflora and Eugenia brasiliensis. Journal of Seed Science 37, 241247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andresen, E, Arroyo-Rodriguez, V and Ramos-Robles, M (2018) Primate seed dispersal: old and new challenges. International Journal of Primatology 39, 443465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslan, CE, Zavaleta, ES, Tershy, B and Croll, D (2013) Mutualism disruption threatens global plant biodiversity: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 8, e66993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnea, A, Yom-Tov, Y and Friedman, J (1991) Does ingestion by birds affect seed germination? Functional Ecology 5, 394402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, FA and Pickett, STA (1980) Physiological ecology of tropical succession: a comparative review. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 11, 287310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewleyl, JD (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. The Plant Cell 9, 10551056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central American Commission on Environment and Development (1998) Central American Vegetation/Land Cover Classification and Conservation Status. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC).Google Scholar
Daws, MI, Crabtree, LM, Dalling, JW, Mullins, CE and Burslem, DFRP (2008) Germination responses to water potential in neotropical pioneers suggest large-seeded species take more risks. Annals of Botany 102, 945951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daws, MI, Garwood, NC and Pritchard, HW (2005) Traits of recalcitrant seeds in a semi-deciduous tropical forest in Panamá: some ecological implications. Functional Ecology 19, 874885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, P and Sundriyal, RC (2017) Effect of seed size on germination and seedling fitness in four tropical rainforest tree species. Indian Journal of Forestry 40, 313322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, EC, Bender, J, Rehm, EM and Rogers, HS (2019) Functional outcomes of mutualistic network interactions: a community-scale study of frugivore gut passage on germination. Journal of Ecology 107, 757767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, A (2003) Relationship between seed retention time in bird’s gut and fruit characteristics. Ornithological Science 2, 4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuzessy, LF, Conelissen, TG, Janson, C and Silveira, FAO (2016) How do primates affect seed germination? A meta-analysis of gut passage effects on neotropical plants. Oikos 125, 10691080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuzessy, LF, Janson, C and Silviera, FAO (2018) Effects of seed size and frugivory degree on dispersal by Neotropical frugivores. Acta Oecologica 93, 4147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galetti, M, Guevara, R, Côrtes, MC, Fadini, R, Von Matter, S, Leite, AB, Labecca, F, Ribeiro, T, Carvalho, CS, Collevatti, RG, Pires, MM, Guimarães, PR, Brancalion, PH, Ribeiro, MC and Jordano, P (2013) Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science 340, 10861090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godínez-Alvarez, H, Ríos-Casanova, L and Peco, B (2020) Are large frugivorous birds better seed dispersers than medium- and small-sized ones? Effect of body mass on seed dispersal effectiveness. Ecology and Evolution 10, 61366143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, CH (2001) Factors influencing movement patterns of keel-billed toucans in a fragmented tropical landscape in southern Mexico. Conservation Biology 15, 17891798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, KM and Loiselle, BA (2007) Using toucan-generated dispersal models to estimate seed dispersal in Amazonian Ecuador. In Dennis, A, Schupp, E, Green, R and Westcott, D (eds), Seed Dispersal: Theory and Its Application in a Changing World. Wallingford, UK: CAB International Publishing, pp. 300321.Google Scholar
Holbrook, KM and Loiselle, BA (2009) Dispersal in a Neotropical tree, Virola flexuosa (Myristicaceae): does hunting of large vertebrates limit seed removal? Ecology 90, 14491455.Google Scholar
Howe, H (1981) Dispersal of a neotropical nutmeg (Virola sebifera) by Birds. The Auk 98, 8898.Google Scholar
Howe, HF (1993) Aspects of variation in a neotropical seed dispersal system. In Fleming, TH and Estrada, A (eds), Frugivory and Seed Dispersal: Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 149162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, HF and Smallwood, J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13, 201228.Google Scholar
Jones, LR (2017) Modeling the effects of animal movements and behavior on spatial patterns of seed dispersal in fragmented landscapes. PhD Thesis. University of Louisiana at Lafayette.Google Scholar
Levey, DJ (1987) Seed size and fruit-handling techniques of Avian Frugivores. The American Naturalist 129, 471485.Google Scholar
Levine, JM and Murrell, DJ (2003) The community-level consequences of seed dispersal patterns. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34, 549574.Google Scholar
Loayza, AP and Rios, RS (2014) Seed-swallowing Toucans are less effective dispersers of Guettarda viburnoides (Rubiaceae) than Pulp-feeding Jays. Biotropica 46, 6977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConkey, KR, Prasad, S, Corlett, RT, Campos-Arceiz, A, Brodie, JF, Rogers, H and Santamaria, L (2012) Seed dispersal in changing landscapes. Biological Conservation 146, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, JI, Riba-Hernández, P and Lobo, JA (2017) Toucans (Ramphastos ambiguus) facilitate resilience against seed dispersal limitation to a large-seeded tree (Virola surinamensis) in a human-modified landscape. Biotropica 49, 502510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J (1987) Fruits of Warm Climates. Miami, USA: Creative Resource Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
Murali, KS (1997) Patterns of seed size, germination and seed viability of tropical tree species in Southern India. Biotropica 29, 271279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S and Cuthill, IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews 82, 591605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathan, R and Muller-Landau, HC (2000) Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, 278285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavithra, S, Swamy, G, Suresh, GJ and Ruchita, T (2020) Study on viability of Surinam cherry (Eugenia uniflora L.) seeds on germination behaviour and Vigour of the seedling. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 9, 18021804.Google Scholar
Pirola, K, Wagner, A Jr, Dotto, M, Cassol, DA, Possenti, JC and Citadin, I (2021) Dormancy in native fruit seeds of the Brazilian South Region. Colloquium Agrariae 17, 2132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Schupp, EW, Jordano, P and Gómez, JM (2010) Seed dispersal effectiveness revisited: a conceptual review. New Phytologist 188, 333353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Short, LL and Horne, JFM (2002) Toucans, Barbets, and Honeyguides. In Perrins, CM, Bock, WJ and Kikkawa, J (eds), Bird Families of the World Series. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, pp. 4455.Google Scholar
Smiderle, OJ, Souza, G and Souza, AA (2016) Morphological aspects of seeds, emergence and growth of seedlings of Surinam cherry trees sown at different depths. Journal of Plant Sciences 4, 119.Google Scholar
Snell, RS, Beckman, NG, Fricke, E, Loiselle, BA, Carvalho, CS, Jones, LR, Lichti, NI, Lustenhouwer, N, Schreiber, SJ, Strickland, C, Sullivan, LL, Cavazos, BR, Giladi, I, Hastings, A, Holbrook, K, Jongejans, E, Kogan, O, Montaño-Centellas, F, Rudolph, J, Rogers, HS, Zwolok, R, Schupp, E (2019) Consequences of intraspecific variation in seed dispersal for plant demography, communities, evolution and global change. AoB Plants 11, plz016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stricker, KB and Stiling, P (2013) Seedlings of the introduced invasive shrub Eugenia uniflora (Myrtaceae) outperform those of its native and introduced non-invasive congeners in Florida. Biological Invasions 15, 19731987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traveset, A (1998) Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores’ guts on germination: a review. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1, 151190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traveset, A, Riera, N and Mas, RE (2001) Passage through bird guts causes interspecific differences in seed germination characteristics. Functional Ecology 15, 669675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travaset, A, Robertson, AW and Rodriguez-Perez, J (2007) A review on the role of endozoochory in seed germination. In Dennis, AJ, Schupp, EW, Green, RJ and Westcott, DA (eds), Seed Dispersal: Theory and Its Application in a Changing World. Wallinford, UK: CAB International, pp. 78103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travaset, A and Verdú, M (2009) A meta-analysis of the effect of gut treatment on seed germination. In Levey, DJ, Silva, WR and Galetti, M (eds), Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. New York, USA: CAB International, pp. 339349.Google Scholar
Vázquez-Yanez, C and Orozco-Segovia, A (1993) Patterns of seed longevity and germination in the tropical rainforest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24, 6987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdú, M and Traveset, A (2004) Bridging meta-analysis and the comparative method: a test of seed size effect on germination after frugivores’ gut passage. Oecologia 138, 414418.Google Scholar
Vespa, NI, Zurita, GA, Gatti, MG and Bellocq, MI (2018) Seed movement between the native forest and monoculture tree plantations in the southern Atlantic forest: a functional approach. Forest Ecology and Management 430, 126133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, MM, Pires, MM and Guimarães, PR (2013) Large vertebrates as the missing components of seed-dispersal networks. Biological Conservation 163, 4248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, JA and Evans, RA (1977) Squirreltail seed germination. Journal of Range Management 30, 3336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. (left) Location of El Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE, eastern star) and the Toucan Rescue Ranch in San Isidro de Heredia (western star) in Costa Rica. Locations are overlayed on top of the extent of tropical forests for context, as identified by the Central American Vegetation Landcover Classification Map (Central American Commission on Environment and Development, 1998). (right) Photo of a keel-billed toucan (Ramphastos sulfuratus) taking a Eugenia uniflora fruit in gut retention trials.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Histogram of seed sizes (a), germination (b) presence in relation to seed size and time to germination according to (c) toucan regurgitation and (d) seed size for Pitanga (Eugenia uniflora) seeds near Turrialba, Costa Rica, 2013.