Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:37:59.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Home-range size and territoriality in Bolomys lasiurus (Rodentia: Muridae) in an Amazonian savanna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

William E. Magnusson
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Institute Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Caixa Postal 478, 69011–970 Manaus AM, Brasil
Angelo De Lima Francisco
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Institute Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Caixa Postal 478, 69011–970 Manaus AM, Brasil
Tania M. Sanaiotti
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Institute Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Caixa Postal 478, 69011–970 Manaus AM, Brasil

Abstract

Bolomys lasiurus is the only species of rodent commonly found in the savanna of Alter do Chão, central Amazonia. Peak densities during 42 months were less than have been reported from the cerrado biome of central Brazil. However, the population at Alter do Chão appears to be more stable than those in other areas and we never recorded zero densities. Many animals were captured over periods greater than 7 months, indicating that either mortality or dispersal was less than in previous studies. Mean home-range size of females was inversely related to the proportion of females that were gravid or lactating. Female home ranges were mutually exclusive and averaged 35% (SD = 8.2%) of male home ranges. Male home ranges overlapped extensively. Indices of home-range size varied seasonally and among years.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Alho, C. J. R. 1979a. Relative exclusiveness of space as a measure of spatial distribution of mammal populations. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 39:275299.Google Scholar
Alho, C. J. R. 1979b. The application of a technique to survey small mammal populations under ecological circumstances. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 39:597600.Google Scholar
Alho, C. J. R. 1982. Brazilian rodents: their habitats and habits. Pp. 143166 in Mares, M. A. & Genoways, H. H. (eds). Mammalian biology in South America. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. 539 pp.Google Scholar
Erlinge, S., Hoogenboom, I., Agrell, J., Nelson, J. & Sandell, M. 1990. Density related home-range size and overlap in adult field voles (Microtus agrestis) in southern Sweden. Journal of Mammalogy 71:597603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francisco, A. D. L., Magnusson, W. E. & Sanaiotti, T. M. In press. Variation in growth and reproduction of Bolomys lasiurus (Rodentia: Muridae) in an Amazonian savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology.Google Scholar
Glanz, W. E. 1982. Adaptive zones of neotropical mammals: a comparison of some temperate and tropical patterns. Pp. 95101 in Mares, M. A. & Genoways, H. H. (eds). Mammalian Biology in South America. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. 539 pp.Google Scholar
Heske, E. J. & Ostfeld, R. S. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in size, relative size of testes, and mating systems in North American voles. Journal of Mammalogy 71(4):510519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, O. 1982. Significance of savanna vegetation in the Amazon Territory of Venezuela. Pp. 221224 in Prance, G. T. (ed.). Biological diversification in the tropics. Columbia University Press, New York. 741 pp.Google Scholar
Macêdo, R. H. & Mares, M. A. 1987. Geographic variation in the South American cricetine rodent Bolomys lasiurus. Journal of Mammalogy 68:578594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazurkiewicz, M. 1971. Shape, size and distribution of home ranges of Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber 1780). Acta Theriologica 16:2360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, D. A. 1980. Estudo populacional de algumas espécies de roedores do cerrado (norte do município de Formosa, Goiás). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 40:843860.Google Scholar
Miranda, I. De S. 1991. Estrutura e Fenologia de uma Comunidade Arbórea da Savana Amazônica de Alter do Chão, Pará. Master's Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/Universidade Federal do Amazonas. Manaus. 129 pp.Google Scholar
Ostfeld, R. S. 1985. Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents. American Naturalist 126(1):115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostfeld, R. S. 1986. Territoriality and mating system of California voles. Journal of Animal Ecology 55:691706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavone, L. V. & Boonstra, R. 1985. The effects of toe clipping on the survival of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:499501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, L. A. 1982. Uso ecológico do espaço de Zygodontomys lasiurus (Rodentia, Cricetinae) em habitat natural de cerrado do Brasil central. Master's Thesis, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília. 128 pp.Google Scholar
Sanaiotti, T. M. & Magnusson, W. E. 1995. Effects of annual fires on the production of fleshy fruits used by birds in Brazilian Amazonian savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11:5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, M. J. & Alho, C. J. R. 1980. Distribuiçāo espacial do roedor silvestre Zygodontomys lasiurus em habitat natural do cerrado. Brasil Florestal 44:3174.Google Scholar
Swihart, R. K. & Slade, N. A. 1989. Differences in home-range size between sexes of Microtus ochrogaster. Journal of Mammalogy 70:816820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valle, C. M. C., Alves, M. C., Santos, I. B. & Varejäo, J. B. M. 1982. Observaçāo sobre dinâmica de populaçāo de Zygodontomys lasiurus (Lund, 1841), Colomys expulsus (Lund, 1841) e Orytomys subflavus (Wagner, 1842) em vegetaçāo de cerrado no Vale do Rio das Velhas (Prudente de Morais, Minas Gerais, Brasil – 1981) Rodentia = Cricetidae. Lundiana 1952(2):7083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT. The system for statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
Wood, M. D. & Slade, N. A. 1990. Comparison of ear-tagging and toe-clipping in Prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Journal of Mammalogy 7:252255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar