Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:07:00.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Landscape patterns influence communities of medium- to large-bodied vertebrates in undisturbed terra firme forests of French Guiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2015

Cécile Richard-Hansen ,
Gaëlle Jaouen ,
Thomas Denis ,
Olivier Brunaux ,
Eric Marcon  and
Stéphane Guitet
Cécile Richard-Hansen*
Affiliation:
ONCFS (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage), EcoFoG, ONCFS Campus agronomique, BP 316, 97379 Kourou cedex French Guiana, France
Gaëlle Jaouen
Affiliation:
ONCFS (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage), EcoFoG, ONCFS Campus agronomique, BP 316, 97379 Kourou cedex French Guiana, France
Thomas Denis
Affiliation:
ONCFS (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage), EcoFoG, ONCFS Campus agronomique, BP 316, 97379 Kourou cedex French Guiana, France
Olivier Brunaux
Affiliation:
ONCFS (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage), EcoFoG, ONCFS Campus agronomique, BP 316, 97379 Kourou cedex French Guiana, France
Eric Marcon
Affiliation:
ONCFS (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage), EcoFoG, ONCFS Campus agronomique, BP 316, 97379 Kourou cedex French Guiana, France
Stéphane Guitet
Affiliation:
ONCFS (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage), EcoFoG, ONCFS Campus agronomique, BP 316, 97379 Kourou cedex French Guiana, France
*
1Corresponding author. Email: cecile.richard-hansen@ecofog.gf
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Whereas broad-scale Amazonian forest types have been shown to influence the structure of the communities of medium- to large-bodied vertebrates, their natural heterogeneity at smaller scale or within the terra firme forests remains poorly described and understood. Diversity indices of such communities and the relative abundance of the 21 most commonly observed species were compared from standardized line-transect data across 25 study sites distributed in undisturbed forests in French Guiana. We first assessed the relevance of a forest typology based on geomorphological landscapes to explain the observed heterogeneity. As previously found for tree beta-diversity patterns, this new typology proved to be a non-negligible factor underlying the beta diversity of the communities of medium- to large bodied vertebrates in French Guianan terra firme forests. Although the species studied are almost ubiquitous across the region, they exhibited habitat preferences through significant variation in abundance and in their association index with the different landscape types. As terra firme forests represent more than 90% of the Amazon basin, characterizing their heterogeneity – including faunal communities – is a major challenge in neotropical forest ecology.

Keywords

animal communitiesdiversityenvironmental heterogeneityFrench Guianalandscape ecologyspecies-habitat association
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 423 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ANDERSON, L. O., MALHI, Y., LADLE, R. J., ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C., SHIMABUKURO, Y., PHILLIPS, O. L., BAKER, T. R., COSTA, A. C. L., ESPEJO, J. S., HIGUCHI, N., LAURANCE, W. F., LOPEZ-GONZALEZ, G., MONTEAGUDO, A. L., NUÑEZ-VARGAS, P., PEACOCK, J., QUESADA, C. A., ALMEIDA, S. & VASQUEZ, R. 2009. Influence of landscape heterogeneity on spatial patterns of wood productivity, wood specific density and above ground biomass in Amazonia. Biogeosciences 6:1883–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDERSON, M. J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26:32–46.Google Scholar
ARROYO-RODRIGUEZ, V. & FAHRIG, L. 2014. Why is a landscape perspective important in studies of primates? American Journal of Primatology 76:901–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BONNOT, T. W., THOMPSON, F. R., MILLSPAUGH, J. & JONES-FARRAND, D. T. 2013. Landscape-based population viability models demonstrate importance of strategic conservation planning for birds. Biological Conservation 165:104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUCHANAN-SMITH, H. M., HARDIE, S. M., CACERES, C. & PRESCOTT, M. J. 2000. Distribution and forest utilization of Saguinus and other primates of the Pando Department, Northern Bolivia. International Journal of Primatology 21:353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUCKLAND, S. T., ANDERSON, D. R., BURNHAM, K. P. & LAAKE, J. L. 1993. Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Chapman & Hall, London. 446 pp.Google Scholar
CHAO, A. & SHEN, T. J. 2003. Nonparametric estimation of Shannon's index of diversity when there are unseen species in sample. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10:429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CID, B., OLIVEIRA-SANTOS, L. R. & MOURAO, G. 2013. Seasonal habitat use of agoutis (Dasyprocta azarae) is driven by the palm Attalea phalerata in Brazilian Pantanal. Biotropica 45:380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, D. B. & CLARK, D. A. 2000. Landscape-scale variation in forest structure and biomass in a tropical rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management 137:185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COBLENTZ, D. D. & RIITTERS, K. H. 2004. Topographic controls on the regional-scale biodiversity of the south-western USA. Journal of Biogeography 31:1125–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COUTERON, P., PÉLISSIER, R., MAPAGA, D., MOLINO, J.-F. & TEILLIER, L. 2003. Drawing ecological insights from a management-oriented forest inventory in French Guiana. Forest Ecology and Management 172:89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE CACERES, M. & LEGENDRE, P. 2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90:3566–3574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DE CACERES, M., LEGENDRE, P. & MORETTI, M. 2010. Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos 119:1674–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE CACERES, M., LEGENDRE, P., WISER, S. K. & BROTON, L. 2012. Using species combinations in indicator value analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3:973–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE THOISY, B., BROSSE, S. & DUBOIS, M.-A. 2008. Assessment of large-vertebrate species richness and relative abundance in Neotropical forest using line-transect censuses: what is the minimal effort required? Biodiversity and Conservation 17:2627–2644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE THOISY, B., RICHARD-HANSEN, C., GOGUILLON, B., JOUBERT, P., OBSTANCIAS, J., WINTERTON, P. & BROSSE, S. 2010. Rapid evaluation of threats to biodiversity: human footprint score and large vertebrate species responses in French Guiana. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:1567–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEICHMANN, J. L., LIMA, A. P. & WILLIAMSON, G. B. 2011. Effects of geomorphology and primary productivity on Amazonian leaf litter herpetofauna. Biotropica 43:149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DENIS, T. 2012. Caractérisation et sélection de l’habitat chez le Hocco alector (Crax alector) en Guyane française. MSc thesis, AgroParisTech, Montpellier.Google Scholar
DOLÉDEC, S. & CHESSEL, D. 1989. Rythmes saisonniers et composantes stationnelles en milieu aquatique. II Prise en compte et élimination d’effects dans un tableau faunistique. Acta Oecologica 10:207–232.Google Scholar
DRAY, S. & DUFOUR, A.-B. 2007. The ade4 Package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DRAY, S., PÉLISSIER, R., COUTERON, P., FORTIN, M.-J., LEGENDRE, P., PERES-NETO, P. R., BELLIER, E., BIVAND, R., BLANCHET, F. G., DE CACERES, M., DUFOUR, A.-B., HEEGAARD, E., JOMBART, T., MUNOZ, F., OKSANEN, J., THIOULOUSE, J. & WAGNER, H. 2012. Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecological Monographs 82:257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DUFRÊNE, M. & LEGENDRE, P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species : the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67:345–366.Google Scholar
EMMONS, L. H. 1984. Geographic variation in densities and diversities of non-flying mammals in Amazonia. Biotropica 16:210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAYAD, I., BAGHDADIA, N., GOND, V., BAILLY, J. S., BARBIER, N., EL HAJJ, M. & FABRE, F. 2014. Coupling potential of ICESat/GLAS and SRTM for the discrimination of forest landscape types in French Guiana. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 33:21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FIGUEIREDO, F. O. G., COSTA, F. R. C., NELSON, B. W. & PIMENTEL, T. P. 2014. Validating forest types based on geological and land-form features in central Amazonia. Journal of Vegetation Science 25:198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FREESE, C., HELTNE, P. G., CASTRO, N. & WHITESIDES, G. 1982. Patterns and determinants of monkey densities in Peru and Bolivia, with notes on distributions. International Journal of Primatology 3:53–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GAILLARD, J. M., HEBBLEWHITE, M., LOISON, A., FULLER, M., POWELL, P., BASILE, M. & VAN MOORTER, B. 2010. Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 365:2255–2265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOND, V., FREYCON, V., MOLINO, J.-F., BRUNAUX, O., INGRASSIA, F., JOUBERT, P., PEKEL, J.-F., PRÉVOST, M. F., THIERRON, V., TROMBE, P. J. & SABATIER, D. 2011. Broad scale pattern of forest landscape types in Guiana Shield. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 13:357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRASSBERGER, P. 1988. Finite sample corrections to entropy and dimension estimates. Physics Letters A 128:369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUITET, S., CORNU, J. F., BRUNAUX, O., BETBEDER, J., CAROZZA, J. M. & RICHARD-HANSEN, C. 2013. Landform and landscape mapping, French Guiana (South America). Journal of Maps 9:325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUITET, S., PELISSIER, R., BRUNAUX, O., JAOUEN, G. & SABATIER, D. 2015. Geomorphological landscape features explain floristic patterns in French Guiana rainforest. Biodiversity and Conservation. doi: 10.1007/s10531-014-0854-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAUGAASEN, T. & PERES, C. A. 2005a. Mammal assemblage structure in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21:133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAUGAASEN, T. & PERES, C. A. 2005b. Primate assemblage structure in amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. American Journal of Primatology 67:243–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HAUGAASEN, T. & PERES, C. A. 2008. Population abundance and biomass of large-bodied birds in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. Bird Conservation International 18:87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAWES, J. E., PERES, C. A., RILEY, L. B. & HESS, L. 2012. Landscape-scale variation in structure and biomass of Amazonian seasonally flooded and unflooded forests. Forest Ecology and Management 281:163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEYMANN, E. W., ENCARNACION, F. & CANAQUIN, J. 2002. Primates of the Rio Curaray, Northern Peruvian Amazon. International Journal of Primatology 23:191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HILL, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHNSON, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOST, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOST, L. 2008. GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Molecular Ecology 17:4015–4026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JULLIOT, C. & SABATIER, D. 1993. Diet of red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus) in French Guiana. International Journal of Primatology 14:527–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KINDT, R., VAN DAMME, P. & SIMONS, A. J. 2006. Tree diversity in western Kenya: using profiles to characterise richness and evenness. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:1253–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEHMAN, S. M. 2004. Biogeography of the primates of Guyana: effects of habitat use and diet on geographic distribution. International Journal of Primatology 25:1225–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARCON, E. & HÉRAULT, B. 2015. Entropart, an R package to partition diversity. Journal of Statistical Software, in press.Google Scholar
MARCON, E., HÉRAULT, B., BARALOTO, C. & LANG, G. 2012. The decomposition of Shannon's entropy and a confidence interval for beta diversity. Oikos 121:516–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARCON, E., SCOTTI, I., HÉRAULT, B., ROSSI, V. & LANG, G. 2014. Generalization of the partitioning of Shannon diversity. PLoS ONE 9. e90289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MELO, F. P. L., ARROYO-RODRIGUEZ, V., FAHRIG, L., MARTINEZ-RAMOS, M. & TABARELLI, M. 2013. On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28:462–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MOCKRIN, M. H., ROCKWELL, R. F., REDFORD, K. H. & KEULER, N. S. 2011. Effects of landscape features on the distribution and sustainability of ungulate hunting in northern Congo. Conservation Biology 25:514–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PAGET, D. 1999. Etude de la diversité spatiale des écosystèmes forestiers Guyanais. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale du Génie Rural des Eaux et Forêts. 188 pp.Google Scholar
PALACIOS, E. & PERES, C. A. 2005. Primate population densities in three nutrient-poor Amazonian terra firme forests of south-eastern Colombia. Folia Primatologica 76:135–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PALMINTERI, S., POWELL, G. & PERES, C. A. 2011. Regional-scale heterogeneity in primate community structure at multiple undisturbed forest sites across south-eastern Peru. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27:181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PATIL, G. P. & TAILLIE, C. 1982. Diversity as a concept and its measurement. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77:548–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PATTERSON, B. D., CEBALLOS, G., SECHREST, W., TOGNELLI, M. F., BROOKS, T., LUNA, L., ORTEGA, P., SALAZAR, I. & YOUNG, B. E. 2005. Digital distribution maps of the mammals of the western hemisphere, version 2.0. NatureServe. Arlington.Google Scholar
PÉLISSIER, R., COUTERON, P., DRAY, S. & SABATIER, D. 2003. Consistency between ordination techniques and diversity measurements : two strategies for species occurence data. Ecology 84:242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PERES, C. A. 1997. Primate community structure at twenty western Amazonian flooded and unflooded forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRIEGO-SANTANDER, A. G., CAMPOS, M., BOCCO, G. & RAMÍREZ-SÁNCHEZ, L. G. 2013. Relationship between landscape heterogeneity and plant speciesrichness on the Mexican Pacific coast. Applied Geography 40:171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICHARD-HANSEN, C. 2006. Biodiversité et paysages en forêt guyanaise. Développement d’une méthodologie de caractérisation et de spatialisation des habitats à l’usage des gestionnaires des milieux naturels forestiers. Pp. 153–154 in Nivet, C., McKey, D. & Legris, C. (eds.) Ecosystèmes tropicaux. 2ème colloque de restitution du programme de recherche. Ministère de l’écologie et du développement durable, Paris.Google Scholar
SABATIER, D., GRIMALDI, M., PREVOST, M. F., GUILLAUME, J., GODRON, M., DOSSO, M. & CURMI, P. 1997. The influence of soil cover organization on the floristic and structural heterogeneity of a Guianan rain forest. Plant Ecology 131:81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHWARZKOPF, L. & RYLANDS, A. B. 1989. Primate species richness in relation to habitat structure in Amazonian rainforest fragments. Biological Conservation 48:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHANNON, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27:379–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIMMEN, B., JULLIOT, C., BAYART, F. & PAGÈS-FEUILLADE, E. 2001. Diet and population densities of the primate community in relation to fruit supplies. Pp. 89–101 in Bongers, F., Charles-Dominique, P., Forget, P.-M. & Théry, M. (eds.). Nouragues. Dynamics and plant–animal interactions in a neotropical rainforest. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
SIMPSON, J. 1949. Measurements of diversity. Nature 163:688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOMBROEK, W. 2000. Amazon landforms and soils in relation to biological diversity. Acta Amazonica 30:81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOMBROEK, W. 2001. Spatial and temporal patterns of Amazon rainfall – consequences for the planning of agricultural occupation and the protection of primary forests. Ambio 30:388–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SUSSMAN, R. W. & PHILLIPS-CONROY, J. E. 1995. A survey of the distribution and density of the primates of Guyana. International Journal of Primatology 16:761–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TSALLIS, C. 1988. Possible generalization of Boltzmann–Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52:479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar