Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:02:02.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nocturnal foraging in a diurnal tropical lizard (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Phelsuma laticauda) on Hawaii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

Tal Seifan ,
Aya Federman ,
William J. Mautz ,
Kenneth J. Smith  and
Yehudah L. Werner
Tal Seifan
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolution and Ecology, Plant Ecology Department, Tübingen University, Auf der Morgenstelle 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
Aya Federman
Affiliation:
Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel
William J. Mautz
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Hawaii at Hilo, 200 W. Kawili St., Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4091, USA
Kenneth J. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Hawaii at Hilo, 200 W. Kawili St., Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4091, USA
Yehudah L. Werner*
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolution and Ecology, Plant Ecology Department, Tübingen University, Auf der Morgenstelle 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
*
1Corresponding author. Email: yehudah_w@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Animals must eat, necessitating their encounter with food. At least one of the two, predator or prey, must move for the two to meet. Many predators forage for prey by one of two strategies, or foraging modes. They forage either actively, in which case their prey may be mobile or sessile, or passively by waiting in ambush, depending on prey motility. These two foraging modes have been studied extensively in lizards as a model organism (Cooper 1995, Huey & Pianka 1981, Pianka 1966, Pietruzska 1986). Many aspects of a species' biology are correlated with its foraging mode. For example, active foragers employ their chemosensory apparatus for following the prey's trail. Sit-and-wait foragers rely on their eyes to identify approaching prey (Cooper 1995). Other differences are briefly referenced elsewhere (Werner et al. 1997, 2004).

Keywords

commensalismforaging modegold dust day geckoobserver effectsexual diergismsexual dimorphismtail regenerationtemperature effect
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , March 2010 , pp. 243 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ANANJEVA, N. B. & TSELLARIUS, A. Y. 1986. On the factors determining desert lizards' diet. Pp. 445–448 in Rocek, Z. (ed.). Studies in herpetology (Proceedings of the European Herpetological Meeting, Prague). Charles University, Prague.Google Scholar
AVERY, R. A. 1982. Field studies on body temperatures and thermoregulation. Pp. 93–166 in Gans, C. & Pough, F. H. (eds). Biology of the Reptilia. vol. 12, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
BAUER, A. M. 2007. The foraging biology of the Gekkota: life in the middle. Pp. 371–404 in Reilly, S. M., McBrayer, L. B. & Miles, D. B. (eds). Lizard ecology: the evolutionary consequences of foraging mode in lizards. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOUSKILA, A., EHRLICH, D., GERSHMAN, Y., LAMPL, I., MOTRO, U., SHANI, E., WERNER, U. & WERNER, Y. L. 1992. Activity of a nocturnal lizard (Stenodactylus doriae) during a lunar eclipse at Hazeva (Israel). Acta Zoologica. Lilloana 41:271–275.Google Scholar
COOPER, W. E. 1995. Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards. Animal Behaviour 50:973–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRANKENBERG, E. 1979. Influence of light and temperature on daily activity patterns of three Israeli forms of Ptyodactylus (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Journal of Zoology (London) 189:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRANKENBERG, E. & WERNER, Y. L. 1979. Effect of lunar cycle on daily activity rhythm in a gekkonid lizard, Ptyodactylus. Israel Journal of Zoology 28:224–228.Google Scholar
GLAW, F. & VENCES, M. 1994. A fieldguide to the amphibians and reptiles of Madagascar. (Second edition). M. Vences & F. Glaw, Koeln.Google Scholar
HILLER, U. & WERNER, Y. L. 2008. First evidence of unicellular glands in the general epidermis of terrestrial reptiles. Naturwissenschaften 95:193–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HUEY, R. B. & PIANKA, E. R. 1981. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62:991–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KERR, G. D., BULL, C. M. & MACKAY, D. 2004. Human disturbance and stride frequency in the sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa): implications for behavioural studies. Journal of Herpetology 38:519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAYHEW, W. W. 1968. Biology of desert amphibians and reptiles. Pp. 195–356 in Brown, G. W. (ed.). Desert biology. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCKEOWN, S. 1993. The general care and management of day geckos. Advanced Vivarium Systems, Lakeside.Google Scholar
OTA, H. & INEICH, I. 2006. Colonization of the gold dust day gecko, Phelsuma laticauda (Reptlia: Gekkonidae), in Moorea of the Society Archipelago, French Polynesia. Current Herpetology 25:97–99.Google Scholar
PERRY, G. 1996. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in Anolis polylepis: evidence from intraspecific variation in foraging behavior and diet. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74:1238–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PERRY, G. & FISHER, R. N. 2006. Night lights and reptiles: observed and potential effects. Pp. 169–191 in Rich, C. & Longcore, T. (eds). Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
PERRY, G., BUCHANAN, B. W., FISHER, R. N., SALMON, M. & WISE, S. E. 2008. Effects of artificial night lighting on reptiles and amphibians in urban environments. Pp. 239–258 in Jung, R. E. & Mitchell, J. C. (eds.). Urban herpetology. Herpetological conservation. Vol. 3. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Salt Lake, Utah.Google Scholar
PERSAUD, D., WERNER, N. & WERNER, Y. L. 2003. The foraging mode of three sphaerodactylin geckos on Trinidad and Tobago (Sauria: Gekkonoidea: Sphaerodactylini: Gonatodes). Journal of Natural History 37:1765–1777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PETREN, K. & CASE, T. J. 1996. An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77:118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PIANKA, E. R. 1966. Convexity, desert lizards, and spatial heterogeneity. Ecology 47:1055–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PIETRUZSKA, R. D. 1986. Search tactics of desert lizards: how polarized are they? Animal Behaviour 34:1742–1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RHODES, M. E. & RUBIN, R. T. 1999. Functional sex differences (“sexual diergism”) of CNS cholinergic systems, vasopressin, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in mammals: a selective review. Brain Research Reviews 30:135–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SELIGMANN, H., ANDERSON, S. C., AUTUMN, K., BOUSKILA, A., SAF, R., TUNIYEV, B. S. & WERNER, Y. L. 2007. Analysis of the foraging mode of a nocturnal desert lizard Reptilia: Gekkonidae: Teratoscincus scincus) under varying moonlight. Zoology 110:104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIEVERT, L. M. & HUTCHISON, V. H. 1988. Light versus heat: thermoregulatory behavior in a nocturnal lizard (Gekko gecko). Herpetologica 44:266–273.Google Scholar
STANNER, M., KUMTHORN, T., WERNER, N. & WERNER, Y. L. 1998. Observations and comments on the tokay in Thailand and China as predator and as prey (Reptilia: Sauria: Gekkonidae: Gekko gecko). Dactylus 3:69–84.Google Scholar
SUGERMAN, R. A. & HACKER, R. A. 1980. Observer effects on collared lizards. Journal of Herpetology 14:188–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TANAKA, S. & NISHIHIRA, M. 1987. A field study of seasonal, daily, and diel activity patterns of Eublepharis kuroiwae kuroiwae. Herpetologica 43:482–489.Google Scholar
WERNER, Y. L. 1976. Optimal temperatures for inner-ear performance in gekkonoid lizards. Journal of Experimental Zoology 195:319–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WERNER, Y. L. 1990. Habitat dependent thermal regimes of two Hawaiian geckos (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Journal of Thermal Biology 15:281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WERNER, Y. L., CARILLO, DE, ESPINOZA, N., HUEY, R. B., ROTHENSTEIN, D., SALAS, A. W. & VIDELA, F. 1996. Observations on body temperatures of some Neotropical desert geckos (Reptilia: Sauria: Gekkoninae). Cuadernos de Herpetología 10:62–67.Google Scholar
WERNER, Y. L., OKADA, S., OTA, H., PERRY, G. & TOKUNAGA, S. 1997. Varied and fluctuating foraging modes in nocturnal lizards of the family Gekkonidae. Asiatic Herpetological Research 7:153–165.Google Scholar
WERNER, Y. L, TAKAHASHI, H., YASUKAWA, Y. & OTA, H. 2004. The varied foraging mode of the subtropical eublepharid Goniurosaurus kuroiwae orientalis. Journal of Natural History 38:119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WERNER, Y. L., TAKAHASHI, H., YASUKAWA, Y. & OTA, H. 2006. Factors affecting foraging behaviour, as seen in a nocturnal ground lizard, Goniurosaurus kuroiwae kuroiwae. Journal of Natural History 40:439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar