Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:57:01.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pollination ecology and breeding system of Oroxylum indicum (Bignoniaceae) in the foothills of the Western Himalaya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

Vikas ,
Mayank Gautam ,
Rajesh Tandon  and
H. Y. Mohan Ram
Vikas
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
Mayank Gautam
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
Rajesh Tandon*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
H. Y. Mohan Ram
Affiliation:
194, SFS DDA Flats, Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi 110 009, India
*
1Corresponding author. Email: rjtnd@rediffmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Bat-pollinated (chiropterophilous) flowers are characterized by a wide-throated corolla, foetid odour, production of a copious amount of pollen and nectar, and most importantly nocturnal blooming (Faegri & van der Pijl 1979). In India, out of the 28 chiropterophilous plants reported (Subramanya & Radhamani 1993) only Ceiba pentandra (Bombacaceae) has been investigated in some detail (Nathan et al. 2005).

Keywords

bat pollinationCynopterus sphinxIndialate-acting self-incompatibilityovular receptivityspecializationthigmosensitive stigma
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 93 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BITTENCOURT, N. S. & SEMIR, J. 2005. Late-acting self-incompatibility and other breeding systems in Tabebuia (Bignoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 166:493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRUDEN, R. W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31:32–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAEGRI, K. & VAN DER PIJL, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 291 pp.Google Scholar
FRANSSEN-VERHEIJEN, M. A. W. & WILLEMSE, M. T. M. 1993. Micropylar exudate in Gasteria (Aloaceae) and its possible function in pollen tube growth. American Journal of Botany 80:253–262.Google Scholar
GOULD, E. 1978. Foraging behavior of Malaysian nectar-feeding bats. Biotropica 10;184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HESLOP-HARRISON, J. & HESLOP-HARRISON, Y. 1970. Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Technology 45:115–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KEARNS, C. A. & INOUYE, D. W. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Colorado. 583 pp.Google Scholar
LINSKENS, H. F. & ESSER, K. 1957. Über eine specifische Anfärbung der Pollenschläuche im Griffel und die Zahl der Kallosepfropfen nach Selbstung und Fremdung. Naturwissenschaften 44:16.Google Scholar
MARSHALL, A. G. 1985. Old World phytophagous bats (Megachiroptera) and their food plants: a survey. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 83:351–369.Google Scholar
MCCANN, C. 1939. Notes on the fulvous fruit-bat (Rousettus leschenaulti Desm.). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 41:805–816.Google Scholar
MUCHHALA, N. 2007. Adaptive trade-off in floral morphology mediates specialization for flowers pollinated by bats and hummingbirds. The American Naturalist 169:494–504.Google Scholar
NATHAN, P. T., RAGHURAM, H., ELANGOVAN, V., KARUPPUDURAI, T. & MARIMUTHU, G. 2005. Bat pollination of kapok tree, Ceiba pentandra. Current Science 88:1679–1681.Google Scholar
SAGE, T. L. & WILLIAMS, E. G. 1995. Structure, ultrastructure and histochemistry of the pollen tube pathway in the milkweed Asclepias exaltata L. Sexual Plant Reproduction 8:257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SINGH, J. & CHAUHAN, S. V. S. 1996. Morphological changes in the stigma of seasonally transient sterile Tecoma stans L. Phytomorphology 46:1–7.Google Scholar
SOKAL, R. R. & ROHLF, F. J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. (Third edition). W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. 887 pp.Google Scholar
SRITHONGCHUAY, T., BUMRUNGSRI, S. & SRIPAO-RAYA, E. 2008. Pollination ecology of the late-successional tree, Oroxylum indicum (Bignoniaceae) in Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24:477–484.Google Scholar
STEBBINS, G. L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. 1. Pollination mechanisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STEPHENSON, A. G. 1979. An evolutionary examination of the floral display of Catalpa speciosa (Bignoniaceae). Evolution 33:1200–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SUBRAMANYA, S. & RADHAMANI, T. R. 1993. Pollination by birds and bats. Current Science 65:201–209.Google Scholar