Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:06:14.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovering from forest-to-pasture conversion: leaf decomposition in Central Amazonia, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

Leda Lorenzo ,
Natalia Pérez-Harguindeguy ,
Fernando Casanoves  and
Alexandre Adalardo de Oliveira
Leda Lorenzo*
Affiliation:
Ecology Department, São Paulo University (USP), Rua do Matão, trav.14, n°321. São Paulo. SP. CEP: 05508-090
Natalia Pérez-Harguindeguy
Affiliation:
Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (CONICET-UNC), Velez Sarsfield 1611 (X5016GCA), Ciudad Universitária, Córdoba, Argentina
Fernando Casanoves
Affiliation:
Unidad de Bioestadística, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), 7170 Turialba, Costa Rica
Alexandre Adalardo de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Ecology Department, São Paulo University (USP), Rua do Matão, trav.14, n°321. São Paulo. SP. CEP: 05508-090
*
1Corresponding author. Email: ledalomo@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Land-use change in tropical forests can affect the micro-environment for decomposition under modified canopies. In turn, decomposition may have consequences for soil fertility and ecosystem sustainability. The effects of the conversion from primary forest to pastures on leaf-litter decomposition and its recovery in secondary forests 20 y after pasture abandonment were evaluated using litterbags and a general mixed model approach. Litterbags containing leaf-litter of two contrasting qualities were placed in those three ecosystems and the mass remaining after 90 d was quantified. The mass remaining was 50% lower in high- than in low-quality leaves. The effects of the decomposition environment depended on the substrate quality. Although differences among ecosystems were not significant for low-quality leaves, high-quality leaves decomposed more slowly in pastures than in forests (mean dry mass remaining was 38% in pastures, 14% in secondary and 12% in primary forest). The decomposition of common substrates did not differ among forests. Results show that the conversion of primary forest to pasture may produce conditions for slower decomposition; however, these conditions appear be restored to a great extent in 20-y-old secondary forests.

Keywords

decomposition-environmentland-useleaf-littermass-lossrain forestsecond-growth
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 93 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BARLOW, J., GARDNER, T. A., FERREIRA, L.V. & PERES, C. A. 2007. Litter fall and decomposition in primary, secondary and plantation forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management 247:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CASTANHO, C. T., LORENZO, L. & OLIVERIA, A. A. 2012. The importance of mesofauna and decomposition environment on leaf decomposition in three forests in southeastern Brazil. Plant Ecology 213:1303–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAVIDSON, E. A., VERCHOT, L. V., CATTÂNIO, J. H., ACKERMAN, I. L. & CARVALHO, J. E. M. 2000. Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry 48:53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIDHAM, R. K. 1998. Altered leaf-litter decomposition rates in tropical forest fragments. Oecologia 116:397–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FEARNSIDE, P. M. & BARBOSA, R. I. 2004. Accelerating deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: towards answering open questions. Environmental Conservation 31:7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FELDPAUSCH, T. R., RONDON, M. A., FERNANDES, E. C. M., RIHA, S. J. & WANDELLI, E. 2004. Carbon and nutrient accumulation in secondary forests regenerating on pastures in central Amazonia. Ecological Applications 14(suppl.):S164–S176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JENNY, H., GESSEL, S. P. & BINGHAM, F. T. 1949. Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Science 68:419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOUTIKA, L. S., BARTOLI, F., ANDREUX, F., CERRI, C. C., BURTIN, G., CHONE, T. & PHILIPPY, R. 1997. Organic matter dynamics and aggregation in soils under rain forest and pastures of increasing age in the eastern Amazonia Basin. Geoderma 76:87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOUTIKA, L. S., CHONE, T., ANDREUX, F. & CERRI, C. C. 2000. Carbon decomposition of the topsoils and soil fractions under forest and pasture in the western Brazilian Amazon basin, Rondônia. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30:284–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAVELLE, P., BLANCHART, E., MARTIN, A., MARTIN, S., SPAIN, A., TOUTAIN, F., BAROIS, I. & SCHAFER, R., 1993. A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: applications to soils of the humid tropics. Biotropica 25:130–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUIZÃO, R. C. C., COSTA, E. S. & LUIZÃO, F. J. 1999. Mudanças na biomassa microbiana e nas transformações de nitrogênio do solo em uma sequencia de idades de pastagens após derruba e queima da floresta na Amazônia Central. Acta Amazonica 29:43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARKEWITZ, D., DAVIDSON, E., MOUTINHO, P. & NEPSTAD, D. 2004. Nutrient loss and redistribution after forest clearing on a highly weathered soil in Amazonia. Ecology Applications 14(suppl.):S177–S199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARTIUS, C., HÖFER, H., GARCIA, M. V. B., RÖMBKE, J. & HANAGARTH, W. 2004. Litter fall, litter stocks and decomposition rates in rainforest and agroforestry sites in central Amazonia. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 68:137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MESQUITA, R. C. G., WORKMAN, S. W. & NEELY, C. L. 1998. Slow litter decomposition in a Cecropia-dominated secondary forest of Central Amazonia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30:167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ORWIN, K. H., WARDLE, D. A., LAURENCE, G. & GREENFIELD, L. G. 2006. Ecological consequences of carbon substrate identity and diversity in a laboratory study. Ecology 87:580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PINHEIROS, J. C. & BATES, D. M. 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York. 528 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAIERETTI, M. V., PÉREZ-HARGUINDEGUY, N., GURVICH, D. E., CINGOLANI, A. M. & CABIDO, M. 2005. Decomposition dynamics and physico-chemical leaf quality of abundant species in a montane woodland in central Argentina. Plant and Soil 278:223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAIERETTI, M. V., CINGOLANI, A. M., PÉREZ-HARGUINDEGUY, N., GURVICH, D. & CABIDO, M. 2010. Does decomposition of standard materials differ among grassland patches maintained by livestock? Austral Ecology 35:935–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VASCONCELOS, H. L. & LAURANCE, W. F. 2005. Influence of habitat, litter type, and soil invertebrates on leaf-litter decomposition in a fragmented Amazonian landscape. Oecologia 144:456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIEDER, W. R., CLEVELAND, C. C. & TOWNSEND, A. R. 2009. Controls over leaf litter decomposition in wet tropical forests. Ecology 90:3333–3341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed