The resorption of phosphorus is greater than that of nitrogen in senescing leaves of vascular epiphytes from lowland Panama

Abstract

The epiphytic habitat is assumed to be nutrient deficient, although this generally held notion is based almost completely on circumstantial evidence (Zotz & Hietz 2001). Most studies on the nutrient relations of vascular epiphytes focus on nitrogen (Bergstrom & Tweedie 1998, Hietz & Wanek 2003, Stewart et al. 1995). Although nitrogen plays a key role in limiting plant growth worldwide, there is an on-going discussion whether nitrogen or rather phosphorus are more limiting in many tropical forests (Grubb 1989, Harrington et al. 2001, Vitousek & Howarth 1991). To identify which nutritional factor is most limiting for plant growth, nutrient ratios have been proposed as a very useful tool (Koerselman & Meuleman 1996). These authors stated that N:P ratios exceeding 16 are indicative of P limitation, while an N:P ratio <14 suggests N limitation. Some reports of such ratios in the epiphyte literature indicate that phosphorus may indeed be limiting for epiphytes in tropical forests. For example, the N:P ratio of two field-grown bromeliads (Tillandsia circinnata and T. usneoides) decreased dramatically from 23.6 and 40.4, respectively, to 3.6 and 3.4, respectively, when fertilized with both N and P in the laboratory (Benzing & Renfrow 1974a). On the other hand, however, the average N:P ratios of mature leaves of 41 epiphyte species compiled from a number of papers did not appear particularly high (12.1±10.5, cf. Zotz & Hietz 2001).