Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:16:42.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seedling recruitment failure following dipterocarp mast fruiting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2004

Arthur G. Blundell
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA Corresponding author. Current address: Diplomacy Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science, USAID–Forestry Team, 3426 16th St NW #308, Washington, DC 20010, USA. Email: art.blundell@alum.dartmouth.org
David R. Peart
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA

Abstract

Many rain-forest trees in South-East Asia, including the dominant canopy family Dipterocarpaceae, reproduce in gregarious mast-fruiting events once every 2–11 y (Ashton et al. 1988). The dominant hypothesis for the evolution of masting is that predators are incapable of consuming mast seed crops, so that natural selection has favoured parent trees that fruit in synchrony (Janzen 1974, 1976). Mast flowering and fruiting are visually spectacular and quantified in harvest records for dipterocarp species producing large, oil-rich tengkawang seeds (Curran et al. 1999). Seedling recruitment following a mast is less obvious and has no immediate commercial value. However, a number of pulses of recruitment have been documented (Ashton et al. 1988, Chan 1980, Fox 1972, Liew & Wong 1973). These, together with general acceptance of the satiation hypothesis, have led to the widespread assumption that masts reliably increase seedling density and generate distinct seedling cohorts (Whitmore 1998). Indeed, foresters in Malaysia and Indonesia often recommend harvesting only after a mast, to ensure high densities of seedling regeneration.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)