Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:44:35.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulating forest shade to study the developmental ecology of tropical plants: juvenile growth in three vines in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

David W. Lee
David W. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both light quantity and quality affect the development and autoecology of plants under shade conditions, as in the understorey of tropical forests. However, little research has been directed towards the relative contributions of lowered photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) versus altered spectral distributions (as indicated by quantum ratios of 660 to 730 nm, or R:FR) of radiation underneath vegetation canopies. A method for constructing shade enclosures to study the contribution of these two variables is described. Three tropical leguminous vine species (Abrus precatonus L., Caesalpinia bondicela Fleming and Mucuna prunens (L.) DC) were grown in two shade enclosures with 3–4% of solar PPFD with either the R:FR of sunlight (1.10) or foliage shade (0.33), and compared to plants grown in sunlight. Most species treated with low R:FR differed from those treated with high R:FR in (1) percent allocation to dry leaf weight, (2) internode length, (3) dry stem weight/length, (4) specific leaf weight, (5) leaf size, and (6) chlorophyll a/b ratios. However, these plants did not differ in chlorophyll content per leaf dry weight or area. In most cases the effects of low R:FR and PPFD were additional to those of high R:FR and low PPFD. Growth patterns varied among the three species, but both low PPFD and diminished R:FR were important cues in their developmental responses to light environments. This shadehouse system should be useful in studying the effects of light on the developmental ecology of other tropical forest plants.

Keywords

developmental ecologyforest shadeIndiaphotosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD)red/far redshadehousevine
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , August 1988 , pp. 281 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Arnon, D. L. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgans. Plant Physiology 24:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, O. 1981. Responses to different quantum flux densities. Pp. 57–107 in Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B. & Ziegler, H. (eds). Physiological plant ecology I. Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology, N.S., 12A. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Chabot, B. F. & Chabot, J. F. 1977. Effects of light and temperature on leaf anatomy and photosynthesis in Fragana vesca. Oecologia, Berlin 26:363–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Child, R., Morgan, D. C. & Smith, H. 1981. Morphogenesis in simulated shadelight quality. Pp. 409–420 in Smith, H. (ed.). Plants and the daylight spectrum. Academic Press, New York. 508 pp.Google Scholar
Corre, W. J. 1983. Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants II. The influence of light quality. Acta Botanica Ncderlandica 32:185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dengler, N. G. 1980. Comparative histological basis of sun and shade leaf dimorphism in Helianthus annus. Canadian Journal of Botany 58:717–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankland, B. & Letendre, R. J. 1978. Phytochrome and effects of shading on growth of woodland plants. Photochemistry and Photobiology 27:223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, R. E., McCauley, S. W. & Melis, A. 1985. Effect of light quality on chloroplast-membrane organization and funtion in pea. Planta 164:487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley, New York. 222 pp.Google Scholar
Heathcote, L., Bambridge, K. R. & McLaren, J. S. 1979. Specially constructed growth cabinets for simulation of the spectral photon distributions found under natural vegetation canopies. Journal of Experimental Botany 30:347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hébant, C. & Lee, D. W. 1984. Ultrastructural basis and developmental control of blue iridescence in Selaginella leaves. American Journal of Botany 71:216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurik, T. W., Chabot, J. W. & Chabot, B. F. 1982. Effects of light and nutrients on leaf size, CO, exchange, and anatomy in wild strawberry (Fragaria virginuma). Plant Physiology 70:1044–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperbauer, M. J. 1971. Spectral distribution of light in a tobacco canopy and effects of end-of-day light quality on growth and development. Plant Physiology 47:775–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperbauer, M. J. & Hamilton, J. L. 1984. Chloroplast structure and starch grain accumulation in leaves that received different red and far-red levels during development. Plant Physiology 74:967–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwesiga, F. & Grace, J. 1986. The role of the red/far-red ratio in the response of tropical tree seedlings to shade. Annals of Botany 57:283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecharney, A. & Jacques, R. 1982. Photo-inhibition of internode elongation rate in light-grown Vigna sinensts L. Control by light quality. Plant, Cell and Environment 5:31–36.Google Scholar
Lee, D. W. 1985. Duplicating foliage shade for research on plant development. HortScience 20:116–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. W. 1987. The spectral distribution of radiation in two neotropical forests. Biotropica 19:161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. W. & Graham, R. 1986. Leaf optical properties of rain-forest sun and extreme shade plants. American Journal of Botany 73:1100–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClaren, J. S., Smith, H. 1978. Phytochrome control of the growth and development of Rumex obtusifolius under simulated canopy light environments. Plant, Cell and Environment 1:61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. C. R. & Smith, H. 1979. A systematic relationship between phytochrome-controlled development and species habitat, for plants grown in simulated natural radiation. Planta 145:253–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, D. C. R. & Smith, H. 1981. Control of development in Chenopodium album L. by shadelight: the effect of light quantity (total fluence rate) and light quality (red/far-red ratio). New Phytologist 88:239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. H. & Lee, D. W. 1986. Light effects on leaf morphology in water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). American Journal of Botany 73:1741–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, F. B. 1981. Twilight effect: initiating dark measurement in photopenodism of Xanthtum. Plant Physiology 67:1230–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. (ed.). 1981. Plants and the daylight spectrum. Academic Press, New York. 508 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, H. 1982. Light quality, photoreception and plant strategy. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33:481–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasker, R. & Smith, H. 1976. The function of phytochrome in the natural environment. V. Seasonal changes in radiant energy quality. Photochemistry and Photobiology 16:487–481.Google Scholar
Vince-Prue, D. 1977. Photocontrol of stem elongation in light-grown plants of Fuchsta hybnda. Planta 133:149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vince-Prue, D. 1983. The perception of light-dark transitions. Philosopical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B303:523–536.Google Scholar
Whitlam, G. G. & Johnson, C. B.. 1982. Photomorphogenesis in Impatiens parviflora and other species under simulated natural canopy radiations. New Phytologist 90:611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. E. 1981. Light quality and stem growth in Impatiens parviflora DC. New Phytologist 89:47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar