Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:57:21.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specialization for canopy position by hemiepiphytic Ficus species in a Bornean rain forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Timothy G. Laman
Timothy G. Laman
Affiliation:
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growth habits of five species of hemiepiphytic fig trees (Ficus subgenus Urostigma) were compared to see if any species occupied distinct canopy positions or showed unique host preferences in lowland rain forest in Gunung Palung National Park, Indonesian Borneo. Highly significant differences among species were found in the height of establishment on hosts, the level at which fig crowns were deployed, and the size and taxa of host trees. Ficus stupenda, F. dubia, and F. subtecta all had mean establishment heights between 29 and 31m above the ground, had their crowns in the upper canopy, and predominantly occupied large trees in the Dipterocarpaceae. F. consociata and F. xylophylla established at significantly lower mean heights of 24 and 18 m respectively, had their crowns predominantly in lower canopy layers, and disproportionately occupied smaller non-dipterocarp trees. These patterns were consistent both within lowland forest on alluvial terraces, which was most intensively sampled, and when data were combined from three other contiguous lowland forest habitats. Ficus species appear to be specialized to some extent for distinct microhabitats within the canopy.

Keywords

BorneocanopyFicusfighemiepiphyteIndonesiarain forest
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 12 , Issue 6 , November 1996 , pp. 789 - 803
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Bennett, B. C. 1986. Patchiness, diversity, and abundance relationships of vascular epiphytes. Selbyana 9:70–75.Google Scholar
Benzing, D. H. 1981. Bark surfaces and the origin and maintenance of diversity among angiosperm epiphytes: a hypothesis. Selbyana 5:248–255.Google Scholar
Clark, D. B. & Clark, D. A. 1990. Distribution and effects on tree growth of lianas and woody hemiepiphytes in a Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E. J. H. 1988. Wayside trees of Malaya. United Selangor Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Daniels, J. D. & Lawton, R. O. 1991. Habitat and host preferences of Ficus crassiuscula, a neotropical strangling fig of the lower-montane rain forest. Journal of Ecology 79:129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, J. D. & Lawton, R. O. 1993. A natural history of strangling by Ficus crassiuscula in Costa Rican lower montane rain forest. Selbyana 14:59–63.Google Scholar
Grubb, P. J. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews 52:107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, P. J. 1986. Problems posed by sparse and patchily distributed species in species-rich plant communities. Pp. 207–225 in Diamond, J. & Case, T. J. (eds.). Community ecology. Harper & Row Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Guy, P. R. 1977. Notes on the host species of epiphytic figs (Ficus spp.) on the flood-plain of the Mana Pools Game Reserve, Rhodesia. Kirkia 10:559–562.Google Scholar
Hammel, B. E. 1986. The vascular flora of La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica Moraceae. Selbyana 9:243–259.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1979. How to be a fig. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:13–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laman, T. G. 1995a. Ficus stupenda germination and seedling establishment in a Bornean rain forest canopy. Ecology 76:2617–2626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laman, T. G. 1995b. The ecology of stranger fig seedling establishment. Selbyana 16:223–229.Google Scholar
Lambert, F. 1989. Fig-eating by birds in a Malaysian lowland rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5:401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, M. & Leighton, D. R. 1983. Vertebrate responses to fruiting seasonality within a Bornean rain forest. Pp. 181–196 in Sutton, S. L., Whitmore, T. L. & Chadwick, A. C. (eds.). Tropical rain forest: ecology and management. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Michaloud, G. & Michaloud-Pelletier, S. 1987. Ficus hemi-epiphytes (Moraceae) et arbres supports. Biotropica 19:125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, F. S. P. (ed.). 1978. Tree flora of Malaya; a manual for foresters. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Putz, F. E. & Holbrook, N. M. 1986. Notes on the natural history of hemiepiphytes. Selbyana 9:61–69.Google Scholar
Silvertown, J. & Law, R. 1987. Do plants need niches? Some recent developments in plant community ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2:24–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Ter Steege, H. & Cornelissen, J. H. C. 1989. Distribution and ecology of vascular epiphytes in lowland rain forest of Guyana. Biotropica 21:331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J. 1986. Keystone plant resources in the tropical forest. Pp. 330–344 in Soule, M. (ed.). Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. C. 1991. Population densities and patterns of habitat use among anthropoid primates in the Ituri Forest, Zaïre. Biotropica 23:68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todzia, C. 1986. Growth habits, host tree species, and density of hemiepiphytes on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 18:22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. 1985. Tropical rainforests of the Far East. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Yoda, K. 1974. Three-dimensional distribution of light intensity in a tropical rain forest of West Malaysia. Japanese Journal of Ecology 24:247–254.Google Scholar