Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:17:12.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transfer of macro-nutrients to the atmosphere during experimental burnings in an open cerrado (Brazilian savanna)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Vania R. Pivello
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia Geral, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leopoldo M. Coutinho
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia Geral, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

This paper presents the quantities of macro-nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S) released from the ground layer vegetation to the atmosphere during six experimental burnings, in a Brazilian open savanna, named ‘campo-cerrado’. The values were obtained by comparing the amounts of nutrients in the fuel and in the ash resulting after the burn, in three different seasons. On average, 20.6 kg of N, 1.6kg of P, 7.1 kg of K, 12.1kg of Ca, 3.0 kg of Mg, and 3.2kg of S ha−1 were transferred from the plant biomass to the atmosphere, representing mean percentages of 95% for N, 51% for P, 44% for K, 52% for Ca, 42% for Mg, and 59% for S. The burn season showed no significant influence on the amounts of nutrients transferred to the atmosphere. Some relationships involving the quantities of macro-nutrients released, fuel moisture, the combustion efficiency during the burns, and the initial standing biomass in the area were also tested. Comparing the average output of macro-nutrients to the atmosphere obtained in this study with their inputs via rainfall, in the same area, it was estimated that three years would be an adequate interval between prescribed burnings for this campo-cerrado, to speed up nutrient recycling without impoverishing the system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: Centre for Environmental Technology, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S. E. 1964. Chemical aspects of heather burning. Journal of Applied Ecology 1:347367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boerner, R. E. J. 1982. Fire and nutrient cycling in temperate ecosystems. Bioscience 32:187192.Google Scholar
Booysen, P. V. & Tainton, N. M. (eds). 1984. Ecological effects of fire in South African ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York. 426 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgan, R. E. & Rothermel, R. C. 1984. BEHAVE: Fire behavior prediction and fuel modelling system – fuel subsystem. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 56pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, N. L. 1977. Fire and soil-plant nutrient relations in a pine-wiregrass savanna on the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Oecologia 31:2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutinho, L. M. 1978. O conceito de cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 1:1723.Google Scholar
Coutinho, L. M. 1979. Aspectos ecologicos do fogo no cerrado. III – A precipitação atmosférica de nutrientes minerais. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 2:97101.Google Scholar
Coutinho, L. M. 1980. As queimadas e seu papel ecológico. Brasil Florestal 44:723.Google Scholar
Coutinho, L. M. 1981. Aspectos ecológicos do fogo no cerrado. Nota sobre a ocorrência datação de carvões encontrados no interior de solo sob cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 4:115117.Google Scholar
Coutinho, L. M. 1982. Ecological effects of fire in Brazilian cerrado. Pp. 273291 in Huntley, J. B. & Walker, B. H. (eds). Ecology of tropical savannas. Springer-Verlag, New York. 669 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daubenmire, R. F. 1974. Plants and environment. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Pp. 320337.Google Scholar
DeBano, L. F. & Conrad, C. E. 1978. The effect of fire on nutrients in a chaparral ecosystem. Ecology 59:489497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiten, G. 1972. The cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Botanical Review 38:201341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiten, G. 1979. Formas fisionômicas do Cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 2:139148.Google Scholar
Evans, C. C. & Allen, S. E. 1971. Nutrient losses in smoke produced during heather burning. Oikos 22:149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, A. M., Groves, R. H. & Noble, I. R. (eds). 1981. Fire and the Australian biota. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra. 582 pp.Google Scholar
Goodland, R. 1971. A physiognomic analysis of the ‘cerrado’ vegetation of Central Brasil. Ecology 59:411419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, C. C. 1975. Wildlife effects on nutrients distribution and leaching in a coniferous ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 5:599607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koeppen, W. 1948. Las zonas de clima. Climatologia. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico. 478 pp.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. S. 1971. Effects of fire on the chemical status of herbaceous communities of the Derbyshire Dales. Journal of Ecology 59:261273.Google Scholar
Miranda, A. C., Dias, I. F. O. & Miranda, H. S. 1989. Temperatures durante queimadas de cerrado no Brasil Central. I Congresso Latino Americano de Ecologia (Abstracts). Universidad de la Republica Oriental del Uruguay. 65. pp.Google Scholar
Norman, M. J. T. & Wetselaar, R. 1960. Losses of nitrogen on burning native pasture in Katherine, N. T. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 26:272273.Google Scholar
Oliveira, J. B., Menk, J. R. F., Barbieri, J. L., Rotta, C. L. & Tremocoldi, W. 1982. Levantamento pedológico semi-detalhado do Estado de São Paulo – Quadricula de Araras. Boletin Técnico do Instituto Agronômico de Campinas 71:8894.Google Scholar
Pivello, V. R. 1985. Exportação de macronutrientes para a atmosfera durante queimadas realizadas no campo cerrado de Emas (Pirassununga, S.P.). Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 95 pp.Google Scholar
Raison, R. J., Khanna, P. K. & Woods, P. V. 1985. Mechanisms of element transfer to the atmosphere during vegetation fires. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 15:132140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, A. C. S. 1971. Climatologia dos Cerrados. Pp 1525 in Ferri, M. G. (ed.). III Simpósio sobre o Cerrado. Edgard Blucher/EDUSP, São Paulo. 238 pp.Google Scholar
Richter, D. D., Ralston, C. W. & Harms, W. R. 1982. Prescribed fire: Effects on water quality and forest nutrient cycling. Science 215:661663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarmiento, G. 1983. The savannas of tropical America. Pp. 245287 in Bourlière, F. (ed.). Tropical savannas. Elsevier, Oxford. 730 pp.Google Scholar
Schiavini, I. 1984. Ciclagem de nutrientes no cerrado. l-Agua de chuva. Ciência e Cultura (Suppl.) 36:634.Google Scholar
Seastedt, T. R. 1985. Canopy interception of nitrogen in bulk precipitation by annually burned and unburned tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 66:8892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stronach, N. R. H. & McNaughton, S. J. 1989. Grassland fire dynamics in the Serengeti ecosystem, and a potential method of retrospectively estimating fire energy. Journal of Applied Ecology 26:10251033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhet, A. L., Peres, J. R. R. & Vargas, M. A. T. 1987. Nitrogênio. Pp. 167202 in Goedert, W. J. (ed.). Solos dos Cerrados Nobel/EMBRAPA, Brasília. 422 pp.Google Scholar
Villecourt, P. & Roose, E. 1978. Charge en azote et en èlements minéraux majeurs des eaux de pluie, de pluviolessivage et de drainage dans la savane de Lamto (Cote d'Ivoire). Revue d'Ecologie et de Biologie du Sol 15:120.Google Scholar
Vlamis, J. & Gowans, K. D. 1961. Availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur after brush burning. Journal of Range Management 14:3840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, H., Harnickell, E. & Mueller-Dombois, D. 1975. Climate diagram maps. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 36pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. A. & Bailey, A. W. 1982. Fire Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 447 pp.Google Scholar
Zagatto, E. A. C., Jacintho, A. C., Reis, B. F., Krug, F. J., Bergamin, F. H., Pessenda, L. C. R., Mortatti, S. & Gine, M. F. 1981. Manual de Análises de Plantas e Aguas Empregando Sistemas de Injeção em Fluxo. Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura. Piracicaba, Brazil. 45 pp.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. (2nd edition). Prentice-Hall, London. 718 pp.Google Scholar