Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T10:13:26.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consensus between Ratings of Red Bordeaux Wines by Prominent Critics and Correlations with Prices 2004–2010 and 2011–2016: Ashton Revisited and Expanded

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2018

Marc F. Luxen
Marc F. Luxen*
Affiliation:
Satori Research, Pluutwerf 43, Gouda, The Netherlands; e-mail: marcluxen@yahoo.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wine consumers and producers make decisions partly on ratings of wine critics. Research into reliability (correspondence of repeated ratings of the same wines by one critic) and consensus (correspondence of ratings between critics or competitions) have yielded low estimates. However, Ashton (2013), looking at the consensus among only prominent critics of red Bordeaux, vintages 2004–2010, found a correlation of around 0.60. Here, I revisit these data, and extend the analyses to the years 2011–2016 for the same wines, but with additional new critics. Agreement among the critics (r = 0.57) of these new years is comparable to those found by Ashton (r = 0.60), with a slight upward trend. Overall, critics agree more about what they do not like. Regarding prices and ratings, wines score below-average ratings when they cost less than 35 euro, and higher ratings between 35 and 100 euro. In wines more than 100 euro there is no correlation between ratings and price. (JEL Classification: C99)

Keywords

Bordeaux quality ratingswine critic agreementwine critic consensuswine quality evaluationhedonic wine evaluationrating and costwine prices
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 83 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted to an anonymous reviewer for useful comments.

References

Ashton, R. H. (2012). Reliability and consensus of experienced wine judges: Expertise within and between? Journal of Wine Economics, 7(1), 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, R. H. (2013). Is there consensus among wine quality ratings of prominent critics? An empirical analysis of red Bordeaux, 2004–2010. Journal of Wine Economics, 8(2), 225–234.Google Scholar
Ashton, R. H. (2016). The value of expert opinion in the pricing of Bordeaux wine futures. Journal of Wine Economics, 11(2), 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolomey, D., and Van der Put, W. (2017). Bordoverview. http://bordoverview.com/ (accessed 10 August 2017).Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2016). Wine tasting, blind and otherwise: Blindness as a perceptual limitation? https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b678/d8b5316a2d43204eb19d7d95cce061700640.pdf (accessed 20 August 2017).Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. T. (2008). An examination of judge reliability at a major U.S. wine competition. Journal of Wine Economics, 3(2), 105–113.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. T. (2009a). An analysis of the concordance among 13 U.S. wine competitions. Journal of Wine Economics, 4(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. T. (2009b). How expert are “expert” wine judges? Journal of Wine Economics, 4(2), 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchmann, K. (2012). Wine economics. Journal of Wine Economics, 7(1), 1–33.Google Scholar