Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:50:21.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Blind Tasting Work? Investigating the Impact of Training on Blind Tasting Accuracy and Wine Preference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2018

Qian Janice Wang Open the ORCID record for Qian Janice Wang [Opens in a new window]  and
Domen Prešern
Qian Janice Wang
Affiliation:
Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Oxford, OX2 6BW, UK; e-mail: qian.wang@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Domen Prešern
Affiliation:
Physical & Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, UK; e-mail: domen.presern@chem.ox.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyzed data from Oxford University Blind Tasting Society's 2018 training season to assess whether blind tasting training improves accuracy. Over time, guesses for grape variety increased in terms of accuracy as well as within-group agreement. Moreover, for grape variety, location, and vintage, the chances of the most common within-group guess being correct were significantly higher than the underlying frequency distribution. Finally, we observed a shift in preference towards older wines, with those with little initial experience gaining a preference for greater acidity and alcohol, and decreasing their preference for oak. Our results have important implications for growing wine markets with an increasingly educated consumer population. (JEL Classifications: C91, C92, D83, L15, L66).

Keywords

blind wine tastingtrainingwine expertise
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 384 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank the American Association of Wine Economists (AAWE) for awarding our project with the AAWE Research Scholarship, AAWE Conference participants, and an anonymous reviewer for useful suggestions, and the members of the Oxford University Blind Tasting Society for their support.

References

Almenberg, J., and Dreber, A. (2011). When does the price affect the taste? Results from a wine experiment. Journal of Wine Economics, 6(1), 111–121.Google Scholar
Arvisenet, G., Guichard, E., and Ballester, J. (2016). Taste-aroma interaction in model wines: Effect of training and expertise. Food Quality and Preference, 52(September), 211–221.Google Scholar
Brochet, F., and Dubourdieu, D. (2001). Wine descriptive language supports cognitive specificity of chemical senses. Brain and Language, 77(2), 187–196.Google Scholar
Castriota-Scanderbeg, A., Hagberg, G. E., Cerasa, A., Committeri, G., Galati, G., Patria, F., et al. (2005). The appreciation of wine by sommeliers: A functional magnetic resonance study of sensory integration. NeuroImage, 25(2), 570–578.Google Scholar
D'Alessandro, S., and Pecotish, A. (2013). Evaluation of wine by expert and novice consumers in the presence of variations in quality, brand, and country of origin cues. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 287–303.Google Scholar
Gawel, R. (1997). The use of language by trained and untrained experienced wine tasters. Journal of Sensory Studies, 12(4), 267–284.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R., Almenberg, J., Dreber, A., Emerson, J. W., Herschkowitsch, A., and Katz, J. (2008). Do more expensive wines taste better? Evidence from a large sample of blind tastings. Journal of Wine Economics, 3(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Hughson, A. L., and Boakes, R. A. (2002). The knowing nose: The role of knowledge in wine expertise. Food Quality and Preference, 13(7–8), 463–472.Google Scholar
Ishii, R., and O'Mahony, M. (1991). Use of multiple standards to define sensory characteristics for descriptive analysis: Aspects of concept formation. Journal of Food Science, 56(3), 838–842.Google Scholar
Li, Y., and Bardaji, I. (2016). A new wine superpower? An analysis of the Chinese wine industry. American Association of Wine Economists, Working Paper No. 198, June 2016. Available from https://www.wine-economics.org/aawe-working-paper-no-198-business/.Google Scholar
Owen, D. H., and Machamer, P. K. (1979). Bias-free improvement in wine discrimination. Perception, 8(2), 199–209.Google Scholar
Parr, W. V., Heatherbell, D., and White, K. G. (2002). Demystifying wine expertise: Olfactory threshold, perceptual skill and semantic memory in expert and novice wine judges. Chemical Senses, 27(8), 747–755.Google Scholar
Rosenheck, D. (2017). Think wine connoisseurship is nonsense? Blind-tasting data suggest otherwise. The Economist, August 17th. Accessed from https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/05/daily-chart-11.Google Scholar
Royet, J.-P., Plailly, J., Saive, A.-L., Veyrac, A., and Delon-Martin, C. (2013). The impact of expertise in olfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 928. Available at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00928/full.Google Scholar
Segal, J., ed. (2013). Red, Whites and Varsity Blues: 60 Years of the Oxford & Cambridge Blind Wine-Tasting Competition. London, UK: Pavilion Books.Google Scholar
Weil, R. L. (2007). Debunking critics’ wine words: Can amateurs distinguish the smell of asphalt from the taste of cherries? Journal of Wine Economics, 2(2), 136–144.Google Scholar