Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:39:55.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mitigating Choice Overload: An Experiment in the U.S. Beer Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2018

Trey Malone  and
Jayson L. Lusk
Trey Malone
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, 446 W. Circle, Dr., Morrill Hall of Agriculture, East Lansing, MI 48824; e-mail: tmalone@msu.edu.
Jayson L. Lusk
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, 403 W. State St, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2056; e-mail: jlusk@purdue.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study tests the prevalence of choice overload (CO) in the U.S. beer market. We reveal that even if CO exists, sellers have mechanisms to reduce CO's negative consequences. The article describes the implementation of search cost-reducing private nudges (i.e., product quality scores and prominently listed specials) sellers commonly utilize to minimize CO's negative consequences. Our results suggest that, while CO exists for some buyers, it can be eliminated by market interactions on the part of the seller. (JEL Classifications: C93, D03, Q13)

Keywords

choice overloadcraft beersearch costs
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 48 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank an anonymous referee and the editor for their constructive comments. All remaining errors are the responsibility of the authors.

References

Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., and Lehmann, E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757–774.Google Scholar
Arentz, J., Sautet, F., and Storr, V. (2013). Prior-knowledge and opportunity identification. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 461–478.Google Scholar
Ariely, D., and Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Arunachalam, B., Henneberry, S., Lusk, J., and Norwood, B. (2009). An empirical investigation into the excessive-choice effect. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(3), 810–825.Google Scholar
Bylund, P., and McCaffrey, M. (2017). A theory of entrepreneurship and institutional uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 461–475.Google Scholar
Clark, R., Maki, J., and Morrill, M. (2014). Can simple informational nudges increase employee participation in a 401 (k) plan? Southern Economic Journal, 80(3), 677–701.Google Scholar
Chernev, A. (2003a). Product assortment and individual decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 859(1), 151–162.Google Scholar
Chernev, A. (2003b). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170–183.Google Scholar
Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., and Goodman, J. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333–358.Google Scholar
Consumer Reports. (2014). What to do when there are too many product choices on the store shelves? Consumer Reports, March 15.Google Scholar
Costanigro, M., McCluskey, J.J., and Mittelhammer, R.C. (2007). Segmenting the wine market based on price: Hedonic regression when different prices mean different products. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(3), 454–466.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. (1971). A model of price adjustment. Journal of Economic Theory, 3(2), 156–168.Google Scholar
Earl, P., Friesen, L., and Shadforth, C. (2017). The efficiency of market-assisted choice: An experimental analysis of mobile phone connection service recommendations. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(4): 849–873.Google Scholar
Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
Gourville, J., and Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395.Google Scholar
Greifeneder, R., Scheibehenne, B., and Kleber, N. (2010). Less may be more when choosing is difficult: Choice complexity and too much choice. Acta Psychologica, 133(1), 45–50.Google Scholar
Hadar, L., and Sood, S. (2014). When knowledge is demotivating: Subjective knowledge and choice overload. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1739–1747.Google Scholar
Haynes, G. (2009). Testing the boundaries of the choice overload phenomenon: The effect of number of options and time pressure on decision difficulty and satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 204–212.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Botti, S., and Hanko, K. (2011). Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 533–540.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., and Kamenica, E. (2010). Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation. Journal of Public Economics, 94(7), 530–539.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., and Lepper, M. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.Google Scholar
Jin, G., and Leslie, P. (2003). The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 409–451.Google Scholar
Kahn, B., and Wansink, B. (2004). The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 519–533.Google Scholar
Kamenica, E. (2008). Contextual inference in markets: On the informational content of product lines. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2127–2149.Google Scholar
List, J. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 41–71.Google Scholar
Malone, T., and Lusk, J. (2017). The excessive choice meets the market: A field experiment on craft beer choice. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 67(2), 8–13.Google Scholar
Malone, T., and Lusk, J. (2018). If you brew it, who will come? Market segments in the U.S. beer market. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 34(2), 204–221.Google Scholar
Manning, K., Bearden, W., and Madden, T. (1995). Consumer innovativeness and the adoption process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(4), 329–345.Google Scholar
McMullen, J., and Shepherd, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.Google Scholar
Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., and Iyengar, S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers' perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 202–215.Google Scholar
Norwood, F. (2006). Less choice is better, sometimes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 4(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Reutskaja, E., and Hogarth, R. (2009). Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When ‘goods satiate’. Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 197–203.Google Scholar
Shah, A., and Wolford, G. (2007). Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choices. Psychological Science, 18(5), 369–370.Google Scholar
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., and Todd, P. (2009). What moderates the too-much-choice effect? Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 229–253.Google Scholar
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., and Todd, P. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 409–425.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55(1), 79–88.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., and Lehman, D. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
Smith, A., and Zywicki, T. (2016). Nudging in an evolving marketplace: How markets improve their own choice architecture. In Abdukadirov, S. (ed.), Nudge Theory in Action, 225–250. Arlington, VA: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Szrek, H. (2017). How the number of options and perceived variety influence choice satisfaction: An experiment with prescription drug plans. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(1), 42–59.Google Scholar
Thaler, R., and Sunstein, C. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2), 175–179.Google Scholar